THE INFLUENCE OF GRAVITY
ARGuide
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although most ground studies showed that an egocentric reference frame better supports spatial orientation, it is not proven it will be the same during weightlessness. Although it might justify that visuomotor performance will be better supported by egocentric target cueing under altered gravity conditions, the fact that exocentric target cueing induces less head movements and called for least attentional and physiological workload could be the key factors for a more efficient task localization process. Moreover, weightlessness can induce spatial disorientation, which can be additionally influenced by the intrinsic and extrinsic spatial reference frames (Gurfinkel et al., 1993; Glasauer \& Mittelstädt, 1997, 1998; Harm et al., 1998; Lipshits et al. 2005). We expect that during weightlessness the workload will be the key factor and thus we hypothesize that an exocentric target cueing will outperform egocentric target cueing. To test this hypothesis, and find out which presentation scheme for target cueing (EGO, EXO, ED) contributes most to an efficient visual search, performance to a visuomotor task will be evaluated during parabolic flights in normogravity (1g), hypergravity (1.8g) and microgravity (0g). The visuomotor performance will be assessed by a multi-directional tapping task as defined by ISO9241-9, which requests for motor responses by aimed pointing movements. Besides analyzing the pointing performance, different workload indices will be additionally assessed to evaluate the effort spent on visuomotor coordination. The attentional workload will be evaluated by the performance of a secondary task (visual reaction-time task), which needs to be conducted in parallel to the visuomotor task. Furthermore, the workload will be also assessed subjectively by the NASA TLX rating scale and physiologically, by analyzing the heart rate variability (HRV).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers
Started Oct 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable healthy-volunteers
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 2, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedOctober 2, 2017
September 1, 2017
3.1 years
September 27, 2017
September 27, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
visuomotor performance
The visuomotor performance will be assessed by a multi-directional tapping task as defined by ISO9241-9, which requests for motor responses by aimed pointing movements.
baseline
common external display guidance method (ED)
common external display guidance method (ED) and exocentric "in-view" cueing (EXO), using common guidance method with an external display (ED) as a control condition
baseline
Study Arms (1)
parabolic flights
EXPERIMENTALparabolic flights in normogravity (1g), hypergravity (1.8g) and microgravity (0g).
Interventions
healthy volunteers will experience 3 levels of gravity (1G, 1.8G, 0G).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy volunteers (men or women)
- Aged from 18 to 67
- Affiliated to a Social Security system and, for non-French resident, holding a European Health Insurance Card (EHIC)
- Who accepted to take part in the study
- Who have given their written stated consent
- Who has passed a medical examination similar to a standard aviation medical examination for private pilot aptitude (JAR FCL3 Class 2 medical examination). There will be no additional test performed for subject selection.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de Caen
Caen, France
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2017
First Posted
October 2, 2017
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
October 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share