NCT02610647

Brief Summary

The main objective of this study is to compare between groups the level of complexity of the estimated sensorimotor performance through multi-fractal (minmaxMF-DFA) exponents.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 18, 2015

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 20, 2015

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 6, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

November 19, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

November 18, 2015

Last Update Submit

November 17, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • minmaxMF-DFA value during the tapping test

    The level of complexity of the estimated sensorimotor performance as measured by the multi-fractal exponents.

    Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Coefficient of variation

    Day 0

  • αDFA value during the tapping test

    Day 0

Study Arms (5)

Control group

OTHER

Subjects randomized to this group will have a tapping test with no sensory blocking. Intervention: Tapping test

Other: Tapping test

Wrist anesthesia

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia followed by a tapping test. Intervention: Wrist anesthesia Intervention: Tapping test

Drug: Wrist anesthesiaOther: Tapping test

Wrist anesthesia, masked

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia, will wear a blinding mask, and then will perform a tapping test. Intervention: Wrist anesthesia Intervention: Blinding mask Intervention: Tapping test

Drug: Wrist anesthesiaOther: Blinding maskOther: Tapping test

Wrist anesthesia, helmet

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia, will wear an anti-noise helmet, and then will perform a tapping test. Intervention: Wrist anesthesia Intervention: Anti-noise helmet Intervention: Tapping test

Drug: Wrist anesthesiaOther: Anti-noise helmetOther: Tapping test

Wrist anesthesia, masked & helmet

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia, will wear a blinding mask, will wear an anti-noise helmet, and then will perform a tapping test. Intervention: Wrist anesthesia Intervention: Blinding mask Intervention: Anti-noise helmet Intervention: Tapping test

Drug: Wrist anesthesiaOther: Blinding maskOther: Anti-noise helmetOther: Tapping test

Interventions

Prior to the tapping test, regional anesthesia is performed in the form of sensory blocks distal to the wrist: injection of ropivacaine 7.5mg / ml is carried out successively in contact with three nerves (ulnar, median and radial) with a volume of 2 ml for nerve, for a total of 45mg.

Wrist anesthesiaWrist anesthesia, helmetWrist anesthesia, maskedWrist anesthesia, masked & helmet

Patients will don a mask that prevents them from seeing during the tapping test.

Wrist anesthesia, maskedWrist anesthesia, masked & helmet

Patients will don a helmet that prevents them from hearing during the tapping test.

Wrist anesthesia, helmetWrist anesthesia, masked & helmet

Subjects will be placed at a table in a sitting position where they will perform a rhythmic finger tapping test. The seat height is adjusted so that the front dominant arm rests comfortably on the table. Subjects will be equipped with headphones to receive auditory signals during a first synchronized phase of tapping. After the last auditory signal, participants will continue the tapping task by themselves as directed: "after the metronome stops,continue tapping the prescribed tempo as accurately and consistently as possible throughout the test." The movements of the index finger will be measured by a single-axis accelerometer (15 × 15 mm) attached to the nail.

Control groupWrist anesthesiaWrist anesthesia, helmetWrist anesthesia, maskedWrist anesthesia, masked & helmet

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The subject does not practice music intensively (\<1h / day on average)

You may not qualify if:

  • The patient is participating in another study
  • The patient is under judicial protection, or under guardianship
  • The patient refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
  • The subject regularly practices music
  • The subject is suffering from a neurodegenerative disease of the central or peripheral nervous system which may affect the sensorimotor control of rhythmic movements of the upper limb
  • The subject has had a recent trauma of the upper limb
  • The subject is suffering from uncorrected visual and hearing impairment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Laboratoire Movement to Health (M2H), Euromov, Université Montpellier 1

Montpellier, 34090, France

Location

CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie

Montpellier, 34295, France

Location

CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

Nîmes, 30029, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Torre K, Vergotte G, Viel E, Perrey S, Dupeyron A. Fractal properties in sensorimotor variability unveil internal adaptations of the organism before symptomatic functional decline. Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 31;9(1):15736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52091-y.

Study Officials

  • Kjerstin Torre, MD, PhD

    Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2015

First Posted

November 20, 2015

Study Start

June 6, 2017

Primary Completion

August 31, 2017

Study Completion

August 31, 2017

Last Updated

November 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2018-01

Locations