NCT02685566

Brief Summary

The purpose of this pilot is to assess the adequacy of the Fujifilm DBT Reader Study Training program to ensure that Readers participating in the Fujifilm DBT pivotal trial are properly trained in the reading and interpretation of FFDM and DBT images.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2015

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 17, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 18, 2016

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 9, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 21, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

August 17, 2015

Results QC Date

May 11, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 15, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Mammography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessing Adequacy of Training - Cancer Detection Threshold & Recall Rate

    This endpoint was evaluated qualitatively. Reported the number of readers meeting the Pass Criteria on the final FFDM plus DBT assessment case set, which requires adequate performance in cancer cases (detection rate) as well as non-cancer cases (recall rate). Per-subject BI-RADS, POM and recall scores were derived. Credit was only given for identifying a subject with cancer if the reader marked findings in at least one location with cancer. Findings that did not match the location of a malignant lesion were ignored for cancer cases in the per-subject analyses.

    4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Area Under Curve (AUC) ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) Based on Per-subject Probability of Malignancy (POM) Scores Requiring Correct Lesion Localization.

    5 weeks

Study Arms (2)

FFDM Plus DBT

EXPERIMENTAL

Breast Images with FFDM and DBT

Device: FFDM Plus DBT

Full-Field Digital Mammography

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Breast Images with FFDM alone

Device: FFDM

Interventions

FujiFilm Aspire Cristalle System

FFDM Plus DBT
FFDMDEVICE

FujiFilm Aspire Cristalle System

Full-Field Digital Mammography

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female subjects participating in FMSU004A protocol with known clinical status

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects with unknown clinical status not participating in FMSU004A protocol.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Limited (SMIL)

Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258, United States

Location

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, LLC (EWBC)

Rochester, New York, 14620, United States

Location

University of North Carolina - at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

Location

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

Mammography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RadiographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosis

Results Point of Contact

Title
Randy Vader
Organization
Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.

Study Officials

  • Robert M Uzenoff

    Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2015

First Posted

February 18, 2016

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion

August 1, 2015

Study Completion

October 1, 2015

Last Updated

September 21, 2023

Results First Posted

June 9, 2020

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations