NCT02405507

Brief Summary

Wheat germ is a by-product of the wheat-milling industry with high nutritional value and therefore could be used as a raw source for the preparation of food products such as bread, cookies, muffins, etc. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of ingesting wheat breads supplemented with wheat germ on gastrointestinal discomfort, blood cholesterol and postprandial glycaemic response in healthy human volunteers.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
55

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 healthy-volunteers

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2015

Typical duration for phase_2 healthy-volunteers

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 11, 2015

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2015

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

November 7, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

March 11, 2015

Last Update Submit

November 5, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Gastrointestinal DiscomfortWheat germConstipationGlycaemic IndexBlood Cholesterol LevelGlycaemic ResponseCholesterolPAC-SYMGut Microbiota

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Changes in mean Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) score from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 7, 9, 11 and 13

    A validated PAC-SYM questionnaire will be used. PAC-SYM is a 12-item, self-administered questionnaire used to measure severity of symptoms over the past 2 weeks in patients with constipation. The PAC-SYM questionnaire has been demonstrated and documented to have internal consistency, reproducibility, validity, sensitivity, and responsiveness. PAC-SYM items are rated on a 5-point scale (0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe) and grouped into three subscales related to abdominal symptoms (bloating, discomfort, pain, and cramps), stool symptoms (incomplete bowel movement, false alarm, straining, too hard, and too small), and rectal symptoms (painful bowel movement, burning, and bleeding or tearing). The total score and subscale scores are computed by taking the mean of item responses (score range 0-4). A reduction in score reflects an improvement in symptoms. Cultural adaptation and linguistic validation of the PAC-SYM for Portugal was performed by Mapi Research.

    at the end of week 0 (after 2-week run-in period), at the end of weeks 2 and 4 (during 4-week intake period), at the end of weeks 7 and 9 (during 5-week washout period), at the end of weeks 11 and 13 (during 4-week intake period after crossover)

  • Changes in fasting serum total cholesterol from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4

    at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)

  • Changes in fasting serum triglycerides from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4

    at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)

  • Changes in fasting serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4

    at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)

  • Changes in fasting serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4

    at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)

  • Changes in fasting serum C-reactive protein from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4

    at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)

  • Changes in capillary blood glucose from baseline to visit 2 and 4

    0, 30, 60 and 120 minutes post-meal: at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period) and at visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Changes in mean Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) score from baseline to weeks 2, 4, 7, 9, 11 and 13

    at the end of week 0 (after 2-week run-in period), at the end of weeks 2 and 4 (during 4-week intake period), at the end of weeks 7 and 9 (during 5-week washout period), at the end of weeks 11 and 13 (during 4-week intake period after crossover)

  • Changes in intestinal microbiota from baseline to visit 2, 3 and 4

    at visit 1 (after 2-week run-in period), visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period), and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)

  • Changes in mean daily abdominal discomfort score from baseline to weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13

    daily during run-in period (weeks -1 and 0), intake period (weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13), and washout period (weeks 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9)

  • Changes in stool consistency from baseline to weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13

    at days with stool during run-in period (weeks -1 and 0), intake period (weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13), and washout period ( weeks 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9)

  • Changes in stool frequency from baseline to weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13

    at days with stool during run-in period (weeks -1 and 0), intake period (weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13), and washout period ( weeks 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Adverse events

    at visit 2 (after 4-week intake period), visit 3 (after 5-week washout period), and visit 4 (after 4-week intake period after crossover)

Study Arms (2)

wheat bread with wheat germ

EXPERIMENTAL

wheat bread with wheat germ supplementation

Dietary Supplement: wheat bread with wheat germ

wheat bread without wheat germ

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

wheat bread without wheat germ supplementation

Dietary Supplement: wheat bread without wheat germ

Interventions

wheat bread with wheat germDIETARY_SUPPLEMENT
wheat bread with wheat germ
wheat bread without wheat germ

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult men or women
  • Age 18 - 60 years
  • Healthy volunteers free of chronic diseases with relevant effect on the gastrointestinal system or on visceral motility
  • Without a diagnosis of any digestive disease including functional bowel disorders such as IBS
  • Non-diabetic, no gastric bypass surgery
  • Have a fasting plasma glucose (finger-stick) \<100 mg/dl (\<5.5 mmol/L)
  • Non-smoker
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject under prescription for medication for digestive symptoms such as anti-spasmodic, laxatives and anti-diarrheic drugs or other digestive auxiliaries
  • Relevant history, presence of any medical disorder or intake of medication / dietary supplements, potentially interfering with this trial at screening
  • Subjects with stool frequency of ≤ 1 stool every 7 days
  • Subjects not willing to avoid pre- and probiotics for the duration of the study
  • Intake of antibiotics in the last 4 weeks and laxatives in the last 2 weeks
  • Current use of medication for lowering blood cholesterol or glucose
  • Change of dietary habits within the 4 weeks prior to screening (for instance start of a diet high in fibres)
  • Pregnant subject or subject planning to become pregnant during the study; breast-feeding subject
  • Subjects with history of drug, alcohol or other substances abuse, or other factors limiting their ability to co-operate during the study
  • Participants anticipating a change in their lifestyle or physical activity levels since this may also influence the results
  • Known food intolerance or allergy
  • Subject involved in any clinical or food study within the preceding month

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

PtCRIN

Lisbon, Portugal

Location

CINTESIS - Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto

Porto, 4200-450, Portugal

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Moreira-Rosario A, Marques C, Pinheiro H, Norberto S, Sintra D, Teixeira JA, Calhau C, Azevedo LF. Daily intake of wheat germ-enriched bread may promote a healthy gut bacterial microbiota: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Nutr. 2020 Aug;59(5):1951-1961. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-02045-x. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

  • Moreira-Rosario A, Pinheiro H, Marques C, Teixeira JA, Calhau C, Azevedo LF. Does intake of bread supplemented with wheat germ have a preventive role on cardiovascular disease risk markers in healthy volunteers? A randomised, controlled, crossover trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e023662. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023662.

  • Moreira-Rosario A, Pinheiro H, Calhau C, Azevedo LF. Can wheat germ have a beneficial effect on human health? A study protocol for a randomised crossover controlled trial to evaluate its health effects. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 10;6(11):e013098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013098.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Constipation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Conceição Calhau, PhD

    CINTESIS, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2015

First Posted

April 1, 2015

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion

October 1, 2016

Study Completion

March 1, 2017

Last Updated

November 7, 2019

Record last verified: 2017-05

Locations