Role of EUS in High Risk of Choledocholithiasis
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to demonstrate that patients with high risk of choledocholithiasis who undergo ERCP only for patients with choledocholith in the EUS examination\[EUS-ERCP group\] have less negative outcomes (including false-negative results and procedure-related complications) than patients who undergo ERCP in all patients with high risk of choledocholithiasis\[ERCP group\]. The primary outcome is the incidence of negative outcomes (including false-negative results and procedure-related complications) in both groups. The secondary outcomes included days of hospitalization and the rate of diagnostic ERC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 25, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 5, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 5, 2020
CompletedMarch 18, 2021
March 1, 2021
2.9 years
July 18, 2017
March 15, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Any negative outcomes related to either a false-negative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis or the endoscopic procedure
Negative outcomes associated with a false-negative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis were defined as follows: 1) diagnosis of choledocholithiasis during follow-up or 2) hospitalization for a condition likely associated with choledocholithiasis, such as biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis, or obstructive jaundice. Negative outcomes of endoscopic procedures were assessed according to the ASGE lexicon
6 months after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Length of hospital stay
6 months after randomization
Other Outcomes (1)
The rate of diagnostic ERC (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography)
6 months after randomization
Study Arms (2)
EUS-ERCP group
EXPERIMENTALEUS is performed first, and when the examiner finds bile duct stone in the EUS examination, ERCP is performed to remove the stone.
ERCP group
ACTIVE COMPARATORERCP without EUS is performed in all patients.
Interventions
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is performed with radial scanning echo endoscope (Olympus GF UE260) by four endosonographers. EUS examination is performed first, and if there is choledocholith, ERCP is performed.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is performed with duodenoscope (Olympus JF-260V or TJF-260V) by four endoscopists. * In the EUS-ERCP group, ERCP is used to remove bile duct stones diagnosed via EUS. Therefore, only ERCP is performed in patients with choledocholithiasis in EUS. * In the ERCP group, diagnosis and treatment of bile duct stones are performed with ERCP.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Abdominal CT or US showed a common bile duct diameter \> 6mm (\>8mm in patients with previous cholecystectomy) and elevated total bilirubin from 1.8mg/dL to less than 4.0mg/dL
You may not qualify if:
- Severe mental illness
- Severe co-morbidity (ESRD, Advanced COPD, severe Heart failure, poorly controlled blood sugar)
- Pregnancy
- Pancreatic cancer or suspected malignant tumor of the biliary tract
- Acute pancreatitis
- Patient who has confirmed biliary stones in abdominal ultrasonography or CT
- Severe cholangitis according to TG 18 guideline
- Total bilirubin \> 4mg/dL
- Patients who have difficulty with EUS or ERCP due to previous gastric surgery (Billroth II or TG with R-en-Y)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Woo Hyun Paiklead
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 03080, South Korea
Related Publications (7)
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Banerjee S, Cash BD, Fisher L, Harrison ME, Fanelli RD, Fukami N, Ikenberry SO, Jain R, Khan K, Krinsky ML, Strohmeyer L, Dominitz JA. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jan;71(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.041. No abstract available.
PMID: 20105473BACKGROUNDHe H, Tan C, Wu J, Dai N, Hu W, Zhang Y, Laine L, Scheiman J, Kim JJ. Accuracy of ASGE high-risk criteria in evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Sep;86(3):525-532. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.01.039. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
PMID: 28174126BACKGROUNDTse F, Liu L, Barkun AN, Armstrong D, Moayyedi P. EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Feb;67(2):235-44. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.047.
PMID: 18226685BACKGROUNDGarrow D, Miller S, Sinha D, Conway J, Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH, Romagnuolo J. Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 May;5(5):616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.02.027.
PMID: 17478348BACKGROUNDDe Castro VL, Moura EG, Chaves DM, Bernardo WM, Matuguma SE, Artifon EL. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in suspected choledocholithiasis: A systematic review. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016 Mar-Apr;5(2):118-28. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.180476.
PMID: 27080611BACKGROUNDPolkowski M, Regula J, Tilszer A, Butruk E. Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a randomized trial comparing two management strategies. Endoscopy. 2007 Apr;39(4):296-303. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966264.
PMID: 17427065BACKGROUNDAdams MA, Hosmer AE, Wamsteker EJ, Anderson MA, Elta GH, Kubiliun NM, Kwon RS, Piraka CR, Scheiman JM, Waljee AK, Hussain HK, Elmunzer BJ. Predicting the likelihood of a persistent bile duct stone in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis: accuracy of existing guidelines and the impact of laboratory trends. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jul;82(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.023. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
PMID: 25792387BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Woo Hyun Paik, MD, PhD
Seoul National University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2017
First Posted
August 15, 2017
Study Start
July 25, 2017
Primary Completion
June 5, 2020
Study Completion
June 5, 2020
Last Updated
March 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03