A Pilot Study of Individualized Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
2 other identifiers
interventional
77
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a pilot single arm study with the primary endpoints of feasibility and preliminary estimates of safety and efficacy. This protocol builds on over 25 years of experience with high dose liver RT (Radiation Therapy), and in particular adaptive RT aimed at adjusting the global radiation dose based on a patient's measured sensitivity to treatment. This current protocol uses functional imaging and specialized radiation planning techniques to spare highly functional portions of the liver to preserve function. The investigators feel this will further improve the safety and efficacy of RT for all patients by customizing treatments to each. If this approach is promising, the investigators will proceed to a phase II randomized study of standard versus spatially and dosimetrically adapted RT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 26, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 20, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 20, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 15, 2023
CompletedNovember 15, 2023
November 1, 2023
6 years
May 28, 2015
October 23, 2023
November 13, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The Proportion of Patients for Whom the Intended Treatment Was Feasible
The primary aim of the trial is feasibility which is defined as the ability to successfully deliver the full treatment including all adaptations and in particular the perfusion-based planning and replanning.
At end of treatment; up to ~3 months
Percentage of Patients With Change in Child Pugh Score >= 2
Rate of liver decompensation reported as the percentage of patients with a change in Child Pugh score of greater than or equal to 2 within 6 months of SBRT.
Baseline to approximately 6 months after initiation of SBRT
Median Time to Local Progression
The primary efficacy endpoint is local control, measured as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of progression of the treated (target) lesion(s). Patients with no evidence of local progression at the time of data analysis will be censored at the last date on which they were evaluated for local progression. Local progression will be summarized with Kaplan-Meier curves and reported with 95% confidence intervals.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Median Time to Progression
24 months
Change in ALBI Scores
Approximately 6 months
Incidence of Grade 3 Gastrointestinal (GI) Bleeding Toxicities
Approximately 6 months
Overall Survival
24 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Radiation Induced Liver Disease (RILD)
24 months
Study Arms (1)
Adaptive Radiation Therapy
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must have hepatocellular carcinoma.
- Patients must not have extrahepatic cancer.
- Patients must not be eligible for a curative liver resection or have refused resection
- Patients must have recovered from the acute effects of prior liver-directed therapy and 4 weeks must have passed since the last procedure and protocol therapy.
- Patients must have a Zubrod performance status of less than or equal to 2 (Zubrod performance status is a measure that attempts to quantify a cancer patients' general well-being. Scores run from 0 to 5 where 0 denotes normal activity and 5 denotes death).
- Patients must be 18 years of age or older.
- Patients must have adequate organ function.
- Patients must understand and be willing to sign an IRB (Institutional Review Board) approved informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with known allergies to intravenous iodinated contrast agents.
- Patients with a contraindication to contrast-enhanced MRI are excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rogel Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48187, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Theodore Lawrence
- Organization
- University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Theodore Lawrence, M.D., Ph.D.
Rogel Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 28, 2015
First Posted
June 2, 2015
Study Start
January 26, 2016
Primary Completion
January 20, 2022
Study Completion
January 20, 2022
Last Updated
November 15, 2023
Results First Posted
November 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11