Use of PillCam ESO2 in Triaging Patients Present With Upper GIB
The Use Of PillCam Esophagus In Triaging Patients Presented With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
1 other identifier
interventional
68
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background
- Patients presented to hospital with coffee ground vomiting and black stool may not be actually having upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB)
- Hospital admission can be avoided if serious UGIB can be excluded
- To date, the only useful tool to triage patient for hospital admission in UGIB is by using clinical score such as Rockall score or Blatchford score
- These scores are cumbersome and only exclude the most benign cases, but they are not useful in differentiating those who needs intervention
- In our pilot study, investigators found that capsule endoscopy can be used to identify patients with fresh blood and real coffee ground substance in the stomach and it is superior to nasogastric tube
- Most of UGI lesions leading to bleeding can be diagnosed by capsule endoscopy Objectives The current study is designed
- to validate capsule endoscopy is an effective method in identifying patients with UGIB
- to study whether the capsule endoscopy can reduce requirement of hospital admission in patients with suspected UGIB
- to study if capsule endoscopy can help to identify patients with UGIB that may require urgent (within 24 hours) endoscopy and intervention
- to study the cost-effectiveness of capsule endoscopy being used as a triaging tool in the management of UGIB
- to compare the effectiveness of capsule endoscopy against Blatchford score in identifying patients with UGIB that may require endoscopic intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 12, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedApril 25, 2017
April 1, 2017
1.4 years
May 12, 2015
April 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The number of patients requiring hospital admission
Patients with evidence of significant bleeding will be admitted to ward and receive early endoscopy (EGD)
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Clinical rebleeding
30 days
Mortality
30 days
Cost of management in different strategies
One year
Comparing the effectiveness of CE against Glasgow Blatchford score in identifying patients with UGIB that may require endoscopic intervention
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Capsule group: PillCam ESO2
ACTIVE COMPARATORPerform capsule endoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy will be preformed within 24 hours after capsule ingestion
Standard group
NO INTERVENTIONPerform standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individual aged ≥ 18 years presenting to the emergency department with acute, overt UGIB defined as coffee ground vomiting and/or melena
You may not qualify if:
- UGIB with hemodynamic shock (BP\<90mmHg and pulse\>120 per minutes) requiring urgent endoscopy,
- UGIB with fresh hematemesis requiring urgent endoscopy
- dysphagia, odynophagia, swallowing disorder, Zencker's diverticulum, suspected bowel obstruction or bowel perforation,
- prior bowel obstruction, gastroparesis or known gastric outlet obstruction, Crohn's disease, past GI tract surgery.
- presence of an electromedical device (pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator),
- altered mental status (e.g., hepatic encephalopathy) that would limit patient ability in swallowing the capsule, pregnancy and/or lactating, allergy to conscious sedation medications, allergy to Maxolon, unwillingness to swallow the capsule, patient expected to undergo Magnetic Resonance Imaging examination within 7 days of ingesting the capsule, patient on medications that may coat the upper GI tract such as antacids or sucralfate, or inability to provide written informed consent.
- Allergy to Maxolon
- Patients with known Esophageal Varices or Gastric Varices with or without prior bleeding episodes
- Known upper/ lower GI cancer (eg, cancer of esophagus, stomach, small bowel, colon) or hepatocellular carcinoma or pancreatic cancer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Sung JJ, Tang RS, Ching JY, Rainer TH, Lau JY. Use of capsule endoscopy in the emergency department as a triage of patients with GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Dec;84(6):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.04.043. Epub 2016 May 6.
PMID: 27156655DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jessica Y.L. Ching, MPH
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2015
First Posted
May 18, 2015
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 25, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share