OTSC vs. Angiographic Embolization in Patients With Refractory Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Endoscopic Application of Over-the-scope Clips (OTSC) vs. Angiographic Embolization in Patients With Refractory Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: a Multicenter Randomized Comparison
1 other identifier
interventional
236
3 countries
5
Brief Summary
In the management of patients with acute upper non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, further bleeding is the most important adverse factor predictive of mortality. In the United Kingdom Audit on acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, clinical evidence of further bleeding was reported in 13% of patients following the first endoscopy and 27% of them died. The use of OTSC has emerged as an alternative before angiographic embolization(TAE) which is often considered most definitive. We propose to define the algorithm in the management of patients with refractory bleeding from their peptic ulcers or other non variceal causes. We hypothesize that endoscopic use of OTSC compares favourably with TAE and both lead to similar outcomes. An equivalence of the two modalities may mean that endoscopic application of OTSC should be attempted before TAE as often we need to document further bleeds with endoscopy and a second treatment should be instituted at the same time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 27, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2026
March 18, 2026
March 1, 2026
4.5 years
May 14, 2021
March 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
further bleeding
Further bleeding is a composite of persistent or recurrent bleeding. Persistent bleeding is defined by active bleeding that cannot be stopped despite study intervention. For assessment of treatment efficacy, a repeat endoscopy can be performed to document further bleeding (fresh blood in the stomach and active bleeding or major stigmata of bleeding to the previously treated lesion).
within 30 days after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (6)
further interventions
within 30 days after randomization
blood transfusion
within 30 days after randomization
length of hospitalization
within 30 days after randomization
length of ICU stay
within 30 days after randomization
mortality related to bleeding
within 30 days after randomization
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Over-the-scope clips
EXPERIMENTALThe OTSC® System Set is an instrument for flexible endoscopy The OTSC® System Set consists of an applicator cap with a mounted OTSC® clip, thread, thread retriever and a hand wheel for clip release. The OTSC® clip is delivered by means of an applicator cap mounted to the tip of gastroscopes or colonoscopes. The clip is released by tightening the thread with the hand wheel. The OTSC® clip for flexible endoscopy is a superelastic Nitinol device for compression and approximation of tissue in the digestive tract
angiographic embolization
EXPERIMENTALThe procedure was performed in the angiographic suite and under local anaesthetics to the patient's groin. The celiac and then gastroduodenal artery or the left gastric artery was selectively cannulated depending on ulcer location. Coils were deposited distal to the bleeding point. Gel foam particles were then packed into the artery and its collaterals. This was followed by further coils deposited in its proximal portion until complete cessation of arterial flow. Our protocol requested empiric embolisation of the artery even in the absence of active contrast extravasation or a pseudoaneurysm.
Interventions
The endoscope was extracted and equipped with the OTSC system. OTSC system is deployed on the lesion with suction to target lesion
Transcatheter selective embolization to bleeding arteries
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Patients presented with overt signs of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (hematemesis, melena and/or hypotension) 2. documented bleeding lesion at endoscopy (ulcer, dieulafoy's lesion and others), further bleeds (persistent or recurrent) after endoscopic hemostasis (thermal or hemoclips) as defined by an International Consensus Group
You may not qualify if:
- without a full informed consent from the patient or his next of kin
- Age \<18 years
- Pregnant
- Lactating women
- patients with known allergy to intravenous contrast
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Beijing friendship Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
Huaxi Hospital of Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Endoscopy Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, N.T., Hong Kong
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand
Related Publications (7)
Barkun AN, Almadi M, Kuipers EJ, Laine L, Sung J, Tse F, Leontiadis GI, Abraham NS, Calvet X, Chan FKL, Douketis J, Enns R, Gralnek IM, Jairath V, Jensen D, Lau J, Lip GYH, Loffroy R, Maluf-Filho F, Meltzer AC, Reddy N, Saltzman JR, Marshall JK, Bardou M. Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):805-822. doi: 10.7326/M19-1795. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
PMID: 31634917RESULTGralnek IM, Dumonceau JM, Kuipers EJ, Lanas A, Sanders DS, Kurien M, Rotondano G, Hucl T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Marmo R, Racz I, Arezzo A, Hoffmann RT, Lesur G, de Franchis R, Aabakken L, Veitch A, Radaelli F, Salgueiro P, Cardoso R, Maia L, Zullo A, Cipolletta L, Hassan C. Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015 Oct;47(10):a1-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393172. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
PMID: 26417980RESULTKyaw M, Tse Y, Ang D, Ang TL, Lau J. Embolization versus surgery for peptic ulcer bleeding after failed endoscopic hemostasis: a meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2014 Mar;2(1):E6-E14. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365235. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
PMID: 26134614RESULTBeggs AD, Dilworth MP, Powell SL, Atherton H, Griffiths EA. A systematic review of transarterial embolization versus emergency surgery in treatment of major nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 16;7:93-104. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S56725. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24790465RESULTTarasconi A, Baiocchi GL, Pattonieri V, Perrone G, Abongwa HK, Molfino S, Portolani N, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, Heyer A, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Catena F. Transcatheter arterial embolization versus surgery for refractory non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis. World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Feb 1;14:3. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0223-8. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30733822RESULTSverden E, Mattsson F, Lindstrom D, Sonden A, Lu Y, Lagergren J. Transcatheter Arterial Embolization Compared With Surgery for Uncontrolled Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: A Population-based Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):304-309. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002565.
PMID: 29064894RESULTSchmidt A, Golder S, Goetz M, Meining A, Lau J, von Delius S, Escher M, Hoffmann A, Wiest R, Messmann H, Kratt T, Walter B, Bettinger D, Caca K. Over-the-Scope Clips Are More Effective Than Standard Endoscopic Therapy for Patients With Recurrent Bleeding of Peptic Ulcers. Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):674-686.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.037. Epub 2018 May 24.
PMID: 29803838RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yau Wong James Lau, MD
The Chinese University of HongKong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2021
First Posted
May 26, 2021
Study Start
November 27, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Last Updated
March 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share