Study Stopped
The sponsor failed to provide financial support as promised.
Effects of Gunnar Computer Glasses on Viewing Comfort and Performance
The Effect of Computer Eyewear on Viewing Comfort and Performance in Office Work
2 other identifiers
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed study aims to test if Gunnar computer glasses provide any advantages, in comparison to no glasses, on the following aspects in computer-related office work:
- Any enhancement on the visual performance of the basic visual function, including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color discrimination, etc.
- Any enhancement on the visual performance of typical office work, including reading, word-spelling check, number searching, or target identification.
- Any benefit in objective viewing comfort measured with viewing distance, blink frequency, post-viewing pupil size.
- Any benefit in subjective viewing comfort reflected on the questionnaire of viewing symptom survey.
- Any benefit in viewing comfort and visual performance with increased environmental ventilation or under the strong glare.
- Any benefit in life quality from daily wearing (e.g., better comfort or sleep quality).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 6, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 16, 2025
CompletedJuly 16, 2025
June 1, 2025
3 months
June 17, 2013
March 18, 2019
June 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Subjective Rating of Gunnar Computer Glasses Preference
At the end of the study in Visit 3, subjects were asked to respond if they felt the Gunnar TC Glasses improved their computer viewing comfort and visual performance (choose between "Yes" and "No").
at the end of the study in Visit 3, up to day 16
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Subjective Viewing Discomfort Rating
Data were collected at the end of Visit 2 (at least 3 days after Visit 1, between Day 4 and Day 8) and Visit 3 (at least 3 days after Visit 2, up to Day 16).
Visual Acuity
during Visit 2 (at least 3 days after Visit 1, between Day 4 and Day 8) and Visit 3 (at least 3 days after Visit 2, up to Day 16)
Color Perception
during Visit 2 (at leadays after Visit 1, between Day 4 and Day 8) and Visit 3 (at least 3 days after Visit 2, up to Day 16)
Spelling Check Accuracy
Performance was measured during visit 2 (at least 3 days after Visit 1, between Day 4 and Day 8) and visit 3 (at least 3 days after Visit 2, up to Day 16).
Dry Eye Measurements (1): Tear Film Break-up Time (Seconds)
during Visit 2 (at least 3 days after Visit 1, between Day 4 and Day 8) and Visit 3 (at least 3 days after Visit 2, upto Day 16)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Experimenter: Gunnar OTC Glasses, Then Control
EXPERIMENTALOn Visit 1, after the screening and baseline measurements, participants were given a pair of Gunnar OTC glasses (Intervention 1) and asked to work on the computer with the glasses for at least 4 hours for 5+/-2 days of adaptation (Habituation 1). On Visit 2, they performed the designated computer tasks with the glasses to complete the Gunnar condition. Then they were asked to work on the computers for at least 4 hours without any glasses (Intervention 2) for another 5+/-2 days (Habituation 2). On Visit 3, they performed the same tasks without any glasses to complete the Control condition. Then Participants responded if they prefer wearing the Gunnar OTC Glasses when working on a computer.
Experimenter: Control, Then Gunnar OTC Glasses
EXPERIMENTALOn Visit 1, after the screening and baseline measurements, participants were told to work on the computer for at least 4 hours without glasses (Intervention 1) for 5+/-2 days of adaptation (Habituation 1). On Visit 2, they performed the designated computer tasks without glasses to complete the Control condition. Then they were given a pair of Gunnar OTC Glasses to wear (Intervention 2) while working on the computers for 4+ hours daily for another 5+/-2 days (Habituation 2). On Visit 3, they performed the same tasks with the Gunnar glasses to complete the Gunnar condition. Then Participants responded if they prefer wearing the Gunnar OTC Glasses when working on a computer.
Interventions
Gunnar Over-the-Counter Computer Glasses have optical power of 0.5 diopters for reducing accommodation demands at a typical computer-viewing distance. The lens also have a partially transmissive yellow tinting and anti-reflective coating for filtering part of the spectral peaks in typical fluorescent or incandescent light. The frame has a wrape-around design meant to reduce air flow in the vicinity of the eyes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must be between 18 to 42 years old.
- Subjects must have a normal color vision (be able to identify the numbers in the color blind test.
- Subjects' near and far visual acuity with the better eye needs to be 20/25 or better (measured with a vision chart). Subjects can wear contact lenses (but not glasses) if usually wear them while working on computers.
- Subjects must routinely work on a computer or digital display for an average of 4 hours or more each day.
- Subjects can communicate in English fluently and are used to read English documents on a computer.
- Subjects must have a valid tax number or social security number to receive monetary compensation.
You may not qualify if:
- The difference in the prescription for both eyes is equal to or larger than 2 Diopters.
- Subjects have a cataract or have had cataract surgery.
- Subjects are sensitive to lights (photosensitivity).
- Subjects have prior incidents or are known to have claustrophobia.
- Subjects have been diagnosed with oculomotor diseases or central nervous system diseases, or with developmental, neurological, or psychiatric disorders (e.g., attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, mental retardation).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pacific Universitylead
- Gunnar Optikscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vision Performance Institute, 129 Scott Hall, Pacific University
Forest Grove, Oregon, 97116, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Yu-Chi Tai
- Organization
- Pacific University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yu-Chi Tai, PhD
Pacific University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2013
First Posted
October 6, 2016
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 1, 2013
Study Completion
September 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 16, 2025
Results First Posted
July 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is not a plan to make IPD available.