The Importance of Embryo Transfer Day Progesterone Value in Natural Cycle Frozen Embryo Transfers and the Evaluation of the Effect of Rescue Therapy on Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients With Low Progesterone Levels
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Thanks to recent advances in clinical practice and laboratory, embryo cryopreservation has become the first-line procedure in assisted reproductive technology. Improved laboratory techniques have increased the number of available embryos derived from an in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle. Implementation of a single embryo transfer policy to improve vitrification, improve postwarm embryo survival rates, and reduce multiple pregnancies without reducing cumulative birth rates has contributed to an increase in the number of frozen-warms (1,2) Embryo freezing; It is becoming an adopted practice for an increasing number of indications, including prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), late follicular phase progesterone elevation, and embryo-endometrial asynchrony. In our study, we are investigating the effect of pre-transfer serum progesterone levels on pregnancy outcomes in patients who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer.Supplementary progesterone preparations can be used to prevent luteal phase defect and to provide progesterone support in cycle preparations for frozen-thawed embryo transfer(3). The aim in this study is to show the effect of serum progesterone level on the pregnancy results on the day of embryo transfer in natural cycles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 8, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedSeptember 1, 2023
August 1, 2023
1.3 years
July 28, 2022
August 31, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical pregnancy rates
fetal heartbeat by transvaginal ultrasound
average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Ongoing pregnancy rate
average of 15 month
Miscarriage
average of 15 month
Study Arms (2)
Normal Progesterone group
EXPERIMENTALProgesterone level ≥ 10 ng/mL on ET day.
Low Progesterone group
ACTIVE COMPARATORProgesterone level \<10 ng/mL on ET day. Grup a Rescue vaginal progesterone, Grup b Rescue subcutan progesterone
Interventions
Progesterone level \<10 ng/mL on ET day. If serum progesterone levels were \<10 ng/ml at ET day, vaginal pills (Lutinus 2\*1) or SC progesterone daily (Prolutex) was given to patients and ET was performed on the same day. Progesterone supplementation was discontinued if there was no pregnancy. Progesterone supplementation at the same dose was continued until 10 gestational weeks for viable pregnancies.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women between the ages of 20-42 who applied to the infertility clinic
- BMI\<30
You may not qualify if:
- Severe male factor (Sperm count \<5 ml/ml, progressively motile sperm count \<10%)
- Intrauterine structural anomalies not corrected by surgery
- Hydrosalpenx if not underwent surgery
- Refusal to participate in the study
- cycle cancelation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Acıbadem Ataşehir Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Bezmialem Foundation University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Novaart IVF and Women's Health Center
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, Vanderpoel S, Racowsky C. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):139-155. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038.
PMID: 27827818RESULTLoutradi KE, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Pados G, Bontis I, Tarlatzis BC. Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2008 Jul;90(1):186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.010. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
PMID: 17980870RESULTGroenewoud ER, Cohlen BJ, Macklon NS. Programming the endometrium for deferred transfer of cryopreserved embryos: hormone replacement versus modified natural cycles. Fertil Steril. 2018 May;109(5):768-774. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.135.
PMID: 29778369RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
pınar özcan, PhD
Bezmialem Foundation University
- STUDY CHAIR
Cem Demirel, PhD
Acıbadem Ataşehir Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Mehmet Erdem, PhD
Novaart IVF and Women's Health Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2022
First Posted
August 1, 2022
Study Start
August 8, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
September 1, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share