Online Experimental Supermarket
SUPERNET
Impact of front-of Pack Nutrition Labels on Purchase Intentions in an Online Supermarket-A Series of Randomized Trials
1 other identifier
interventional
6,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Front-Of-Pack (FOP) nutrition labelling, providing simplified information on nutritional content at a glance, in order to help consumer make informed choices, has been identified as of major interest by public health specialists of many countries. French health authorities are currently considering the endorsement of a FOP nutrition label, but no specific format has yet been determined. A more simplified FOP nutrition label has been put forward in France, the 5-Colour Nutrition Label (5-CNL). Recent data suggests that the 5-CNL FOP label is well perceived and understood by consumers. The introduction of a FOP nutrition labelling system has been identified as challenging in certain population groups, due to their lower level of nutrition knowledge and unhealthier diets. The aim of the investigators is to evaluate the impact of FOP nutrition labels on the nutritional quality of the shopping cart in an online experimental supermarket in various nutritionally at-risk populations. Two FOP systems will be tested to a control situation without FOP labelling: the Reference Intakes (RI), currently in use by some manufacturers and present in a portion of food products sold in France, and the 5-Colour Nutrition Label (5-CNL). Three 3 arm parallel arm randomized trials are designed, each targeting a specific population. The methodology and interventions are identical across trials. Trials will be conducted in: 1) Working adults between 30-50 years old with low income, 2) Students and 3) Older subjects with identified chronic diseases. The intervention consists in the application of FOP nutrition labels on all food products, either the RI label, currently in use in some products in France, and the 5-CNL label. A control situation with no FOP will also be used. Participants will be asked to perform a shopping session in an experimental online supermarket, in one of the three experimental conditions described. The main outcome will be the overall nutritional quality of the shopping cart, assessed using the mean Food Standards Agency Nutrient profiling system score of the items in the shopping cart.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 3, 2017
September 1, 2017
9 months
May 9, 2016
September 29, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
FSA Score
Mean nutritional quality of the items in the shopping cart, using the mean Food Standards Agency nutrient profiling system (FSA score) of the items in the shopping cart. The FSA score for foods and beverages is computed taking into account nutrient content for 100g. It allocates positive points (0-10) for content in energy (KJ), total sugar (g), saturated fatty acids (g) and sodium (mg). Negative points (0-5) are allocated to content in fruits, vegetables, legumes and nuts (%), fibers (g) and proteins (g). Scores for foods and beverages were therefore based on a discrete continuous scale from -15 (most healthy) to +40 (less healthy). Modifications to the original score were used in order to ensure a higher consistency with French nutritional recommendations for beverages, cheese and added fats
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Calories (/100g)
3 months
Saturates (g/100g)
3 months
Sugar (g/100g)
3 months
Sodium (mg/100g)
3 months
Fibers (g/100g)
3 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group will not be exposed to any FOP nutrition labels
Front-of-pack labelling (Reference Intakes)
EXPERIMENTALThe second group will be exposed to a FOP nutrition label which is already in use on a portion of food products in France: the 'Reference Intakes' (RIs). The RIs are presented in the form of a chain of rectangles presenting the contribution of a portion of the product to a reference balanced diet of an average person (2000kcal) for each of the following nutrients: energy, lipids, saturated fat, sugars and sodium.
Front-of-pack labelling (5-CNL)
EXPERIMENTALThe 5-CNL was developed as a colour-coded summary system nutrition label, following the elements pointed out in reviews. The format of the 5-CNL system therefore includes five categories of nutritional quality of food products, ranging from green (Associated with the A grade) for foods of the highest nutritional quality to red (associated with the E grade), for products with lower nutritional quality. The format is presented in the form of a continuous chain of rectangles, each with its own letter/colour, the letter/colour corresponding to the product being enlarged.
Interventions
FOP nutrition label which is already in use on a portion of food products in France: the 'Reference Intakes' (RIs). The RIs are a chain of rectangles presenting the contribution of a portion of the product to a reference balanced diet of an average person (2000kcal) for each of the following nutrients: energy, lipids, saturated fat, sugars and sodium. The presentation of the products will always include the label affixed on it. Moreover, the product pages will include two pictures of the product: one with only the package (including the RI as FOP labelling), and a picture with both the package and a larger version of the label, so that it is more visible to the participant. These elements ensure higher visibility, awareness and understanding of the label.
The 5-CNL was developed as a colour-coded summary system nutrition label, following the elements pointed out in reviews. The format includes five categories, ranging from green (Associated with the A grade) for foods of the highest nutritional quality to red (associated with the E grade), for products with lower nutritional quality. The format is presented in the form of a continuous chain of rectangles, each with its own letter/colour, the one corresponding to the product being enlarged. The presentation of the products will always include the label affixed on it. Two pictures of the product will be included: one with only the package (including the 5-CNL as FOP labelling), and a picture with both the package and a larger version of the label, so that it is more visible to the participant.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects 30-50 years old
- Having finished their studies and currently active (either working or unemployed)
- Income/UC \<1200€/month
You may not qualify if:
- Student, retired
- Subjects living outside of mainland France
- Subjects never engaging in grocery shopping
- TRIAL N°2
- Subject 18-25 years old
- Self-declared as student
- Subjects never engaging in grocery shopping
- TRIAL N°3
- Subjects \>50 years-old
- Diagnosed with one or more of the following chronic conditions (self-reported) : type 2 diabetes, dislipidemia (elevated cholesterol levels, low HDL cholesterol levels, elevated triglycerides levels), hypertension, cardiovascular disease, obesity
- Subjects declaring suffering from none of the mentioned chronic conditions
- Subjects never engaging in grocery shopping
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Paris 13lead
- Intitut National du Cancercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Nutritionnelle
Bobigny, 93017, France
Related Publications (3)
Egnell M, Boutron I, Peneau S, Ducrot P, Touvier M, Galan P, Fezeu L, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Hercberg S, Kesse-Guyot E, Julia C. Impact of the Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition label on purchasing intentions of individuals with chronic diseases: results of a randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e058139. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058139.
PMID: 36038180DERIVEDEgnell M, Galan P, Fialon M, Touvier M, Peneau S, Kesse-Guyot E, Hercberg S, Julia C. The impact of the Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition label on purchasing intentions of unprocessed and processed foods: post-hoc analyses from three randomized controlled trials. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Mar 17;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01108-9.
PMID: 33731145DERIVEDEgnell M, Boutron I, Peneau S, Ducrot P, Touvier M, Galan P, Buscail C, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Hercberg S, Kesse-Guyot E, Julia C. Randomised controlled trial in an experimental online supermarket testing the effects of front-of-pack nutrition labelling on food purchasing intentions in a low-income population. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 8;11(2):e041196. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041196.
PMID: 33558350DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Serge Hercberg
Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2016
First Posted
May 11, 2016
Study Start
August 1, 2016
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share