The EarLens Contact Hearing Device (CHD) Spectrum Study
Spectrum
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
8
Brief Summary
The EarLens System is an assistive hearing device that is intended to provide amplification for the treatment of patients with sensorineural hearing impairment. The purpose of the proposed study (Extended Investigation under the Continued Access Policy) is to continue to allow access to the investigational medical device with the collection of device utility and clinic process-flow data while the marketing application is under review at the FDA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 8, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 27, 2017
CompletedJune 27, 2017
May 1, 2017
1 year
June 8, 2015
February 10, 2017
May 25, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Hearing Stability Using Unaided Air Conduction Thresholds.
Hearing sensitivity was monitored using earphones with the TMT (Tympanic Membrane Transducer) in place, but with the audio processor removed. Baseline and study end measurements were compared. A PTA4 (Pure Tone Average at 4 frequencies; 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) was computed both for baseline unaided hearing post-placement with TMT in place, and unaided hearing with TMT in place at the 90-day for each ear, then averaged across both ears for each subject. A determination of "No Hearing Change" for the subject was made if the calculated hearing changes of the subject population are 10dB or less.
Baseline and up to 90-day.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Speech Understanding in Noise.
Baseline and up to 90-day.
Change in Functional Gain Over the Frequency Range From 2000 to 10,000 Hz.
Baseline and up to 90-day.
Change in Subject's Self-Perceived Ability to Communicate.
Baseline and up to 90-day.
Other Outcomes (1)
Adverse Events
Baseline and up to 90-day.
Study Arms (1)
Sound amplificatoin via EarLens CHD
EXPERIMENTALSound amplification provided via the EarLens CHD for subjects with hearing impairment.
Interventions
Subjects with mild to severe hearing impairment receiving sound amplification treatment with EarLens CHD.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 85 years.
- Mild to severe hearing impairment between 125 to 8000 Hz.
- Asymptomatic of retro-cochlear lesions or cleared of retro-cochlear lesion by MRI.
- No significant conductive hearing impairment;
- No more than a 10 dB air-bone gap at 3 of 4 tested frequencies (500, 1000, 2000, or 4000 Hz)
- Normal Type A tympanometry (indicating normal mobility of the tympanic membrane and middle ear bones)
- Greater than or equal to 50% on clinical speech discrimination demonstrating an ability to benefit from amplification;
- Able and willing to commit to the travel and time demands of the study (available for 5 months or longer) and able to comprehend and comply with the study materials and instructions
- Experience with 1 or 2 air conduction hearing aids or previously evaluated for use with hearing aids;
- Fluent speaker of American English due to use of American English study materials
You may not qualify if:
- The Subject must not have known or active medical issues that would preclude having a hearing device, including:
- an abnormal TM (deemed perforated, inflamed or has a dimeric or monomeric area, or in any other way abnormal);
- an abnormal middle ear or a history of prior middle ear surgery other than tympanostomy tubes;
- an ear canal anatomy that prevents the physician from seeing an adequate amount of the tympanic membrane.
- an anatomical configuration of the external auditory canal that prevents satisfactory placement of the TMT
- a history of chronic and recurrent ear infections in the past 24 months;
- a rapidly progressive or fluctuating hearing impairment;
- diagnosed with having a compromised immune system which may impact the tissue of the auricle or ear canal, such as keratosis obturans, ichthyosis, eczema of the auricle or ear canal, or received radiation of the head ever or chemotherapy for cancer within the last six years.
- Must not fit the definition of a vulnerable subject, as per FDA regulations 21 CFR Parts 50 and 56
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
California Hearing and Balance Center
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
Rodney Perkins Associates
Menlo Park, California, 94025, United States
Camino Ear Nose and Throat Clinic
San Jose, California, 95138, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
CNC Hearing and Balance Center
Marrero, Louisiana, 70072, United States
Carolina Ear and Hearing Clinic
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609, United States
Pittsburgh Ear Associates
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212, United States
Ear Medical Group
San Antonio, Texas, 78240, United States
Related Publications (1)
Arbogast TL, Moore BCJ, Puria S, Dundas D, Brimacombe J, Edwards B, Carr Levy S. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2. Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):741-756. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000661.
PMID: 30300158DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Suzanne Levy, Director of Clinical Research
- Organization
- Earlens Corporation
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Brent Edwards
EarLens, Corp.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 8, 2015
First Posted
June 12, 2015
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
June 27, 2017
Results First Posted
June 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share