Fitting Strategy Study
Web App Fitting Strategy Validation NSR Device Study
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To be conducted with adult participants with mild-to-moderate hearing loss to validate the effectiveness of the Web App fitting strategy. Validation measures participant's perceived hearing aid benefit when using the Web App fitted hearing aids and when using standard-of-care fitted hearing aids.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 26, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 12, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 12, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 30, 2025
CompletedSeptember 30, 2025
September 1, 2025
4 months
July 12, 2021
May 12, 2025
September 9, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)
The APHAB consists of 24 questions across 4 subscales: Ease of Communication (EC), Background Noise (BN), Reverberation (RV), and Aversiveness (AV), assessing hearing difficulties in daily situations reported as percentage of problems (0-100%, 100% = highest number of problems). It evaluates hearing aid (HA) benefit by subtracting the reported % of problems with HA from without HA, yielding scores from 0 (no benefit) to 100 (maximum benefit) in each subscale. The study focuses on the communication subscales (EC, BN, RV) and calculates benefit score differences for each subscale after using A) Web-App-fitted and B) standard-of-care-fitted HAs. The difference-of-benefit scores are compared to non-inferiority margins from Cox\&Alexander (Ear\&Hearing 1995). Differences-in-benefit scores range from -100 to 100, with negative scores indicating greater benefit with Web-App-fitted HAs, 0 indicating identical benefit and higher scores indicating greater benefit with standard-of-care fitting.
14-17 Days hearing aid wearing time per fitting type
Study Arms (2)
Web-App-fitted Hearing Aid, Then Standard-of-care fitted Hearing Aid
EXPERIMENTALPatients self-fitted the web-app-fitted hearing aids and wore them in a home-trial for 14 days. After a washout period of 5 days, they were fitted by a hearing care professional with the Standard-of-care fitted hearing aids and wore those in a home-trial for 14 days.
Standard-of-care-fitted Hearing Aid, Then Web-App-fitted hearing Aid
EXPERIMENTALPatients were fitted by a hearing care professional with the Standard-of-care fitted hearing aids and wore them in a home-trial for 14 days. After a washout period of 5 days, they self-fitted the web-app-fitted hearing aids and wore those in a home-trial for 14 days.
Interventions
Web App Strategy fitting of hearing aids
Standard-of-care fitting of hearing aids
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults 18 years of age or older,
- Self-perceived mild to moderate hearing impairment,
- Signed informed consent form (ICF),
- Fluent in English listening and reading comprehension,
- With or without prior experience with hearing aids. At least four subjects and maximum 30% of the total number of subjects enrolled in this study will have prior hearing aid experience.
- Measured audiogram with at least four of the test frequencies 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, 3000 Hz, and 4000 Hz within fitting range of Web App fitted hearing aid
You may not qualify if:
- Hearing aids do not fit into the person's ears with any of the offered silicone 'Click Sleeves' instant ear tips.
- Abnormal conditions:
- Severe hearing loss or deafness in at least one ear.
- A steep decline in hearing ability within the last 90 days in one or both ears.
- Active discharge within the last 90 days.
- Dizziness.
- A visible deformity of the ear.
- Pain, or discomfort in the ear, or significant ear wax accumulation.
- Audiometric air-bone gap equal to or greater than 15 decibels at 500 hertz Hz, 1,000 Hz, and 2,000 Hz.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- WSAUD A/Slead
- University of South Dakotacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of South Dakota, USD Speech and Hearing Clinic
Vermillion, South Dakota, 57069, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Veronika Littmann
- Organization
- WSAUDAS
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lindsey Jorgensen
University of South Dakota
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- The masking only done at the final visit.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2021
First Posted
July 22, 2021
Study Start
July 26, 2021
Primary Completion
November 12, 2021
Study Completion
November 12, 2021
Last Updated
September 30, 2025
Results First Posted
September 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share