NCT02030002

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare bonding time, bond survival, amount of adhesive remaining on the tooth surface after bracket debonding, and time required for adhesive remnant cleanup between a new "flash-free" and a conventional adhesive resin for orthodontic bracket bonding.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 8, 2014

Completed
5.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2019

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 12, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

January 12, 2021

Status Verified

December 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6.2 years

First QC Date

December 3, 2013

Results QC Date

November 19, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Bonding Time

    The time taken to bond each tooth was timed to the nearest second using a digital stopwatch. Timing was started after enamel surface preparation and stopped before light curing. Outcome reported in seconds.

    At appliance placement, 30 minutes

  • Bond Survival

    Bond failure (yes or no) was recorded at standardized appointments at intervals of 4 weeks. Outcome is reported as the cumulative number of failed bracket bonds across all participants at 1 year post-treatment.

    1 year post treatment

  • Amount of Adhesive Remaining on the Tooth Surface After Bracket Debonding

    In case of a bond failure, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was scored. The ARI is a point-based system ranking: 0, no adhesive left on the tooth; 1, less than half of the adhesive left on the tooth; 2, more than half of the adhesive left on the tooth; and 3, all adhesive left on the tooth.

    At completion of treatment, 10 minutes.

  • Time Required for Adhesive Remnant Cleanup

    If adhesive remained after bracket de-bonding, then the time required to remove the remnant adhesive was measured using a digital stop-watch. Outcome is reported in seconds.

    At completion of treatment, 30 minutes.

Study Arms (2)

APC Flash-Free Adhesive Coated Appliance System

EXPERIMENTAL

APC Flash-Free Adhesive Coated Appliance System

Device: APC Flash-Free Adhesive Coated Appliance System

APC II Adhesive Coated Appliance System

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

APC II Adhesive Coated Appliance System

Device: APC II Adhesive Coated Appliance System

Interventions

APC Flash-Free Adhesive Coated Appliance System

APC Flash-Free Adhesive Coated Appliance System

APC II Adhesive Coated Appliance System

APC II Adhesive Coated Appliance System

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Full permanent dentition including incisors, canines, premolars, and first molars
  • Teeth with sound, non-carious buccal enamel and no pretreatment with chemical agents such as hydrogen peroxide
  • No previous orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances

You may not qualify if:

  • Mental/emotional/developmental disability
  • Cleft lip and/or palate, craniofacial anomaly, or syndrome
  • Obvious oral hygiene issues such as excessive plaque accumulation, gingivitis, and/or pre-existing white spot lesions
  • Prosthodontic or restored substrate extending on the labial surface of maxillary teeth
  • Known allergies to any acrylates contained in the study materials

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Grunheid T, Larson BE. Comparative assessment of bonding time and 1-year bracket survival using flash-free and conventional adhesives for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Nov;154(5):621-628. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.05.012.

  • Grunheid T, Larson BE. A comparative assessment of bracket survival and adhesive removal time using flash-free or conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):299-305. doi: 10.2319/030918-195.1. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Thorsten Gruenheid
Organization
University of Minnesota

Study Officials

  • Thorsten Gruenheid, DDS, PhD

    University of Minnesota

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Split-mouth
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2013

First Posted

January 8, 2014

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2019

Study Completion

December 31, 2019

Last Updated

January 12, 2021

Results First Posted

January 12, 2021

Record last verified: 2020-12

Locations