Design of a Closed-loop Controller Based on the Bispectral Index (BIS) Effectiveness of the Smith Predictor
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The action of anesthetics such as propofol is not immediate after intravenous administration. Delay in pharmacodynamic effect of intravenous drugs is a commonly observed phenomenon in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). On the other hand, the measure of the clinical effect of propofol by EEG processed monitors like the bispectral index (BIS) also requires some processing time for the analysis of the recorded signal. Thus, the resulting BIS value provided by the monitor is affected by a delay. When a BIS based controller is used, the propofol infusion rates are defined using information of the BIS signal available. The delay in the BIS signal is an important issue as it can affect the performance of the controller. There are scarce contributions to address the delay in automatic administration of anesthesia. Our proposal to deal with the dead time in the control action of the hypnotic component of anesthesia is a proportional-integral (PI) algorithm with a Smith predictor. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the feasibility and effectiveness of a closed-loop control using the Smith predictor versus manual control for propofol administration guided by the bispectral index (BIS) in adults patients. The objective is to show that a closed loop control can be a useful tool to provide safe and effective intravenous anesthesia and that the use of specific controller for delay rejection is a reliable strategy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2017
CompletedMarch 8, 2017
March 1, 2017
6 months
February 24, 2017
March 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of the performance of the 2 groups with the global score (GS).
Global score is a calculated parameter which gives an idea of the overall performance of a closed-loop system. It is calculated as the sum of MDAPE and wobble divided by the fraction of time BIS was within ±10 of the target. The target BIS chosen will be 50. The GS is calculated according the formula: GS = (MDAPE + wobble)/ % of time with BIS between 40 and 60
During anesthesia maintenance, approximately 9 hours
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The percentage of time with BIS values within +/10 % of target BIS.
During anesthesia maintenance, approximately 9 hours
MDPE (median performance error)
During anesthesia maintenance, approximately 9 hours
MDAPE (median absolute performance error):
During anesthesia maintenance, approximately 9 hours
Wobble
During anesthesia maintenance, approximately 9 hours
Time to eyes opening
30 minutes after the end of the anesthesia
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1: Manual control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe propofol infusion rate is adjusted manually in a pump by the investigator to maintain BIS between 40 and 60. For this titration it is necessary continuous monitoring, clinical experience, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic knowledge.
2: PI +Smith group
EXPERIMENTALThe closed loop control automatically adjust propofol infusion rate guided by the feedback of the real value of BIS. The automatic system has to achieve a target BIS of 50 and maintain it between 40 and 60.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ability to provide informed consent
- years of age or older
- Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) as I or II
- Elective surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia with an estimated duration \> 30 minutes
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women,
- Patients with neurological or psychiatric disorders
- Patients taking any medication known to influence the EEG and subsequently the BIS
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- José Antonio Reboso Moraleslead
- University of La Lagunacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38320, Spain
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2017
First Posted
March 8, 2017
Study Start
March 6, 2017
Primary Completion
September 15, 2017
Study Completion
September 15, 2017
Last Updated
March 8, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share