NCT02509637

Brief Summary

Bronchiectasis is characterized pathologically by the abnormal and permanent dilation of bronchi caused mainly by the perpetuation of inflammation and impaired clearance of secretions. Physical therapy is essential in the treatment of these patients, using its various techniques and devices. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impedance of the respiratory system, by impulse oscillometry, after breathing exercises with chest compression or flutter in patients with bronchiectasis, considering that there are no results in the literature on the effect of these techniques in the small airways of these patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2015

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 3, 2015

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 28, 2015

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2015

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

February 23, 2017

Status Verified

February 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

July 3, 2015

Last Update Submit

February 21, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Respiratory SystemPhysical Therapy Modalities

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Respiratory System Impedance

    Will be evaluated the resistance (R), reactance (X), reactance area (AX) and resonance frequency (Fres) before, immediately after the intervention and after 30 minutes of rest in order of identifying changes in the components of resistance of airways of individuals.

    In the primary evaluation, and after seven and fourteen days.

  • Difficulty sputum

    Patients inform the ease or difficulty in expectoration in accordance with a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = no difficulty and 5 = extremely difficult. (Burioka, 1998). The scale will be applied at baseline and always after the intervention to assess whether there is difference in the difficulty of sputum between sessions.

    In the primary evaluation, and after seven and fourteen days.

  • Secretions weight

    The secretions are collected in the universal and heavy collectors on a precision balance.They will be evaluated in the total weight measurements and a dry weight and wet mucus. The weight of mucus of each interventions are compared to determine a technique with improved efficiency for removal of secretions.

    In the primary evaluation, and after seven and fourteen days.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Pulse oximetry

    In the primary evaluation, and after seven and fourteen days.

  • Acceptability and tolerance

    In the primary evaluation, and after seven and fourteen days.

  • Dyspnea scale:

    In the primary evaluation, and after seven and fourteen days.

  • Adhesiveness of expectorated secretion:

    In the primary evaluation, and after seven and fourteen days.

Study Arms (3)

Flutter Intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After initial evaluation, the subjects will perform breathing exercises with quiet inspiration and prolonged expiration on the device for thirty minutes, with breaks of one minute every four minutes. Immediately after the exercise will be performed new assessment against Impulse Oscillometry. Then patients will be kept for 30 minutes at rest and at the end will be applied the acceptability and tolerance scale and a third evaluation with Impulse Oscillometry. The secretions expectorated during the protocol will be evaluated for weight, adhesiveness and purulence.

Device: FlutterOther: Impulse OscillometricOther: Dyspnea scaleOther: Acceptability and toleranceDevice: Pulse oximetryOther: Difficulty sputum

Chest Compression Intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After initial evaluation, the subjects will be instructed to perform deep breaths between three quiet inspiration brought, and expiration will be accompanied by bilateral compression with the therapist's hands on the lower ribs during thirty minutes with one minute intervals of rest every four minutes. Immediately after the exercise will be performed new assessment against Impulse Oscillometry. Then patients will be kept for 30 minutes at rest and at the end will be applied the acceptability and tolerance scale and a third evaluation with Impulse Oscillometry. The secretions expectorated during the protocol will be evaluated for weight, adhesiveness and purulence.

Other: Chest CompressionOther: Impulse OscillometricOther: Dyspnea scaleOther: Acceptability and toleranceDevice: Pulse oximetryOther: Difficulty sputum

Crontrol Intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

After initial evaluation, patients will be remain seated quiet breathing without any guidance for thirty minutes. Immediately after this time will be held reassessment with Impulse Oscillometry. Then patients will be kept for 30 minutes at rest and at the end will be applied to acceptance and tolerance scale and a third evaluation with Impulse Oscillometry. The secretions expectorated during the protocol will be evaluated for wight, adhesiveness and purulence.

Other: ControlOther: Impulse OscillometricOther: Dyspnea scaleOther: Acceptability and toleranceDevice: Pulse oximetryOther: Difficulty sputum

Interventions

FlutterDEVICE

Flutter is a small device, simple, like a plastic pipe with a mouthpiece at one end and a perforated cover on the other, containing a steel ball resting in a plastic cone inside. When the patient exhales through the flutter expiratory flow causes movement of the ball, creating an oscillatory positive pressure.

Flutter Intervention

Manual chest compression is based on the application of forces resulting from the action of respiratory muscles or physiotherapist manual action in order to increase the alveolar pressure creating a pressure gradient to promote change in pulmonary flow and volume.It consists of vigorous compression of the chest at the beginning of expiration or during expiration.

Chest Compression Intervention
ControlOTHER
Crontrol Intervention

For this measure will be used IOS Jaeger (Jaeger, Wurzburg, Germany). to minimize the effect of the bad positioning of the tongue will use a mouth "free-flow", which contains a depressant for keeping the tongue in the mouth soil, stabilizing it and reducing oral resistance. Volunteers will support hands firmly on the cheeks to reduce the effect of oscillation thereof. The measures will be carried out with the volunteer sitting, using nasal, relaxed and your head in neutral clip, breathing normally through the mouthpiece to his lips tightly sealed to prevent air leaks.

Chest Compression InterventionCrontrol InterventionFlutter Intervention

Dyspnea will be evaluated across the range Medical Research Council (MRC) for use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Brazil.

Chest Compression InterventionCrontrol InterventionFlutter Intervention

patients will complete scales 1-7, 1: extremely and 7: none) on usefulness, ease to understand the instructions, easy to perform the exercises, degree of fatigue and discomfort

Chest Compression InterventionCrontrol InterventionFlutter Intervention

During therapy the patient will remain monitored with digital oximeter and the information will be recorded before and after the procedures

Chest Compression InterventionCrontrol InterventionFlutter Intervention

Patients inform the ease or difficulty sputum according to a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = no difficulty and 5 = extremely difficult.

Chest Compression InterventionCrontrol InterventionFlutter Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age30 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • aged between 30 and 80 years
  • diagnosed with bronchiectasis not resulting from cystic fibrosis, defined by history and full clinical examination and confirmed by computed tomography.

You may not qualify if:

  • Chest pain
  • acute hemoptysis
  • recent history rib fracture and pneumothorax
  • respiratory infection in the last 4 weeks prior to study
  • cystic fibrosis
  • asthma
  • fistula.
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ribeirão Preto Medicine School, University of São Paulo

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Tambascio J, de Souza LT, Lisboa RM, Passarelli Rde C, de Souza HC, Gastaldi AC. The influence of Flutter(R)VRP1 components on mucus transport of patients with bronchiectasis. Respir Med. 2011 Sep;105(9):1316-21. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.04.017.

    PMID: 21641196BACKGROUND
  • Oostveen E, MacLeod D, Lorino H, Farre R, Hantos Z, Desager K, Marchal F; ERS Task Force on Respiratory Impedance Measurements. The forced oscillation technique in clinical practice: methodology, recommendations and future developments. Eur Respir J. 2003 Dec;22(6):1026-41. doi: 10.1183/09031936.03.00089403.

    PMID: 14680096BACKGROUND
  • Murray MP, Pentland JL, Turnbull K, MacQuarrie S, Hill AT. Sputum colour: a useful clinical tool in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J. 2009 Aug;34(2):361-4. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00163208.

    PMID: 19648517BACKGROUND
  • McCarren B, Alison JA, Herbert RD. Manual vibration increases expiratory flow rate via increased intrapleural pressure in healthy adults: an experimental study. Aust J Physiother. 2006;52(4):267-71. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(06)70006-x.

    PMID: 17132121BACKGROUND
  • Eaton T, Young P, Zeng I, Kolbe J. A randomized evaluation of the acute efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of flutter and active cycle of breathing with and without postural drainage in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Chron Respir Dis. 2007;4(1):23-30. doi: 10.1177/1479972306074481.

  • de Souza Simoni LH, Dos Santos DO, de Souza HCD, Baddini-Martinez JA, Santos MK, Gastaldi AC. Acute Effects of Oscillatory PEP and Thoracic Compression on Secretion Removal and Impedance of the Respiratory System in Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis. Respir Care. 2019 Jul;64(7):818-827. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06025. Epub 2019 May 28.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bronchiectasis

Interventions

Chest Wall OscillationDrug ToleranceOximetry

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory TherapyTherapeuticsPharmacological PhenomenaPharmacological and Toxicological PhenomenaPhysiological PhenomenaBlood Gas AnalysisBlood Chemical AnalysisClinical Chemistry TestsClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisHeart Function TestsDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularRespiratory Function TestsDiagnostic Techniques, Respiratory SystemInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Ada C Gastaldi, PhD

    Ribeirão Preto Medicine School - University of São Paulo

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2015

First Posted

July 28, 2015

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion

September 1, 2016

Study Completion

September 1, 2016

Last Updated

February 23, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-02

Locations