A Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
6
Brief Summary
Approximately 120 subjects will be comparing two soft contact lenses for one week each.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 13, 2016
CompletedJune 19, 2018
July 1, 2016
1 month
April 22, 2015
May 5, 2016
June 18, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Subjective Overall Comfort
Subjective Overall Comfort was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Comfort scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response.
1-week Follow-up
Subjective Overall Vision
Subjective Overall Vision was evaluated using the Contact Lens User Experience Vison scores (CLUE). CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response.
1-week Follow-up
Study Arms (2)
senofilcon A/ delefilcon A/ senofilcon A
EXPERIMENTALSubjects were randomized to one two lens wear sequences. Subjects randomized to this sequence first wore the senofilcon A contact lens, then wore the delefilcon A contact lens second and then wore the senofilcon A contact lens third.
delefilcon A/senofilcon A/ delfilcon A
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects were randomized to one two lens wear sequences. Subjects randomized to this sequence first wore the delefilcon A contact lens then wore the senofilcon A contact lens second and then wore the Control lens delefilcon A contact lens third.
Interventions
Subjects will wear the contact lenses in both eyes for seven days
Subjects will wear the contact lenses in both eyes for seven days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject must read, understand, and sign the Statement of Informed Consent, and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
- The subject must be appear able and willing to adhere to instruction set forth in this clinical protocol.
- The subject be between (and including) 18 and 39 years of age.
- The subject must be an adapted wearer of spherical soft contact lenses in both eyes. That is, the subject must wear their habitual lenses at least five (5) days per week and eight (8) hours per day worn for at least 30 days immediately preceding the study.
- The subject's vertex corrected spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -0.50 to -6.00 D in each eye.
- The subject must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently pregnant or breastfeeding (subjects who become pregnant during the study will be discontinued).
- Any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear.
- Any autoimmune disease or use of any medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear.
- Entropoin, Ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, or aphakia.
- Any previous, or planned ocular or intraocular surgery (e.g. radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.)
- Any grade 3 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g. edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) on the FDA classification scale, any previous history or signs of a contact lens-related inflammatory event (e.g. past peripheral ulcer or round scar), or any other ocular abnormality that may contraindicate contact lens wear.
- Any ocular infection.
- Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.
- Monovision, multifocal, toric, or extended wear contact lens correction.
- Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 14 days prior to study enrollment.
- History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus.
- Any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV) by self-report.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Unknown Facility
Montgomery, Alabama, 36109, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville Beach, Florida, 32250, United States
Unknown Facility
Longwood, Florida, 32779, United States
Unknown Facility
Winter Park, Florida, 32792, United States
Unknown Facility
Westerville, Ohio, 43081, United States
Unknown Facility
Salem, Virginia, 24153, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- John R. Buch, O.D., M.S., F.A.A.O.
- Organization
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2015
First Posted
April 28, 2015
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 19, 2018
Results First Posted
June 13, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07