NCT02017379

Brief Summary

This is a study comparing the effect of erythromycin or metoclopramide, 2 prokinetic drugs (Drugs which are known to speed up the emptying of the stomach or in other words to move the blood out of the stomach faster) given before endoscopy to patients with upper Gastrointestinal bleeding compared to patients who will not receive either of these medications before their endoscopy.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
4

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 20, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2014

Completed
6.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 4, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 4, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

December 16, 2013

Results QC Date

February 10, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 10, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

upper gastrointestinal bleedingmelenahematemesis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Erythromycin, Metoclopromide vs Control Enabling Visualization of the Entire Gastric Mucosa .

    Whether erythromycin, metoclopramide versus control can enable visualization of the entire gastric mucosa .

    45 minutes

  • Erythromycin, Metoclopromide vs Control Improving the Quality of Stomach and Duodenum Visualization

    Whether erythromycin, metoclopramide vs control can improve the quality of stomach and duodenum visualization: using the scoring system by Fossard et al

    45 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Source of Bleeding

    45 minutes

  • Second-look Endoscopy

    48 hours

  • Blood Units Transfused

    48 hours

  • Mortality

    30 days

Study Arms (3)

Erythromycin

EXPERIMENTAL

Intravenous erythromycin infusion (dose: 250 mg) 30 min-60 min before procedure

Drug: Erythromycin

Metoclopromide

EXPERIMENTAL

Intravenous metoclopromide infusion (dose: 10 mg) 30-60 minutes prior to endoscopy

Drug: Metoclopromide

Control

NO INTERVENTION

no medications will be given prior to endoscopy

Interventions

Also known as: Erythrocin, E-Mycin, Ery-Tab, Ilosone
Erythromycin
Also known as: Reglan, Maxolon, Metozolv ODT
Metoclopromide

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (18-80)
  • who are admitted to the ICU for hematemesis, or coffee ground emesis

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients younger than 18 yrs old or older than 80 yrs
  • Patients who refuse to consent to be in our study
  • Pregnant patients
  • Prior use of prokinetics in the last 48 hours
  • History of cardiac arrhythmia
  • Allergy to erythromycin or metoclopromide
  • Patients with QT prolongation (query 7)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Texas Tech University Health Science Center

El Paso, Texas, 79905, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal HemorrhageMelenaHematemesis

Interventions

ErythromycinErythromycin EstolateMetoclopramide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsVomitingSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MacrolidesPolyketidesLactonesOrganic ChemicalsBenzamidesAmidespara-AminobenzoatesAminobenzoatesBenzoatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsChlorobenzoatesHydroxybenzoate EthersHydroxybenzoatesHydroxy AcidsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsPhenyl EthersPhenols

Limitations and Caveats

The study was terminated and the PI has left the institution. Efforts were made to contact the PI/study team members, but were unsuccessful. No study data are available.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Research Compliance Officer
Organization
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso

Study Officials

  • Mohamed O Othman, MD

    Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2013

First Posted

December 20, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion

September 1, 2014

Study Completion

September 1, 2014

Last Updated

March 4, 2021

Results First Posted

March 4, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations