NCT02615509

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare the safety and clinical performance of the Philips MicroDose Tomosynthesis system images and images from FFDM systems.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
347

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2016

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 12, 2015

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 26, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2016

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 20, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 20, 2018

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 8, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 8, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

November 12, 2015

Results QC Date

April 23, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 23, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

MammographyTomosynthesis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To Compare the Clinical Performance of the Philips MicroDose Tomosynthesis System Images to Conventional 2D Mammography Images. Clinical Performance Will be Based on the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve.

    Due to study termination the conventional images where not taken and it was not possible to calculate the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curve. Instead we are reporting the biopsy results from the Philips MicroDose Tomosynthesis system. The time frame from examination to biopsy is documented as an estimate based on the relative urgency to detect potential tumors.

    Up to approximately 4 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Compare Average Glandular Dose Between FDDM and Philips Tomosynthesis System

    Nine months image accrual

  • Compare Non-cancer Recall Rates Between FDDM and Philips Tomosynthesis System.

    Nine months image accrual

  • Compare Sensitivity Between FDDM and Philips Tomosynthesis System, Sensitivity Will be Estimated for Each Reader as the Proportion of Cancer Cases With Per-case BI-RADS Category 4 or Higher.

    One year follow up will be performed on negative patients

  • Compare Specificity Between FDDM and Philips Tomosynthesis System. Specificity Will be Estimated by Reader as the Proportion of Non-cancer Cases With Per-case BI-RADS Category Less Than 4.

    One year follow up will be performed on negative patients

Study Arms (1)

Imaging on experimental tomo device

OTHER

Women will have a bilateral two-view mammogram (a total of four images) with the Philips MicroDose Tomosynthesis system and a bilateral two-view mammogram (a total of four images) with an FFDM system. The order of this will be randomised. After collecting the cases together with ground truth a readers study will be performed.

Radiation: Imaging on experimental tomo device

Interventions

The system used for imaging in the experimental arm is the Philips MicroDose tomography system. The system used for imaging in the active comparator is a standard FFDM system

Imaging on experimental tomo device

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient is female and at least 40 years of age
  • No contraindication for routine bilateral mammography
  • Screening Cohort
  • Patient presents for a routine screening mammogram Biopsy Cohort
  • Patient is scheduled for a biopsy
  • Patient has a screening detected abnormality

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient is pregnant or believes she may be pregnant; OR,
  • Patient is breast feeding; OR
  • Patient is unable or unwilling to give informed consent, including consent to reuse data for future research; OR,
  • Patient has breast implants; OR
  • Patient has previous surgical biopsy; OR
  • Patient has previous breast cancer; OR
  • Patient presented to screening with clinical symptoms (e.g. palpable lump, nipple discharge, nipple retraction, skin irritation or dimpling)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-6830, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Daniel Stenströmer
Organization
Philips AB

Study Officials

  • Etta Pisano, PhD

    Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2015

First Posted

November 26, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion

February 20, 2018

Study Completion

February 20, 2018

Last Updated

May 8, 2020

Results First Posted

May 8, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No individual participant data will be shared with researchers outside the company or otherwise engaged in the study.

Locations