Functional Significance of Complexity Measures in the Sensory-motor Behavior
NEURO COMP
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to compare between groups the level of complexity of the estimated sensorimotor performance through multi-fractal (minmaxMF-DFA) exponents.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers
Started Jun 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2017
CompletedNovember 19, 2025
January 1, 2018
3 months
November 18, 2015
November 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
minmaxMF-DFA value during the tapping test
The level of complexity of the estimated sensorimotor performance as measured by the multi-fractal exponents.
Day 0
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Coefficient of variation
Day 0
αDFA value during the tapping test
Day 0
Study Arms (5)
Control group
OTHERSubjects randomized to this group will have a tapping test with no sensory blocking. Intervention: Tapping test
Wrist anesthesia
EXPERIMENTALSubjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia followed by a tapping test. Intervention: Wrist anesthesia Intervention: Tapping test
Wrist anesthesia, masked
EXPERIMENTALSubjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia, will wear a blinding mask, and then will perform a tapping test. Intervention: Wrist anesthesia Intervention: Blinding mask Intervention: Tapping test
Wrist anesthesia, helmet
EXPERIMENTALSubjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia, will wear an anti-noise helmet, and then will perform a tapping test. Intervention: Wrist anesthesia Intervention: Anti-noise helmet Intervention: Tapping test
Wrist anesthesia, masked & helmet
EXPERIMENTALSubjects randomized to this group will have an axillary block / regional anesthesia, will wear a blinding mask, will wear an anti-noise helmet, and then will perform a tapping test. Intervention: Wrist anesthesia Intervention: Blinding mask Intervention: Anti-noise helmet Intervention: Tapping test
Interventions
Prior to the tapping test, regional anesthesia is performed in the form of sensory blocks distal to the wrist: injection of ropivacaine 7.5mg / ml is carried out successively in contact with three nerves (ulnar, median and radial) with a volume of 2 ml for nerve, for a total of 45mg.
Patients will don a mask that prevents them from seeing during the tapping test.
Patients will don a helmet that prevents them from hearing during the tapping test.
Subjects will be placed at a table in a sitting position where they will perform a rhythmic finger tapping test. The seat height is adjusted so that the front dominant arm rests comfortably on the table. Subjects will be equipped with headphones to receive auditory signals during a first synchronized phase of tapping. After the last auditory signal, participants will continue the tapping task by themselves as directed: "after the metronome stops,continue tapping the prescribed tempo as accurately and consistently as possible throughout the test." The movements of the index finger will be measured by a single-axis accelerometer (15 × 15 mm) attached to the nail.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The subject does not practice music intensively (\<1h / day on average)
You may not qualify if:
- The patient is participating in another study
- The patient is under judicial protection, or under guardianship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
- The subject regularly practices music
- The subject is suffering from a neurodegenerative disease of the central or peripheral nervous system which may affect the sensorimotor control of rhythmic movements of the upper limb
- The subject has had a recent trauma of the upper limb
- The subject is suffering from uncorrected visual and hearing impairment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Laboratoire Movement to Health (M2H), Euromov, Université Montpellier 1
Montpellier, 34090, France
CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Lapeyronie
Montpellier, 34295, France
CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, 30029, France
Related Publications (1)
Torre K, Vergotte G, Viel E, Perrey S, Dupeyron A. Fractal properties in sensorimotor variability unveil internal adaptations of the organism before symptomatic functional decline. Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 31;9(1):15736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52091-y.
PMID: 31673034RESULT
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kjerstin Torre, MD, PhD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2015
First Posted
November 20, 2015
Study Start
June 6, 2017
Primary Completion
August 31, 2017
Study Completion
August 31, 2017
Last Updated
November 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2018-01