Method Evaluation Study of Truview Picture Capture Device(PCD) Versus MacIntosh Laryngoscope
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: The aim of the method evaluation study is a comparing study of Truview PCD™ (Picture Capture Device) laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope. The result of this study will form a basis for a possible recommendation of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope in our organisation. The laryngoscopes are compared according to their ability to visualize the glottis area measured by the Cormack Lehane (CL) grade and the time used to get the best CL grade. A registration of any damage of tissue/teeths caused by the laryngoscopes, and a possible decrease of the saturation will also be made. Hypothesis: The Truview PCD™ laryngoscope provides a better view of the vocal cords and thereby makes the intubation les difficult. CL 1 is achieved in 90 percent of intubations with the Macintosh laryngoscope, and the hypothesis of the study is that CL 1 can be increased to 98 percent by use of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 9, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedJune 19, 2012
June 1, 2012
4 months
January 24, 2012
June 18, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cormack Lehane (CL) grade
At the first laryngoscopy the patient is sprayed between plica vocalis with Lidocaine 4%, then the patient is ventilated by a mask. During the next laryngoscopy the intubation is performed (the endotracheal tube is placed in trachea). The patients are randomized by lottery as to which laryngoscope to be used first. After anesthesia induction, preceded by 3 minutes of preoxygenering, the first laryngoscope is used when spraying the patient with Lidocaine. Subsequently the patient is ventilated for 2 minutes, and then the intubation is performed by using the other laryngoscope.
The seconds during intubation where the anaesthesiologist view the vocal cords to determine the CL grade..
Interventions
The aim of the method evaluation study is a comparing study of Truview PCD™ laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope. The result of this study will form a basis for a possible recommendation of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope in our organisation. The laryngoscopes are compared according to their ability to visualize the glottis area measured by the Cormack Lehane (CL) grade and the time used to get the best CL grade. (See figure 1.) A registration of any damage of tissue/teeths caused by the laryngoscopes, and a possible decrease of the saturation will also be made.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 18 years of age who are to undergo a surgery at the ENT department, Aalborg Hospital.
- Patients who understand and accept the trial information.
- SARI score 2-5.
You may not qualify if:
- SARI score 0-1 and \> 5.
- A need for acute initiation. (By acute initiation the endotracheal tube will be placed in trachea during the first laryngoscopy without prior spraying with local anesthesia).
- If unexpected difficulties during the initiating anesthesia arise, the trial will be interrupted, and the patient will be treated according to the department's guidelines for the situation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Per Henrik Lambert
Aalborg, Ålborg, 9000, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2012
First Posted
February 9, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 19, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06