Person-Centered Versus Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health
PCORI-SDM
Amplifying the Patient's Voice: Person-Centered Versus Measurement-Based Approaches in Mental Health
1 other identifier
interventional
2,443
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Fifteen minutes is the typical length of an outpatient medication management appointment for people with serious mental health conditions. These brief interactions with prescribers are frequently provider-driven with insufficient time focused on the patient's needs and personal recovery. Shared decision making is a strategy that could improve this interaction. This study examines how technology can be used in the care process to amplify the voice of the patient, support shared decisions, and improve treatment outcomes. Investigators will compare the effectiveness of Measurement-Based vs. Person-Centered Care on two primary patient-centered outcomes: the patient experience of care with medication treatment and the level of shared decision making. Investigators hypothesize that:
- 1.Person-Centered Care will result in greater improvement in patient experience of care with medication treatment than Measurement-Based Care.
- 2.Person-Centered Care will result in a greater level of shared decision making during the medication visit than Measurement-Based Care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable schizophrenia
Started Aug 2014
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 1, 2019
CompletedFebruary 26, 2019
February 1, 2019
2.3 years
June 30, 2015
January 11, 2018
February 6, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Patient Experience of Medication Treatment (PEMM)
The PEMM is a 12-item self-report measure of mental health patient experience of medication management with prescribers .Response options for 11 questions range from 0=Never to 4=Always, and the response options for the final question range from 0=Very Dissatisfied to 4=Very Satisfied. Overall possible range was 0 to 4. PEMM scores for each time point reflect the mean score of all measures collected within that time frame.
Baseline and every eight months during the two-year intervention phase
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
The SDM-Q-9 is a 9-item self-report measure of the degree of shared decision making in clinical encounters. There are 6 possible responses ranging from: Completely Disagree (0) to Completely Agree (5). Raw score ranges from 0 to 45. Multiplication of the raw score by 20/9 provides a score forced (transformed) to range from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates the lowest possible level of SDM and 100 indicates the highest extent of shared decision making in clinical encounters. SDM-Q-9 scores for each time point reflect the mean score of all measures collected within that time frame.
Baseline and every eight months during the two-year intervention phase
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Hope
Baseline and every eight months during the two-year intervention phase
Medication Side Effects
Baseline and every eight months during the two-year intervention phase
Patient Activation Measure (PAM)
Baseline and every eight months during the two-year intervention phase
Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-24)
Baseline and every eight months during the two-year intervention phase
Sheehan Disability Scale
Baseline and every eight months during the two-year intervention phase
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Person-Centered Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORDecision support center staffed by peers. Patient uses the CommonGround program prior to medication visit to prepare a personal report, with support from peer(s). The CommonGround report expresses goals for medication, how other strategies help with functioning, current problems, and medication side effects. Patient brings report into the medication visit. Prescriber and patient discuss medication options, and prescriber enters the shared decision into CommonGround during the visit.
Measurement-Based Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORClinic staff asks each patient to use a tablet computer to complete a brief assessment of symptoms and problems prior to medication visit. Prescriber views assessment results on office computer and discusses next steps in medication management with the patient.
Interventions
Decision support center staffed by peers. Patient uses the CommonGround program prior to medication visit to prepare a personal report, with support from peer(s). The CommonGround report expresses goals for medication, how other strategies help with functioning, current problems, and medication side effects. Patient brings report into the medication visit. Prescriber and patient discuss medication options, and prescriber enters the shared decision into CommonGround during the visit.
Clinic staff asks each patient to use a tablet computer to complete a brief assessment of symptoms and problems prior to medication visit. Prescriber views assessment results on office computer and discusses next steps in medication management with the patient.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults age 18 and older
- Non-SMI (anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, dysthymia, depression NOS) or SMI (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression)
- Receiving services at one of the 15 participating community mental health centers
- At least three claims for medication management services in past 12 months
- Insured by Community Care Behavioral Health Organization
You may not qualify if:
- Assessed by clinicians as being too ill to be treated on an outpatient basis
- Unable to speak, read, or understand English at the minimum required level
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Pittsburghlead
- Dartmouth Collegecollaborator
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03766, United States
UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15219, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The PEMM was developed for this study. For unavoidable reasons, site randomization was not maintained. Data collection timepoints were expanded.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kelly Williams, Program Administrator
- Organization
- UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gregory J McHugo, PhD
Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kim MacDonald-Wilson, ScD,CRC,CPRP
UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patricia E Deegan, PhD
Pat Deegan, PhD & Associates, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2015
First Posted
July 23, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 31, 2016
Study Completion
March 31, 2017
Last Updated
February 26, 2019
Results First Posted
February 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02