Phase 1/2 Study of Motolimod, Doxorubicin, and Durvalumab in Recurrent, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Phase 1/2 Study of Chemoimmunotherapy With Toll-like Receptor 8 Agonist Motolimod (VTX-2337) + Anti-PD-L1 Antibody MEDI4736 in Subjects With Recurrent, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer for Whom Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin is Indicated
1 other identifier
interventional
53
2 countries
5
Brief Summary
This is an ongoing Phase 1/2, open-label, multicenter, non-randomized study of MEDI4736 (durvalumab) in subjects with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who are scheduled to receive pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD).The primary objective of Phase 1 is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety profile, with a secondary objective to evaluate the clinical efficacy as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months (PFS-6). The primary objective of Phase 2 is the evaluation of clinical efficacy as measured by PFS-6. For both phases, secondary objectives include evaluation of clinical efficacy as measured by overall response rate, PFS, and overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability, and immunological responses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1 ovarian-cancer
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_1 ovarian-cancer
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 2, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 11, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 10, 2021
CompletedOctober 10, 2022
October 1, 2022
3 years
April 27, 2015
June 7, 2019
October 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
The primary endpoint in Phase 1 and a secondary endpoint in Phase 2 is the safety/tolerability of study treatment. Toxicity is graded in accordance with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03. Adverse events (AEs) are reported based on clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, and any other medically indicated assessments, including subject interviews, from the time informed consent is signed through 90 days after the last dose of study treatment. Treatment-emergent AEs are those that occurred or worsened after administration of the first dose of study treatment.
Up to 3.05 years
Progression-free Survival Rate at 6 Months (PFS-6) by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method
PFS-6 according to RECIST 1.1 is the primary endpoint in Phase 2 and a secondary endpoint in Phase 1, where PFS is measured from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of earliest disease progression or to the date of death, if disease progression does not occur. Per RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) is defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (Eisenhauer et al 2009).
Up to 6 months for each subject
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response by RECIST 1.1
Up to 36.6 months
Median PFS by RECIST 1.1 as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method
Up to 36.6 months
PFS-12 by RECIST 1.1 as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method
Up to 12 months for each subject
Number of Subjects With Best Overall Tumor Response by the Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST)
Up to 36.6 months
PFS-6 by irRECIST as Estimated Using the Kaplan-Meier Method
Up to 6 months for each subject
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Phase 1, Dose Level 0a
EXPERIMENTALSubjects received PLD (40 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every cycle) + durvalumab (3 mg/kg Q2W \[equivalent to 450 mg Q4W\] IV on Days 3 and 17 of every cycle) for up to 12 continuous 28-day cycles (Core Study), with extended durvalumab monotherapy permitted for subjects tolerating and benefiting from treatment. Prior to removal of motolimod from the study, subjects received motolimod (2.5 mg/m\^2 SC) on Days 3, 10, and 17 of Cycles 1-3 and Days 3 and 17 of Cycles 4-12.
Phase 1, Dose Level 0b
EXPERIMENTALSubjects received PLD (40 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every cycle) + durvalumab (1500 mg Q4W IV on Day 3 of every cycle) for up to 12 continuous 28-day cycles (Core Study), with extended durvalumab monotherapy permitted for subjects tolerating and benefiting from treatment. Prior to removal of motolimod from the study, subjects received motolimod (2.0 mg/m\^2 SC) on Days 3, 10, and 17 of Cycles 1-3 and Day 3 of Cycles 4-12.
Phase 1, Dose Level +1
EXPERIMENTALSubjects received PLD (40 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every cycle) + durvalumab (1500 mg Q4W IV on Day 3 of every cycle) for up to 12 continuous 28-day cycles (Core Study), with extended durvalumab monotherapy permitted for subjects tolerating and benefiting from treatment. Prior to removal of motolimod from the study, subjects received motolimod (2.5 mg/m\^2 SC) on Days 3, 10, and 17 of Cycles 1-3 and Day 3 of Cycles 4-12.
Phase 2
EXPERIMENTALSubjects received the MTD determined in Phase 1 (Dose Level +1), comprising PLD (40 mg/m\^2 IV on Day 1 of every cycle) + durvalumab (1500 mg Q4W IV on Day 3 of every cycle) for up to 12 continuous 28-day cycles (Core Study), with extended durvalumab monotherapy permitted for subjects tolerating and benefiting from treatment.
Interventions
Durvalumab is administered as an IV infusion over 60 ± 5 minutes.
PLD was administered as an IV infusion in accordance with local prescribing information.
Motolimod was administered as an SC injection. Within 30 minutes prior to each dose of motolimod, subjects were administered 650-1000 mg acetaminophen by mouth to help mitigate potential adverse events (AEs) commonly associated with the administration of motolimod (e.g., fever, myalgia). On days with concurrent motolimod and durvalumab dosing, motolimod administration occurred 30-60 minutes after the end of the durvalumab infusion. After completion of Phase 1, a protocol amendment was implemented to remove motolimod dosing from the study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must have had recurrent or persistent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma with measurable disease (as defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\] 1.1.) after first or second line platinum-based chemotherapy, for which treatment with PLD was indicated. Platinum-based therapy was defined as treatment with carboplatin, cisplatin or another organoplatinum compound. Platinum-resistant was defined as having a platinum-free interval of \< 12 months after first- or second-line platinum-based chemotherapy, or having disease progression while receiving second-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
- Subjects were allowed to have received, but were not required to have received:
- one additional cytotoxic regimen and/or poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitor for management of recurrent or persistent disease.
- biologic therapy (e.g., bevacizumab) as part of their primary treatment regimen or part of their treatment for management of recurrent or persistent disease.
- Histologic documentation of the original primary tumor.
- Documented radiographic disease progression \< 12 months after the last dose of first- or second-line platinum-based chemotherapy.
- Subjects in Phase 2 must have had disease amenable to biopsy and must have been willing to undergo pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies. Optional for Phase 1.
- Note: archival tissue was requested for all subjects preferably from primary tumor site prior to cancer treatment; however, archival tissue was not a requirement for study entry.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
- Laboratory parameters for vital functions should have been in the normal range. Laboratory abnormalities that were not clinically significant were generally permitted, except for the following laboratory parameters, which must have been within the ranges specified, regardless of clinical significance:
- Hemoglobin: ≥ 9 g/dL
- Neutrophil count: ≥ 1.5 x 10\^9/L
- Platelet count: ≥ 100,000/mm\^3
- Serum creatinine: ≤ 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN), or creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min (by Cockcroft-Gault formula)
- Serum bilirubin: ≤ 1.2 mg/dL
- +5 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Prior exposure to doxorubicin, PLD or any other anthracycline, motolimod and other toll-like receptor agonists, durvalumab or checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibodies.
- Subjects with platinum-refractory disease, defined as disease progression while receiving first line platinum-based therapy.
- Clinically significant persistent immune-related adverse events following prior therapy.
- Subjects with history or evidence upon physical examination of central nervous system disease, including primary brain tumor, seizures not controlled with standard medical therapy, any brain metastases, or, within 6 months prior to Day 1 of this study, history of cerebrovascular accident (stroke), transient ischemic attack or subarachnoid hemorrhage.
- Subjects with clinically significant cardiovascular disease. This included:
- Resistant hypertension.
- Myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months prior to Day 1 of the study.
- History of serious ventricular arrhythmia (i.e., ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) or cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic medications, except for atrial fibrillation that is well controlled with anti-arrhythmic medication.
- Baseline ejection fraction ≤ 50% as assessed by echocardiogram or multiple-gated acquisition.
- New York Heart Association Class II or higher congestive heart failure.
- Grade 2 or higher peripheral ischemia, except for brief (\< 24 hours) episodes of ischemia managed non-surgically and without permanent deficit.
- History of pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease.
- Active, suspected or prior documented autoimmune disease (including inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, Wegner's granulomatosis, active Hashimoto's thyroiditis, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, scleroderma and its variants, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis). Vitiligo, type I diabetes mellitus, residual hypothyroidism due to autoimmune condition only requiring hormone replacement, psoriasis not requiring systemic treatment, or conditions not expected to recur in the absence of an external trigger were permitted.
- Other malignancy within 2 years prior to Day 1 of the study, except for those treated with surgical intervention only.
- Subjects with clinical symptoms or signs of gastrointestinal obstruction and/or who required drainage gastrostomy tube and/or parenteral hydration or nutrition.
- +18 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Researchlead
- MedImmune LLCcollaborator
- Celgenecollaborator
- Cancer Research Institute, New York Citycollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Research Facitlity
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States
Research Facility
New York, New York, 10065, United States
Research Facility
Hilliard, Ohio, 43026, United States
Research Facility
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States
Research Facility
Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland
Related Publications (2)
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
PMID: 19097774BACKGROUNDBohnsack O, Hoos A, Ludajic K. Adaptation of the immune related response criteria: irRECIST. Ann Oncol. 2014 Sep;25(suppl 4):iv361-iv72 [Abstract 4958]. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu342.23.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jonathan Skipper PhD
- Organization
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
George Coukos, MD, PhD
University of Lausanne Hospitals
- STUDY CHAIR
Bradley J Monk, MD
Arizona Oncology
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2015
First Posted
May 1, 2015
Study Start
December 2, 2015
Primary Completion
December 11, 2018
Study Completion
June 10, 2021
Last Updated
October 10, 2022
Results First Posted
September 23, 2019
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share