Randomized Controlled Trial of Long-term Treatment Effectiveness for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) and Dry Eye
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
9
Brief Summary
The study objective is to evaluate the long-term treatment effectiveness for adult patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and evaporative dry eye by: 1) comparing the LipiFlow® System to a standardized daily warm compress and eyelid hygiene control therapy over a duration of 3 Months; and 2) evaluating the LipiFlow® alone and in combination with other MGD and dry eye treatments over a duration of up to 12 Months. This is a post-market, non-significant risk, prospective and multi-center clinical trial divided into two stages. The first stage from enrollment to 3 Months is an open-label, randomized controlled design to compare the effectiveness of a single LipiFlow® System treatment to a standardized daily warm compress and eyelid hygiene Control therapy with Crossover LipiFlow® treatment of the Control subjects at 3 Months. The second stage, occurring between 3 and 12 Months, is an observational design to evaluate the effectiveness of LipiFlow® alone and in combination with other MGD and dry eye treatments over a duration of up to 12 Months. Subjects are entered into the following subgroups based on the subject's self-assessment of the adequacy of symptom relief and protocol-defined criteria for additional treatment.
- 1.One LipiFlow® Treatment: Subjects who receive only one LipiFlow® treatment.
- 2.Two LipiFlow® Treatments: Subjects who receive a second LipiFlow® treatment.
- 3.Combination Treatment: Subjects who receive one or two LipiFlow® treatments followed by other MGD or dry eye treatment, as prescribed by the physician.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 26, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 30, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 23, 2015
CompletedFebruary 23, 2015
February 1, 2015
1.8 years
January 26, 2012
February 4, 2015
February 4, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Stage 1 Mean Change in Total Meibomian Gland Score From Baseline to 3 Months
To assess the meibomian glands, the secretion characteristics from 15 gland orifices along the lower eyelid were evaluated under a slit lamp biomicrosope using a handheld instrument, Meibomian Gland Evaluator, to apply gentle standardized pressure to the eyelid margin. Expressed secretion characteristics were graded on a scale of 3 (clear liquid secretion), 2 (cloudy liquid secretion), 1 (inspissated/toothpaste consistency), and 0 (no secretion). Total meibomian gland score was calculated based on the sum of the secretion grades for all 15 glands over a range from 0 to 45 with a higher score reflecting less meibomian gland dysfunction. To be eligible for the study, the Baseline total meibomian gland score must have been 12 or less in each eye. Change = 3 Month score - Baseline Score.
Baseline and 3 Months
Stage 2 Mean Total Meibomian Gland Score at 12 Months
To assess the meibomian glands, the secretion characteristics from 15 gland orifices along the lower eyelid were evaluated under a slit lamp biomicrosope using a handheld instrument, Meibomian Gland Evaluator, to apply gentle standardized pressure to the eyelid margin. Expressed secretion characteristics were graded on a scale of 3 (clear liquid secretion), 2 (cloudy liquid secretion), 1 (inspissated/toothpaste consistency), and 0 (no secretion). Total meibomian gland score was calculated based on the sum of the secretion grades for all 15 glands over a range from 0 to 45 with a higher score reflecting less meibomian gland dysfunction. The total meibomian gland score at 12 Months was compared across subgroups, as defined below.
12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Stage 1 Mean Change in Total OSDI Score From Baseline to 3 Months
Baseline, 3 Months
Stage 2 Mean Total OSDI Score at 12 Months
12 Months
Study Arms (2)
LipiFlow System
EXPERIMENTALTreatment with LipiFlow System at randomization in Stage 1 of study
Warm Compress and Lid Hygiene
ACTIVE COMPARATORControl group receiving warm compress therapy and lid hygiene at randomization in Stage 1 of study and crossover LipiFlow System treatment in Stage 2 of study
Interventions
In-office device treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction by a physician
At-home daily warm compress therapy and lid hygiene
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years old
- Tear film assessment that qualifies in both eyes
- Evidence of meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye in both eyes
- Willingness to comply with study protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Systemic disease condition or medication that causes dry eye
- Use of other treatments for MGD or dry eye
- Ocular surgery, trauma, herpes infection, punctal plug insertion or punctal occlusion within past 3 months
- Active eye infection
- Active eye inflammation or recurrent inflammation within past 3 months
- Moderate to severe allergic conjunctivitis
- Severe eyelid inflammation
- Eyelid abnormality that affects lid function
- Ocular surface abnormality that may compromise corneal integrity
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Participation in another ophthalmic clinical trial within past 30 days
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
McDonald Eye Associates
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703, United States
Harvard Eye Associates
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
Center for Excellence in Eye Care
Miami, Florida, 33176, United States
Chicago Cornea Consultants, Ltd.
Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 60169, United States
Jackson Eye
Lake Villa, Illinois, 50046, United States
Cincinnati Eye Institute - Northern Kentucky
Edgewood, Kentucky, 41017, United States
Charles River Eye Associates
Winchester, Massachusetts, 01890, United States
Associated Eye Care
Stillwater, Minnesota, 55082, United States
Ophthalmology Consultants, Ltd.
St Louis, Missouri, 63131, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- TearScience, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Christy Stevens, O.D.
TearScience, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 26, 2012
First Posted
January 30, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 23, 2015
Results First Posted
February 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-02