Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope
1 other identifier
interventional
117
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The safety and efficacy of a video-laryngoscope as a primary intubation tool in urgent endotracheal intubation of critically-ill patients has not been well-described in the literature. This study will answer whether using a VL will impact on the efficacy and safety of intubation compared with a traditional direct laryngoscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 25, 2014
CompletedOctober 20, 2014
October 1, 2014
8 months
September 6, 2012
May 23, 2014
October 9, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
First Pass Success Rate
From begining of intubation to verification. Less then 5 minutes approximatly
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Severe Desaturation
For 10 minutes post intubation
Hypotension
For 10 minutes post intubation
Cardiac Arrest
For 1 hour post intubation
Complications of Intubation
For 10 minutes post intubation
Study Arms (2)
Direct laryngoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntubation will be done using direct laryngoscopy
Video laryngoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntubation will be done using video laryngoscopy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients undergoing urgent endotracheal intubation by a pulmonary critical care medicine physician
You may not qualify if:
- Difficult airway
- Oxygen saturation \< 92% despite adequate mask ventilation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beth Isreal Medical Center
New York, New York, 10003, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michael Silverberg
- Organization
- Beth Israel Medical center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Silverberg, MD
Beth Israel Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2012
First Posted
September 12, 2012
Study Start
August 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 1, 2013
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 20, 2014
Results First Posted
June 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10