Biweekly Versus Triweekly Raltitrexed With Oxaliplatin (With or Without Bevacizumab) in First-line Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
EROS
2 other identifiers
interventional
37
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Raltitrexed is a potent thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor. Conversely to 5-fluorouracil (5FU), raltitrexed can be administered safely in patients with cardiovascular disease, as well as in patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficit. Since raltitrexed is administered in 15-minutes infusion, complications related to continuous infusion can be avoided, and it becomes a potential good candidate for locoregional treatments as hepatic intra-arterial or intra-peritoneal infusion. Despite these potential benefits over 5FU, clinical trials failed in their temptation to replace the 5FU in colorectal cancer patients, mainly due to raltitrexed toxicity at 3mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Oxaliplatin has demonstrated a synergic effect when combined with TS inhibitors, and its association with raltitrexed was evaluated at 130mg/m2 of oxaliplatin and 3mg/m2 of raltitrexed, every 3 weeks. Actually, one of the first-line standard regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer patients is the biweekly FOLFOX (85mg/m2 of oxaliplatin, and infusional 5FU) plus bevacizumab regimen, since a significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit was observed over FOLFOX plus placebo. Biweekly administration of raltitrexed at 2mg/m2 demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile even in patients aged \>65 years. Besides, the association of raltitrexed, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab seems safe. Then, the investigators decided to perform a randomized pharmacokinetic comparative study between biweekly TOMOX (raltitrexed 2 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 85mg/m2) and triweekly TOMOX (raltitrexed 3 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130mg/m2) regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer patients, in a "ping-pong" crossover strategy to reduce the intra-individual variability. Bevacizumab was allowed at the dose of 5mg/kg or 7.5mg/kg, in biweekly and triweekly schedules, respectively. The secondary end-points were, objective response rate evaluated by RECIST 1.1 criteria, PFS, overall survival (OS), toxicity, and the comparison of toxicity between two arms for the first 2 cycles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2016
CompletedJuly 1, 2016
March 1, 2016
2.1 years
March 29, 2016
June 29, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evolution of Raltitrexed plasma levels
pharmacokinetic study
at 5 minutes, at 40 minutes, at 2 hours, at 7,5 hours, at 24 hours and at 14 days after each raltitrexed administration
Secondary Outcomes (4)
treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
3 months
objective response rate evaluated by RECIST 1.1 criteria
3 months
progression-free survival (PFS)
through study completion, an average of 2 years
overall survival (OS)
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Study Arms (2)
triweekly then biweekly
EXPERIMENTALThe arm A consisted of 2 cycles of triweekly TOMOX (standard dose 3mg/m2 of Raltitrexed in 15-minutes infusion, and 130mg/m2 of oxaliplatin in 2h infusion, every 3 weeks), followed by 2 cycles of biweekly TOMOX (2mg/m2 of Raltitrexed in 15-minutes infusion, and 85mg/m2 of oxaliplatin in 2h infusion, every 2 weeks).
biweekly then triweekly
EXPERIMENTALThe arm B consisted of the reserve sequence starting with 2 cycles of biweekly TOMOX followed by 2 cycles of triweekly TOMOX regimen.
Interventions
Bevacizumab was allowed and used at 7,5 mg/kg or 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- performance status (ECOG-PS) of 0 or 1
- patient with histologically proven colorectal cancer with distant metastases
- measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1
- life expectancy \> 12 months
- signed written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- prior chemotherapy at metastatic stage
- presence of brain or meningeal metastases
- other malignancies in the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix and squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
- preexisting peripheral neuropathy
- known hypersensitivity to any component of the study treatment
- any psychiatric condition compromising the understanding of information or conduct of the study
- pregnancy, breast-feeding or absence of adequate contraception for fertile patients
- patient under guardianship, curator or under the protection of justice
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHRU de Besançon
Besançon, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2016
First Posted
July 1, 2016
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03