NCT02870686

Brief Summary

For endoscopist, ERCP for bile duct stone removal is the most widely performed procedure. However, the risk associated radiation exposure to patients and staff are not neglible. Earlier studies, ERCP without the use of fluoroscopy has been reported high success for bile duct stone removal in pregnant patients to prevent radiation exposure to the fetus. EUS is highy accurate technique in detecting common bile duct stone and guiding for therapeutic intervention. There has been a few data from literature showed that EUS guided CBD stone ( CBDS ) removal are equivalent to those following ERCP in term of successful CBDS removal and complications. This randomized trial is designed to address the question that EUS guided CBDS removal is equivalent to ERCP in term of efficacy and safety.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
114

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2013

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 13, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 17, 2016

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

December 14, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

August 13, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 13, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

ERCPEUS guided ERCP without fluoroscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Treatment success

    The number of patients who achieved complete stone clearance in either EGWF or ERCP techniques.

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Technical success

    24 hours

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Compare procedure time

    24 hours

  • Compare fluoroscopy time

    24 hours

  • Complication rate

    30 days

Study Arms (2)

ERCP without the use of fluoroscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients with uncomplicated bile duct stones detected by EUS was assigned to the EUS guided ERCP without fluoroscopy clear all of the bile duct stones.

Procedure: ERCP without the use of fluoroscopy

ERCP with the use of fluoroscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients with uncomplicated bile duct stones detected by EUS was assigned to underwent ERCP with the use of fluoroscopy to clear all of the bile duct stones.

Procedure: ERCP with the use of fluoroscopy

Interventions

ERCP removal of stone technique without the use of fluoroscopy involves: (1) catheter with wire achieve bile duct, (2) confirmation of bile duct achievement with catheter aspiration of bile, (3) performance of endoscopic biliary sphinctertome, (4) stone removal with balloon or basket- number of stones removed should compare number detected on EUS, (5) confirmation of complete stone clearance with radiocontrast.

ERCP without the use of fluoroscopy

ERCP removal of stone technique with the use of fluoroscopy involves: (1) catheter with wire achieve bile duct, (2) confirmation of bile duct achievement with fluoroscopy images, (3) performance of endoscopic biliary sphinctertome, (4) stone removal with balloon or basket, (5) confirmation of complete stone clearance with radiocontrast.

ERCP with the use of fluoroscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who had EUS presence of CBDS ≤ 10 mm, and EUS images absence of CBD stricture and CBD narrowing below the stones

You may not qualify if:

  • pregnancy
  • concomitant intrahepatic bile duct stones
  • malignant bile duct stricture
  • altered gastrointestinal anatomy
  • instability hemodynamics
  • concomitant emergency situation
  • unwilling to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

NKC Institues of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Prince of Songkla University

Hat Yai, Changwat Songkhla, 90110, Thailand

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Netinatsunton N, Sottisuporn J, Attasaranya S, Witeerungrot T, Siripun A, Pattarapuntakul T, Ovartlarnporn B. Prospective randomized trial of EUS-assisted ERCP without fluoroscopy versus ERCP in common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Dec;86(6):1059-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1539. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Choledocholithiasis

Interventions

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Common Bile Duct DiseasesBile Duct DiseasesBiliary Tract DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesCholelithiasis

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CholangiographyRadiography, AbdominalRadiographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisDiagnostic Techniques, Digestive SystemEndoscopy, Digestive SystemEndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDigestive System Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeMinimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Study Officials

  • Nisa Netinatsunton, MD.

    NKC Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2016

First Posted

August 17, 2016

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion

September 1, 2016

Study Completion

October 1, 2016

Last Updated

December 14, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The individual data of patients participating in the study are not available for public sharing since we did not obtain the consent to share the data of patient

Locations