Feasibility and Yield of a New 20 G ProCore Needle With Coiled Sheath in the Gastrointestinal Subepithelial Tumors
1 other identifier
interventional
39
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The exact incidence of subepithelial tumors (SETs) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is unknown, but the prevalence of gastric SETs detected during routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy is 0.36%. GI SETs may include leiomyoma, GI stromal tumor (GIST), schwannoma, lipoma, cyst, or ectopic pancreas. Surgical resection is the principal diagnostic and therapeutic method for SETs, especially for large and symptomatic ones. Preoperative pathological diagnosis of SETs may facilitate clinical decision making, but conventional endoscopic forceps biopsy does not yield adequate amounts of subepithelial tissue for definitive diagnosis. Although endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the best imaging modality for the evaluation of SETs, it cannot substitute histopathological diagnosis. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) may provide adequate amounts of tissue for the diagnosis of SETs, but it does not always afford adequate samples for immunohistochemical analysis because of the often small number of cells obtained by aspiration. Since some SETs, especially GI mesenchymal tumors such as GIST or schwannoma, have varied morphologic appearances, and diagnosis using a small biopsy is not straightforward, immunohistochemical analysis is strongly advisable, if not essential. EUS-guided Trucut biopsy (EUS-TNB) may overcome the limitations of EUS-FNA in procuring sufficient core tissue specimens. Although EUS-TNB is more accurate than EUS-FNA for diagnosing GI mesenchymal tumors, the rigidity of its 19-gauge (G) caliber and the mechanical friction of the firing mechanism produced by the torqued echoendoscope limit its use for SETs located in the gastric antrum and duodenum. Therefore, a needle facilitating adequate histological core sampling with easy maneuverability needs to be established. A 19G EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) device with ProCore reverse-bevel technology was recently introduced. A multicenter study revealed that histological samples could be successfully obtained using this needle in most patients having GI SETs, with a diagnostic accuracy of \>80%.10 However, because of technical difficulties with this needle in the gastric antrum and duodenum, the same FNB device was recently developed in a 20 G platform with coiled sheath. This prospective, multicenter study aimed to evaluate feasibility, yield, and diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed 20 G ProCore needle with coiled sheath in patients with GI SETs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 23, 2018
January 1, 2018
6 months
August 21, 2016
January 21, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
diagnostic sufficiency
Diagnostic sufficiency is defined as the proportion of patients in whom the histopathological diagnosis could be established within three needle passes.
up to 2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
diagnostic failure rate
up to 2 weeks
technical failure rate
up to 1 day
complications
up to 4 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Arm who will undergo EUS-FNB
OTHERInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having a hypoechoic mass in the submucosal and/or proper muscle layers on the basis of EUS and tumor \>2 cm in size
You may not qualify if:
- SETs were not located in the submucosal and/or proper muscle layers on EUS
- EUS revealed the characteristic findings of lipoma, cyst, vessel or extraluminal lesions; the platelet count was \<50,000/mm3 and prothrombin time was \<50%
- The patient did not provide consent to undergo the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Kim DH, Kim GH, Cho CM, Park CH, Na SY, Kim TH, Cho YK, Kim JH, Seo DW; Korean EUS Study Group. Feasibility of a 20-gauge ProCore needle in EUS-guided subepithelial tumor sampling: a prospective multicenter study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0880-1.
PMID: 30340469DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2016
First Posted
August 30, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01