Spectral Dynamics and Speech Understanding by Hearing Impaired People
2 other identifiers
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this program of research is to understand the perception of the dynamic spectral properties of speech by hearing-impaired listeners, with the long-term goal of improving speech understanding by these individuals in adverse listening conditions. The proposed research compares the performance of normally-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners on measures of speech understanding in the presence of different types of signal distortion and speech understanding of signals with enhanced spectral dynamics. A computational model based on the amount of potential information available in speech will be used to quantify differences in speech intelligibility due to hearing status and stimulus characteristics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 20, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 26, 2018
CompletedApril 26, 2018
April 1, 2018
3.1 years
May 20, 2013
September 1, 2017
April 24, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Correct Words Identified
The experimental approach compares speech identification performance among younger, normally-hearing listeners, older normally-hearing listeners and hearing-impaired listeners. Tasks will be carried out in quiet and in the presence of continuous, speech-shaped background noise. The investigators compared the understanding of unprocessed stimuli with 1) time-compressed stimuli, 2) time-compressed stimuli expanded in time via gaps and 3) uncompressed stimuli where portions of the signal were replaced with silence. Experimental metrics were percentage of correct/incorrect speech identification in each listening condition.
average of two blocks per condition obtained over the course of up to three 2-hour visits, spaced an average of one week apart
Study Arms (3)
Younger normally-hearing listeners
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants with auditory thresholds within the normal limits. * age between 18 and 35 * individuals with hearing thresholds of 20 dB HL or better at all octave frequencies between 250 Hz and 4000 Hz Acoustic distortion of speech
Hearing-impaired listeners
ACTIVE COMPARATORindividuals with bilateral sensorineural hearing losses with thresholds between 25 and 70 dB HL and no losses greater than 70 dB HL at frequencies of 4000 Hz or below * age 18 to 65 Acoustic distortion of speech
Older normally-hearing listeners
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants with auditory thresholds within the normal limits. * age between 36 and 65 * individuals with hearing thresholds of 20 dB HL or better at all octave frequencies between 250 Hz and 4000 Hz Acoustic distortion of speech
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- individuals with hearing thresholds of 20 dB HL or better at all octave frequencies between 250 Hz and 4000 Hz
- or, individuals with bilateral sensorineural hearing losses with thresholds between 25 and 70 dB HL and no losses greater than 70 dB HL at frequencies of 4000 Hz or below
You may not qualify if:
- a conductive hearing impairment or other otological pathology
- hearing thresholds greater than 70 dB HL at any frequencies of 4000 Hz or below or pure-tone averages (averaged across 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz) of greater than 65 dB HL
- bilateral differences greater than 20 dB at any frequency below 4000 Hz
- an inability to complete the experimental tasks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Michelle R. Molis, PhD
- Organization
- VA Portland HCS, RR&D National Center for Auditory Rehabilitative Research
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelle R Molis, PhD
VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 20, 2013
First Posted
June 4, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 1, 2016
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 26, 2018
Results First Posted
April 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04