Pilot Mammography Reader Study to Assess Breast Cancer Detection in FFDM Plus DBT Versus FFDM Alone
A Multi-Reader Multi-Case Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Comparative Accuracy of the Fujifilm Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) Plus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) Versus FFDM Alone in the Detection of Breast Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this pilot is to provide credible performance estimate information in order to conduct subsequent reader studies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Jun 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable breast-cancer
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 4, 2020
CompletedSeptember 21, 2023
September 1, 2023
Same day
July 23, 2015
April 14, 2020
September 15, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare Per Subject Area Under Curve (AUC): FFDM Only vs DBT Plus FFDM
Breast AUC performance metrics to determine if FFDM plus DBT improved cancer detection rate, requiring correct lesion localization. Statistician to estimate AUCs for each reader in each review condition (FFDM read in conjunction with FFDM plus DBT read) based on their Probability of Malignancy (POM) scores. POM scores will require correct lesion localization, such that in a case with cancer if the reader recorded one or more findings in the case but none of them are determined by the truther to match the location(s) of any proven malignancies, a POM score of 0 will be assigned to the case. Statistician to provide graphical representations of each reader's ROC curve for each review condition. For each reader the difference between the AUC for the FFDM read in conjunction with the FFDM plus DBT will be presented. Statistician to perform MRMC comparison of AUC's between FFDM read in conjunction with FFDM plus DBT using the MRMC method of Dorfman, Berbaum \& Metz (1992).
1 month
Study Arms (2)
FFDM Plus DBT
EXPERIMENTALBreast Images with FFDM and DBT
FFDM Alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORBreast Images with FFDM alone
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female subjects participating in FMSU004A protocol with known clinical status
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with unknown clinical status not participating in FMSU004A protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Limited (SMIL)
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258, United States
Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, LLC (EWBC)
Rochester, New York, 14620, United States
University of North Carolina - at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Randy Vader
- Organization
- Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Robert M Uzenoff
Fujifilm Medical Systems USA, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2015
First Posted
July 30, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 21, 2023
Results First Posted
June 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2023-09