NCT03073408

Brief Summary

The action of anesthetics such as propofol is not immediate after intravenous administration. Delay in pharmacodynamic effect of intravenous drugs is a commonly observed phenomenon in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). On the other hand, the measure of the clinical effect of propofol by EEG processed monitors like the bispectral index (BIS) also requires some processing time for the analysis of the recorded signal. Thus, the resulting BIS value provided by the monitor is affected by a delay. When a BIS based controller is used, the propofol infusion rates are defined using information of the BIS signal available. The delay in the BIS signal is an important issue as it can affect the performance of the controller. There are scarce contributions to address the delay in automatic administration of anesthesia. Our proposal to deal with the dead time in the control action of the hypnotic component of anesthesia is a proportional-integral (PI) algorithm with a Smith predictor. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the feasibility and effectiveness of a closed-loop control using the Smith predictor versus manual control for propofol administration guided by the bispectral index (BIS) in adults patients. The objective is to show that a closed loop control can be a useful tool to provide safe and effective intravenous anesthesia and that the use of specific controller for delay rejection is a reliable strategy.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 24, 2017

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 6, 2017

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 8, 2017

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 15, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 15, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

March 8, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

February 24, 2017

Last Update Submit

March 3, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

PropofolBispectral index (BIS)Closed loop

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluation of the performance of the 2 groups with the global score (GS).

    Global score is a calculated parameter which gives an idea of the overall performance of a closed-loop system. It is calculated as the sum of MDAPE and wobble divided by the fraction of time BIS was within ±10 of the target. The target BIS chosen will be 50. The GS is calculated according the formula: GS = (MDAPE + wobble)/ % of time with BIS between 40 and 60

    During anesthesia maintenance, approximately 9 hours

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • The percentage of time with BIS values within +/10 % of target BIS.

    During anesthesia maintenance, approximately 9 hours

  • MDPE (median performance error)

    During anesthesia maintenance, approximately 9 hours

  • MDAPE (median absolute performance error):

    During anesthesia maintenance, approximately 9 hours

  • Wobble

    During anesthesia maintenance, approximately 9 hours

  • Time to eyes opening

    30 minutes after the end of the anesthesia

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

1: Manual control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The propofol infusion rate is adjusted manually in a pump by the investigator to maintain BIS between 40 and 60. For this titration it is necessary continuous monitoring, clinical experience, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic knowledge.

Drug: Propofol

2: PI +Smith group

EXPERIMENTAL

The closed loop control automatically adjust propofol infusion rate guided by the feedback of the real value of BIS. The automatic system has to achieve a target BIS of 50 and maintain it between 40 and 60.

Drug: Propofol

Interventions

Closed loop control for propofol administration guided by the BIS.

2: PI +Smith group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • years of age or older
  • Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) as I or II
  • Elective surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia with an estimated duration \> 30 minutes

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant women,
  • Patients with neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • Patients taking any medication known to influence the EEG and subsequently the BIS

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Universitario de Canarias

San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38320, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Propofol

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Parallel Assignment
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2017

First Posted

March 8, 2017

Study Start

March 6, 2017

Primary Completion

September 15, 2017

Study Completion

September 15, 2017

Last Updated

March 8, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations