Evaluation of the Efficacy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Imaging
DBT
Multi-center Case Collection Study to Create a Library of Images From Various Approved FFDM Systems and 3D Images From Siemens Inspiration Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) System for Studies in Support of the Inspiration DBT Approval
1 other identifier
interventional
764
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this protocol is to collect the 2-dimensional (2D) screening and diagnostic images, and 3-dimensional (3D) Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) scans from patient mammography examinations acquired on various commercially available Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) systems and the Siemens Inspiration DBT system, respectively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started May 2011
Typical duration for not_applicable breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 13, 2017
CompletedAugust 7, 2020
September 1, 2019
3 years
June 13, 2011
April 27, 2016
August 5, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy Based on the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve in Breasts Analyzed With DBT as an Adjunct to FFDM vs. FFDM Alone
The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of DBT and FFDM images together in comparison to FFDM images alone with respect to the ability of readers to detect and diagnose malignant lesions. A comparison of the breast-level ROC areas was used to evaluate the superiority of DBT as an adjunct to FFDM vs. FFDM alone.
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Mammography exam
OTHERSiemens DBT scan
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All subjects enrolled into the collection study must:
- Provide signed informed consent after receiving a verbal and written explanation of the purpose and nature of the study
- be females, 40 years of age or older at the screening mammographic evaluation or age 30 or older presenting for a biopsy and have one of the following mammograms:
- o Normal cases at screening (BI-RADS® 1, 2 and 3):
- have a screening mammogram that includes the four standard screening views (RCC, RMLO, LCC and LMLO), as well as have both MLO and CC DBT scans of each breast,
- o Actionable cases at screening (BI-RADS® 0, 4 or 5) with final BI-RADS® 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5:
- have a screening mammogram with four SSVs and any clinically necessary diagnostic mammographic views, such as straight lateral projections, rolled, magnification view and spot compression views, and, both MLO and CC DBT scans of each breast plus 4 SSVs repeated at the diagnostic or biopsy visit if the screening images are unavailable or were acquired more than 45 days prior to DBT acquisition,
- have supporting ground-truth documentation for the final BI-RADS® assessment as follows:
- A one (1) year FFDM follow up without evidence of cancer for normal cases not undergoing biopsy
- A six (6) or twelve (12) month FFDM follow up confirming benign status for biopsy proven benign cases
- Pathology report for either benign or malignant biopsy finding
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects with any of the following conditions or who have had the following procedures will be excluded from this study:
- Pregnant women or women who believe they may be pregnant or are trying to become pregnant.
- Mastectomy patients
- Subjects who have had lumpectomy ≤ 5 years prior to the study entry
- Inmates (in accordance with 45 CFR 46.306) or mentally disabled individuals
- BI-RADS® Category 6 (e.g., for which the mammogram was performed for the purpose of planning cancer therapy)
- BI-RADS® Category 4 or 5 without confirming pathology reports will be considered incomplete
- Subjects with mammograms that lack the required views or with views judged to be technically inadequate will be considered incomplete and the cases will not be considered for the MRMC reader studies
- Subjects being accrued from the screening population who know that they will not be in the United States or available for follow up mammograms in one year.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Siemens Medical Solutions
Malvern, Pennsylvania, 19355, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
Study Officials
Agnes Lazar
Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2011
First Posted
June 15, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
August 7, 2020
Results First Posted
January 13, 2017
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share