Effects of Caffeine on EEG Theta/Beta Ratio and Cognitive Control
The Effects of a Single Administration of a Moderate Dose of Caffeine on Cognitive Control and Spontaneous EEG Theta/Beta Ratio
2 other identifiers
interventional
41
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cognitive control driven by the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of the brain is thought to be important for goal-directed control over stimulus-driven processes. EEG-measured spontaneous theta/beta ratio (TBR) may potentially be used as an electrophysiological marker for this PFC-mediated cognitive control. In the present study the investigators further examine TBR as an electrophysiological marker for cognitive control, by administering caffeine to forty healthy female participants. After a first training session, participants will visit the lab twice in separate weeks, during which they will orally consume one capsule containing 200mg of caffeine, and one capsule containing a placebo substance (double-blind and random order of administration). EEG will be measured before and after capsule consumption, and cognitive control tasks will be administered after capsule consumption. Generally, the investigators expect that caffeine will decrease TBR and thereby increase cognitive control. Additionally, the investigators expect that individual differences in baseline frontal (reflected by TBR) and central dopaminergic (reflected by spontaneously-measured eye-blink rates; EBR) activity will moderate the relationship between caffeine and cognitive control. Furthermore, the effects of caffeine on specifically hypervigilance for threatening distractors (taking into account a possible moderating role of trait anxiety) were examined as a separate research question.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 21, 2016
CompletedMarch 8, 2017
March 1, 2017
5 months
October 17, 2016
March 7, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Attentional focus (RT)
TACT focus RTs on incongruent v congruent (correct) trials.
Approx. 45 min after capsule consumption
Attentional shift (RT)
TACT shift RTs on post-shift trials compared to pre-shift (correct) trials.
Approx. 45 min after capsule consumption
Emotional interference (RT)
Emotional Stroop Task RTs for neutral, positive, and negative (correct) trials.
Approx. 70 min after capsule consumption
EEG theta/beta ratio
For mediation analyses, change in EEG theta/beta ratio after caffeine consumption relative to placebo consumption.
Approx. 30 min after capsule consumption
EEG theta/beta ratio
For moderation analyses, baseline-measured spontaneous EEG theta/beta ratio.
Baseline
Spontaneous eye-blink rates
For moderation analyses, baseline-measured spontaneous eye-blink rates.
Baseline
Trait anxiety
Self-reported trait anxiety (STAI-t)
Baseline
Working memory (ACC)
N-Back accuracy (% correct) in the 1-back and 3-back conditions.
Approx. 60 min after capsule consumption
Working memory (RT)
N-Back RTs on correct trials in the 1-back and 3-back conditions.
Approx. 60 min after capsule consumption
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Attentional focus (ACC)
Approx. 45 min after capsule consumption
Attentional shift (ACC)
Approx. 45 min after capsule consumption
Other Outcomes (2)
TBR and ACS
Baseline
TBR and STAI-t
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Caffeine first, placebo second
OTHERCaffeine consumption during session 1, placebo consumption during session 2 (after baseline session "0").
Placebo first, caffeine second
OTHERPlacebo consumption during session 1, caffeine consumption during session 2 (after baseline session "0").
Interventions
Oral consumption of capsule containing 200mg caffeine.
Oral consumption of capsule containing a placebo substance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Female
- Age 18-26 years
- Consuming less than 100mg of caffeine (about one cup of coffee) per day on average (evaluated using pre-defined caffeine contents, e.g.: coffee: 85mg/cup; cappuccino: 100mg/cup; tea: 40mg/cup; cola: 18mg/cup; energy drink: 80mg/can)
- Fluent in Dutch language
- Severe physical or psychological morbidity that would adversely affect participation
- Habitual smoking
- Use of psychopharmaceuticals
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Leiden University
Leiden, South Holland, 2333AK, Netherlands
Related Publications (14)
Putman P, van Peer J, Maimari I, van der Werff S. EEG theta/beta ratio in relation to fear-modulated response-inhibition, attentional control, and affective traits. Biol Psychol. 2010 Feb;83(2):73-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.008. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
PMID: 19897008BACKGROUNDPutman P, Verkuil B, Arias-Garcia E, Pantazi I, van Schie C. EEG theta/beta ratio as a potential biomarker for attentional control and resilience against deleterious effects of stress on attention. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jun;14(2):782-91. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0238-7.
PMID: 24379166BACKGROUNDJongkees BJ, Colzato LS. Spontaneous eye blink rate as predictor of dopamine-related cognitive function-A review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:58-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.020. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
PMID: 27555290BACKGROUNDCools R, D'Esposito M. Inverted-U-shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control. Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Jun 15;69(12):e113-25. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.03.028. Epub 2011 May 4.
PMID: 21531388BACKGROUNDEysenck MW, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo MG. Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion. 2007 May;7(2):336-53. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336.
PMID: 17516812BACKGROUNDMiyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol. 2000 Aug;41(1):49-100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734.
PMID: 10945922BACKGROUNDKarson CN. Spontaneous eye-blink rates and dopaminergic systems. Brain. 1983 Sep;106 (Pt 3):643-53. doi: 10.1093/brain/106.3.643.
PMID: 6640274BACKGROUNDBarry RJ, Clarke AR, Johnstone SJ. A review of electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: I. Qualitative and quantitative electroencephalography. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Feb;114(2):171-83. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00362-0.
PMID: 12559224BACKGROUNDEinother SJ, Giesbrecht T. Caffeine as an attention enhancer: reviewing existing assumptions. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Jan;225(2):251-74. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2917-4. Epub 2012 Dec 16.
PMID: 23241646BACKGROUNDDerryberry D, Reed MA. Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 May;111(2):225-36. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.111.2.225.
PMID: 12003445BACKGROUNDSmillie LD, Gokcen E. Caffeine enhances working memory for extraverts. Biol Psychol. 2010 Dec;85(3):496-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.08.012. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
PMID: 20816912BACKGROUNDArnsten AF. Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Jun;10(6):410-22. doi: 10.1038/nrn2648.
PMID: 19455173BACKGROUNDGratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E. A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 Apr;55(4):468-84. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9.
PMID: 6187540BACKGROUNDKooij JJ, Buitelaar JK, van den Oord EJ, Furer JW, Rijnders CA, Hodiamont PP. Internal and external validity of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in a population-based sample of adults. Psychol Med. 2005 Jun;35(6):817-27. doi: 10.1017/s003329170400337x.
PMID: 15997602BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Putman, PhD
Leiden University, Clinical Psychology Unit
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2016
First Posted
October 21, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 8, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03