NCT04165447

Brief Summary

The important role that diet plays in health and disease is well established, as is its association with rising rates of obesity-a phenomenon of increasing concern in Singapore. Changes in lifestyle patterns, including a movement towards a more western-style diet with an emphasis on pre-packaged and fast food, have contributed to the upward trend in weight. This study aims to test two competing approaches for calorie labelling in efforts to reduce total calories purchased. In Arm 1 (termed across category labelling) a low calorie logo will be displayed on the 20% of products on the web store that are lowest in calories per serving. Arm 2 will display this logo on the 20% of products that are lowest in calories per serving within each product category (termed within category labelling). Arm 3 is the Control condition which will not display any logo on any products. For our primary outcome, the investigators hypothesize that the proportion of labelled products (or those that would have been labelled if not in control arm) purchased in each intervention arm will be greater than in control. For secondary hypotheses the investigators expect the following ordering across the three (Control, Within category, Across category) arms:

  1. 1.total calories (adjusted for household size): C \> A \> W
  2. 2.calories per serving: C \> A \> W
  3. 3.calories per dollar spent: W \> A \> C
  4. 4.total dollars spent (adjusted for household size) : W \> A \> C

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
146

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2017

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2018

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 11, 2019

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 18, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

November 18, 2019

Status Verified

November 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

November 11, 2019

Last Update Submit

November 13, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

nutritionfront-of-pack labelcaloriesonline grocery storedietgroceriesobesity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of the basket represented by Lower Calorie products per shopping trip

    Proportion of products that are designated as labelled in the interventions

    Once a week for three weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Calories purchased per dollar spent per shopping trip

    Once a week for three weeks

  • Total spending per shopping trip

    Once a week for three weeks

  • Total calories purchased per shopping trip

    Once a week for three weeks

  • Calories per serving per shopping trip

    Once a week for three weeks

Study Arms (3)

No labeling Control

NO INTERVENTION

Arm 1 was the Control condition, which did not display the label on any products.

Within-category labeling

EXPERIMENTAL

Arm 2 displayed the label on the 20% of products that were lowest in calories per serving within each product category (termed Within-category Labeling, WC).

Behavioral: Front-of-pack labeling strategy

Across-category labeling

EXPERIMENTAL

Arm 3 displayed the label on the 20% of all products that were lowest in calories per serving (termed Across-category Labeling, AC).

Behavioral: Front-of-pack labeling strategy

Interventions

We designed a simple 'Lower Calorie' directive logo. We labeled the 20% of products with the lowest calories per serving within or across categories. All serving sizes used in this study were the average of the serving sizes within each category. Prior to conducting the analysis, we standardized the serving size by using the mean serving size within each subcategory. This standardization ensures that similar products are compared equally as serving sizes can be arbitrarily set by the manufacturers. The labels were displayed below the product images.

Across-category labelingWithin-category labeling

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 21 years and above
  • Primary grocery shopper for the household
  • Registered RedMart (an online grocery store) shoppers

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 21 years of age
  • Not the primary grocery shopper for the household
  • Not a resident in Singapore
  • Not a registered online shopper of RedMart

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Duke-NUS Medical School

Singapore, 169857, Singapore

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Finkelstein EA, Ang FJL, Doble B. Randomized trial evaluating the effectiveness of within versus across-category front-of-package lower-calorie labelling on food demand. BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8434-1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Food PreferencesObesity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Feeding BehaviorBehaviorOverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2019

First Posted

November 18, 2019

Study Start

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion

April 30, 2018

Study Completion

April 30, 2018

Last Updated

November 18, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All data will be de-identified.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Up to 10 years after study conclusion.
Access Criteria
Reasonable request.

Locations