NCT02959671

Brief Summary

A cohort of 15 patients starting orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances will receive EXD-952 Ceramic Self-ligating brackets on all mandibular incisors and a different type of brackets on the remaining mandibular teeth. Tooth movement will be initiated using 0.014" or 0.016" Nickel-Titanium archwires. A second cohort of 15 patients will receive EXD-952 Ceramic Self-ligating bracket on all mandibular incisors in a later phase of their ongoing orthodontic treatment. The mandibular incisor brackets will be removed and EXD-952 Ceramic Self-ligating brackets placed instead. Other mandibular brackets will remain in place. Tooth movement will be performed using 0.019x0.025" Stainless Steel archwires. In both cohorts bracket door stability, the ability of the door to hold the archwire in the bracket slot, the bracket's ability to rotate teeth, clinicians' satisfaction with the bracket, and patient comfort in comparison with other brackets will be assessed. The evaluation for each patient will last for at least until one archwire change (cohort 1) or one appointment interval (6-8 weeks, cohort 2). After the evaluation period, EXD-952 Ceramic Self-ligating brackets will remain in place until the orthodontic treatment is completed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 2, 2016

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 9, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2017

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2020

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 14, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

January 14, 2021

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

November 2, 2016

Results QC Date

December 18, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Bracket Door Stability

    The stability of the bracket door is assessed at the time of bracket placement. Each bracket has 4 doors. Outcome is reported as the percent of bracket doors across all participants that break at bracket placement. Number of total broken bracket doors/number of total bracket doors across all participants \* 100. Unit of measure is "percentage of bracket doors."

    baseline

  • Ability of Door to Successfully Hold the Archwire in the Bracket Slot

    The ability of door to hold the archwire in the bracket slot is assessed at the time of bracket placement. If the door is unable to hold the archwire, then spontaneous door opening occurs. Each bracket has 4 doors. Outcome is reported as the percent of bracket doors that successfully held the archwire within the bracket slot at bracket placement. Number of successful bracket doors/number of total bracket doors across all participants \* 100. Unit of measure is "percentage of bracket doors."

    baseline

  • Bracket's Ability to Rotate Teeth

    The bracket's ability to rotate teeth will be assessed after the first archwire change (expected 6-8 weeks after initial bonding). Clinician will rate rotational correction as adequate or not adequate. Outcome is reported as the percent of participants for whom the clinician rated rotational correction as adequate.

    6-8 weeks

  • Clinicians' Satisfaction With the Bracket

    The clinician's satisfaction with the bracket will be assessed after the first archwire change (expected 6-8 weeks after initial bonding). Clinician will rate their satisfaction on a 5-point Likert scale (Very unsatisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, neutral, somewhat satisfied, very satisfied). A rating of 4 (somewhat satisfied) or 5 (very satisfied) is considered successful. Outcome is reported as the percent of participants for whom the clinician rated bracket satisfaction as somewhat satisfied or very satisfied.

    6-8 weeks

  • Patient Comfort in Comparison With Other Brackets (Questionnaire)

    The patient's comfort in comparison with other brackets will be assessed after the first archwire change (expected 6-8 weeks after initial bonding). Patients will rate their satisfaction on a 5-point Likert scale (Very unsatisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, neutral, somewhat satisfied, very satisfied). A rating of 4 (somewhat satisfied) or 5 (very satisfied) is considered successful. Outcome is reported as the percent of participants who rated their comfort in comparison with other brackets as somewhat satisfied or very satisfied.

    6-8 weeks

Study Arms (1)

Lower Anterior EXD-952 Self-ligating Brackets

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Lower Anterior EXD-952 Self-ligating Brackets

Interventions

Placement of EXD-952 Self-ligating Brackets on mandibular incisors

Lower Anterior EXD-952 Self-ligating Brackets

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Permanent mandibular dentition including incisors, canines, premolars, and first molars (includes subjects treated with the extraction of premolars)
  • Mandibular incisors with sound, non-carious buccal enamel and no pretreatment with chemical agents such as hydrogen peroxide

You may not qualify if:

  • Mental/emotional/developmental disability
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Cleft lip and/or palate, craniofacial anomaly, or syndrome
  • Obvious oral hygiene issues such as excessive plaque accumulation, gingivitis, and/or pre-existing white spot lesions
  • Prosthodontic or restored substrate extending on the labial surface of mandibular incisors
  • Deep bite
  • Known allergies to any study materials

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Thorsten Gruenheid, DDS, PhD
Organization
University of Minnesota

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2016

First Posted

November 9, 2016

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion

January 1, 2020

Study Completion

January 1, 2020

Last Updated

January 14, 2021

Results First Posted

January 14, 2021

Record last verified: 2020-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations