Effect of Furosemide Withdraw in Stable Chronic Heart Failure Outpatients
ReBIC-1
1 other identifier
interventional
230
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The ReBIC-1 trial was designed to evaluate the potential clinical risks and benefits of withdrawing furosemide use in stable, apparently euvolemic, chronic HF outpatients in a multicentric double-blinded randomized clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 heart-failure
Started May 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 25, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 23, 2016
February 1, 2016
2 years
November 25, 2015
February 22, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Feasibility of furosemide withdraw - proportion of patients maintained without diuretic during follow-up
Proportion of patients maintained without diuretic during follow-up
90 days
Safety of furosemide withdraw - dyspnea score variation assessed by a visual analog scale
Dyspnea score variation assessed by a visual analog scale after randomization
90 days
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Variation of plasmatic levels of natriuretic peptides
Baseline and 90 days
Variation in meters walked assessed by the 6 minute walking test
Baseline and 90 days
Variation in renal function
Baseline, 15, 45 and 90 days
Variation on the Clinical Congestion Score
Baseline, 15, 45 and 90 days
Clinical composite endpoints
90 days
Study Arms (2)
Withdraw of furosemide
PLACEBO COMPARATORWithdraw of of 40 or 80 mg of furosemide per day
Maintenance of furosemide
ACTIVE COMPARATORMaintenance of 40 or 80 mg of furosemide per day
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cardiovascular Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903, Brazil
Related Publications (8)
Lip GY, Gibbs CR, Beevers DG. ABC of heart failure: aetiology. BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):104-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.104. No abstract available.
PMID: 10625270BACKGROUNDMcMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jaarsma T, Kober L, Lip GY, Maggioni AP, Parkhomenko A, Pieske BM, Popescu BA, Ronnevik PK, Rutten FH, Schwitter J, Seferovic P, Stepinska J, Trindade PT, Voors AA, Zannad F, Zeiher A; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2012 Jul;33(14):1787-847. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs104. Epub 2012 May 19. No abstract available.
PMID: 22611136BACKGROUNDWRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS; Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL; American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013 Oct 15;128(16):e240-327. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31829e8776. Epub 2013 Jun 5. No abstract available.
PMID: 23741058BACKGROUNDCowley AJ, Stainer K, Wynne RD, Rowley JM, Hampton JR. Symptomatic assessment of patients with heart failure: double-blind comparison of increasing doses of diuretics and captopril in moderate heart failure. Lancet. 1986 Oct 4;2(8510):770-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90298-9.
PMID: 2876233BACKGROUNDEshaghian S, Horwich TB, Fonarow GC. Relation of loop diuretic dose to mortality in advanced heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Jun 15;97(12):1759-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.12.072. Epub 2006 Apr 27.
PMID: 16765130BACKGROUNDMielniczuk LM, Tsang SW, Desai AS, Nohria A, Lewis EF, Fang JC, Baughman KL, Stevenson LW, Givertz MM. The association between high-dose diuretics and clinical stability in ambulatory chronic heart failure patients. J Card Fail. 2008 Jun;14(5):388-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.01.015. Epub 2008 May 27.
PMID: 18514930BACKGROUNDBlacher M, Zimerman A, Engster PHB, Grespan E, Polanczyk CA, Rover MM, Neto JAF, Danzmann LC, Bertoldi EG, Simoes MV, Beck-da-Silva L, Biolo A, Rohde LE. Revisiting heart failure assessment based on objective measures in NYHA functional classes I and II. Heart. 2021 Sep;107(18):1487-1492. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317984. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
PMID: 33361353DERIVEDRohde LE, Rover MM, Figueiredo Neto JA, Danzmann LC, Bertoldi EG, Simoes MV, Silvestre OM, Ribeiro ALP, Moura LZ, Beck-da-Silva L, Prado D, Sant'Anna RT, Bridi LH, Zimerman A, Raupp da Rosa P, Biolo A. Short-term diuretic withdrawal in stable outpatients with mild heart failure and no fluid retention receiving optimal therapy: a double-blind, multicentre, randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2019 Nov 21;40(44):3605-3612. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz554.
PMID: 31424503DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Luis Eduardo Rohde, PHD
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2015
First Posted
February 23, 2016
Study Start
May 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02