Clinical Evaluation of the Cochlear Nucleus CI532 Cochlear Implant in Adults
SME
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
10
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to gather long-term data on the FDA approved CI532 cochlear implant, and CP1000 (Nucleus 7) sound processor
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 2, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 6, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 3, 2020
CompletedDecember 30, 2020
December 1, 2020
1.8 years
December 27, 2016
November 9, 2020
December 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Pre- to 6 Months Post-implantation Speech Recognition in Quiet in the Implanted Ear Alone
Group mean Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) word recognition in quiet measured pre-operatively and again at 6 month post sound processor activation compared to the group mean score in the preoperative, best unilateral condition. The CNC word test has a score range of 0-100% with higher values indicating better scores.
Preoperatively and 6 months post sound processor activation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of Change in Pre and Post Implantation Speech Recognition in Noise Scores in the Implanted Ear Alone
Preoperatively and 6 months post sound processor activation
Change in Pre and Post Implantation Score on the Health Utility Index-3 (HUI3)
Preoperatively and 6 months post sound processor activaton
Other Outcomes (2)
Frequency Specific Thresholds and Speech Recognition in Noise or Quiet
12 months post-activation
Speech Perception in Quiet and Noise With Change in Cochlear Implant Programming
Following 12-month study visit but prior to 36-month interval.
Study Arms (1)
CI532/N7 study group
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects will receive a CI532 cochlear implant (intervention) and be fit with the CP1000 sound processor
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults 18 years or older who have a bilateral postlinguistic sensorineural hearing loss.
- Limited benefit from amplification as defined by test scores of 40% correct or less in the ear to be implanted and 50% or less in the contralateral ear on a recorded monosyllabic word test I. Consistent with the Minimum Speech Test Battery (2011), it is required that all subjects be evaluated at 60 dBA presentation level.
- Bilateral moderate sloping to profound hearing loss
- Minimum of 30 days experience with appropriately fit bilateral amplification, fit using the standardized National Acoustics Laboratory (NAL) fitting method
- Proficient in English
- Ability to complete testing -
You may not qualify if:
- Previous cochlear implantation
- Pre-linguistically deafened (onset of hearing loss at less than two years of age)
- Ossification or any other cochlear anomaly that might prevent complete insertion of the electrode array
- Duration of severe to profound hearing loss greater than 20 years
- Diagnosis of retro-cochlear pathology
- Diagnosis of auditory neuropathy
- Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations that are inherent to the surgical procedure and use of the prosthetic device
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with all investigational requirements
- Additional cognitive, medical or social handicaps that would prevent completion of all study requirements-
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cochlearlead
Study Sites (10)
Rocky Mountain Ear Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80113, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48108, United States
The Center for Hearing and Balance Disorders
Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017, United States
Midwest Ear Institute
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
New York University
New York, New York, 10016, United States
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 13212, United States
Hearts for Hearing
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120, United States
Dallas Ear Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75230, United States
Related Publications (9)
Grutters JP, Joore MA, van der Horst F, Verschuure H, Dreschler WA, Anteunis LJ. Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints. Qual Life Res. 2007 Oct;16(8):1439-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9237-x. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
PMID: 17647093BACKGROUNDHiller W, Goebel G. Factors influencing tinnitus loudness and annoyance. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Dec;132(12):1323-30. doi: 10.1001/archotol.132.12.1323.
PMID: 17178943BACKGROUNDMeinert,C(1986).ClinicalTrials:Design,Conduct,andAnalysis.OxfordUniversityPress,NewYork.
BACKGROUNDNasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
PMID: 15817019BACKGROUNDPETERSON GE, LEHISTE I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord. 1962 Feb;27:62-70. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62. No abstract available.
PMID: 14485785BACKGROUNDSpahr AJ, Dorman MF, Litvak LM, Van Wie S, Gifford RH, Loizou PC, Loiselle LM, Oakes T, Cook S. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):112-7. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822c2549.
PMID: 21829134BACKGROUNDKelsall D, Lupo J, Biever A. Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan-Feb;42(1):102773. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102773. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
PMID: 33161258DERIVEDWick CC, Kallogjeri D, McJunkin JL, Durakovic N, Holden LK, Herzog JA, Firszt JB, Buchman CA; CI532 Study Group. Hearing and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users 65 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct 1;146(10):925-932. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1585.
PMID: 32857114DERIVEDBuchman CA, Herzog JA, McJunkin JL, Wick CC, Durakovic N, Firszt JB, Kallogjeri D; CI532 Study Group. Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Oct 1;146(10):916-924. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1584.
PMID: 32857113DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Cochlear Clinical Studies
- Organization
- Cochlear
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jillian Crosson, PhD
Senior Manager of Clinical Services
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Megan Mears, AuD
Clinical Project Manager
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2016
First Posted
January 2, 2017
Study Start
February 15, 2017
Primary Completion
December 3, 2018
Study Completion
March 6, 2020
Last Updated
December 30, 2020
Results First Posted
December 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-12