Ultrasonography vs Cole Formula to Predict Endotracheal Tube Diameter
Comparison Between Ultrasonography and Cole Formula in Predicting Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube Diameter
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare the accuracy of measurement between ultrasonography and Cole formula in predicting uncuffed endotracheal tube diameter.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 3, 2017
March 1, 2017
2 months
April 26, 2016
March 1, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The accuracy proportion of USG and Cole Formula
Whether the USG measurement and Cole Formula measurement accurate or not will be recorded.
3 months
Study Arms (1)
Subjects
EXPERIMENTALUSG was used to measure the internal transversal subglottic diameter on the crichoid cartilago level while the head was in sniffing position. After USG measurement was recorded, Cole formula was used to measure internal diameter of uncuffed endotracheal tube.
Interventions
USG used was SonoSite® M-Turbo Bothell, WA, USA, probe linear (Array HFL 38 frekuensi 6-13 MHz). Internal subglottic diameter equals external diameter of the uncuffed endotracheal tube or trachea diameter, result rounded to the smallest uncuffed endotracheal tube size.
Internal diameter of the uncuffed endotracheal tube equals (age in years/4) + 4mm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects aged 1-6 years old, Malayan race, planned to undergo elective surgery with general anesthesia with intubation
- Subjects with ASA status I-II
- Cooperative subjects
- Subjects whose parents had signed the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with allergies to Ultrasonography jelly
- Subjects with difficult airway
- Subjects with mass in the neck area
- Subjects with respiratory diseases
- Subjects with growth \& development disorders
- Subjects with malnutrition (\<5% percentile) and obesity (\>95% percentile).
- Drop out criteria:
- Subjects with cardiorespiratory disorder during intubation
- Subjects who were failed to be intubated twice.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cipto Mangunkusumo Cental National Hospital
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
Related Publications (17)
Gupta K, Gupta PK, Rastogi B, Krishan A, Jain M, Garg G. Assessment of the subglottic region by ultrasonography for estimation of appropriate size endotracheal tube: A clinical prospective study. Anesth Essays Res. 2012 Jul-Dec;6(2):157-60. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.108298.
PMID: 25885609BACKGROUNDPark HP, Hwang JW, Lee JH, Nahm FS, Park SH, Oh AY, Jeon YT, Lim YJ. Predicting the appropriate uncuffed endotracheal tube size for children: a radiograph-based formula versus two age-based formulas. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Aug;25(5):384-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
PMID: 23965215BACKGROUNDCOLE F. Pediatric formulas for the anesthesiologist. AMA J Dis Child. 1957 Dec;94(6):672-3. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1957.04030070084009. No abstract available.
PMID: 13478300BACKGROUNDEipe N, Barrowman N, Writer H, Doherty D. A weight-based formula for tracheal tube size in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Apr;19(4):343-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02916.x. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
PMID: 19178655BACKGROUNDvan den Berg AA, Mphanza T. Choice of tracheal tube size for children: finger size or age-related formula? Anaesthesia. 1997 Jul;52(7):701-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.az0130c.x.
PMID: 9254579BACKGROUNDShibasaki M, Nakajima Y, Ishii S, Shimizu F, Shime N, Sessler DI. Prediction of pediatric endotracheal tube size by ultrasonography. Anesthesiology. 2010 Oct;113(4):819-24. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ef6757.
PMID: 20808208BACKGROUNDBae JY, Byon HJ, Han SS, Kim HS, Kim JT. Usefulness of ultrasound for selecting a correctly sized uncuffed tracheal tube for paediatric patients. Anaesthesia. 2011 Nov;66(11):994-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06900.x. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
PMID: 21933159BACKGROUNDSchramm C, Knop J, Jensen K, Plaschke K. Role of ultrasound compared to age-related formulas for uncuffed endotracheal intubation in a pediatric population. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Aug;22(8):781-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03889.x. Epub 2012 May 21.
PMID: 22612446BACKGROUNDDelilkan AE. Choice of endotracheal tube in the Malaysian paediatric patient--a guide. Singapore Med J. 1973 Mar;14(1):26-8. No abstract available.
PMID: 4713016BACKGROUNDZahedi-Nejad N, Bakhshayesh-Karam M, Kahkoei S, Abbasi-Dezfoully A, Masjedi MR. Normal dimensions of trachea and two main bronchi in the Iranian population. Pol J Radiol. 2011 Oct;76(4):28-31.
PMID: 22802851BACKGROUNDMi W, Zhang C, Wang H, Cao J, Li C, Yang L, Guo F, Wang X, Yang T. Measurement and analysis of the tracheobronchial tree in Chinese population using computed tomography. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0123177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123177. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25894917BACKGROUNDAdewale L. Anatomy and assessment of the pediatric airway. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Jul;19 Suppl 1:1-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03012.x.
PMID: 19572839BACKGROUNDPrasad A, Yu E, Wong DT, Karkhanis R, Gullane P, Chan VW. Comparison of sonography and computed tomography as imaging tools for assessment of airway structures. J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Jul;30(7):965-72. doi: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.7.965.
PMID: 21705729BACKGROUNDSingh M, Chin KJ, Chan VW, Wong DT, Prasad GA, Yu E. Use of sonography for airway assessment: an observational study. J Ultrasound Med. 2010 Jan;29(1):79-85. doi: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.1.79.
PMID: 20040778BACKGROUNDPrasanna Kumar S, Ravikumar A. Biometric study of the internal dimensions of subglottis and upper trachea in adult Indian population. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jan;66(Suppl 1):261-6. doi: 10.1007/s12070-012-0477-x. Epub 2012 Jan 21.
PMID: 24533395BACKGROUNDCROTEAU JR, COOK CD. Volume-pressure and length-tension measurements in human tracheal and bronchial segments. J Appl Physiol. 1961 Jan;16:170-2. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1961.16.1.170. No abstract available.
PMID: 13696635BACKGROUNDGriscom NT, Wohl ME. Dimensions of the growing trachea related to age and gender. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Feb;146(2):233-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.146.2.233.
PMID: 3484568BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aida R Tantri, Consultant
Indonesia University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant, Anesthesiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2016
First Posted
April 28, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2016
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03