Loading search results
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Study Start
October 2016
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
December 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
December 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Identification of the embryo with the highest potential to implant and establish an ongoing pregnancy is a primary aim in human assisted reproduction. This task is undertaken every day by embryologists worldwide during the treatment of couples that wish to conceive by IVF. The optimal scenario is the transfer of a single embryo which gives rise to a singleton pregnancy. The current limitations in determination of embryos that have the highest implantation potential probably contribute to the low rates of pregnancy during IVF treatments. Hence, since the beginning of IVF, how to improve embryo selection has been a 'hot research topic.' Morphology has been a very obvious parameter to assess embryos as it provides a chance to evaluate them from the oocyte stage all the way to the blastocysts stage. Hence, in the first era of IVF, there were number of studies that evaluated this parameter and associated morphology with IVF success rates. On the other hand, it has been previously stated that the slight increase in pregnancy rates during IVF treatment is mostly likely a result of better practices in laboratory than morphological evaluation. Due to the limitations of morphological evaluation, several researchers have investigated adjunctive non-invasive approaches for the assessment of the embryo, such as the metabolomic profiling. Recently mass spectroscopic (MS) approaches have been utilized in limited settings. Samples needed minimal preparation; analytical analysis was rapid and large amounts of data was available. Hence, MS might be a promising approach for metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
February 29, 2016
Actual (reported)March 3, 2016
Actual (reported)October 2016
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
December 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
December 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Clinical Pregnancy
Clinical pregnancy will be defined as the presence of a fetal heartbeat using vaginal ultrasound at 6 weeks of amenorrhoea.
3 months
Embryos will be morphologically evaluated according to the number and regularity of blastomeres and fragmentation degree. Only embryo culture media of good quality embryos (embryos with ≥6 cells with no fragmentation) will be included in the study
Embryos will be morphologically evaluated according to the number and regularity of blastomeres and fragmentation degree. Only embryo culture media of good quality embryos (embryos with ≥6 cells with no fragmentation) will be included in the study. After dilution, embryo culture media will be analyzed by electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight (ESI-QTOF) MS. The spectra will be collected in the negative ion mode. Abundance of ions in each spectrum will be further analyzed.
Istanbul University School of Medicine
Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)
Ercan Bastu, M.D.
Istanbul University School of Medicine
First Submitted
February 29, 2016
First Posted
March 3, 2016
Study Start
October 2016
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
December 2017
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
December 2017
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
August 30, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: