NCT02400606

Brief Summary

The aim of the study was to explore the effect of actively constructing Virtual patient (VP) cases compared with solving VP cases using 'Web-SP', Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden on knowledge gains and skills transfer in a group of pre-clerkship medical students.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable healthy

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 17, 2015

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 27, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

March 27, 2015

Status Verified

March 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

March 17, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 26, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

constructing VPsknowledge and skills transfer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluation of the medical students' management of a simulated patient encounter using a RIME-structured scoring form

    The scoring form includes assessment on the roles Reporter, Interpreter, Manager and Educators and has been validated for patient encounters like described below. The requirements for the RIME elements have been defined in with a cardiology professor and a consultant respiratory physician. The medical students are exposed to two encounters with simulated patients after working with the virtual patients on their own. The students will obtain history and perform physical examination from the simulated patient for 15 minutes. The will be provided a journal form that can be quickly filled in, the patient encounter is video recorded. After this they have 20 minutes to write the journal in an electronic format. The video recorded patient encounter and the journal will be assessed by two physicians who have experience in rating medical students performance with the scoring form, the raters are blinded for if the students belong to the intervention arm of the study or not.

    After working with the virtual patient cases for one week +/- 3 days

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Multiple Choice/Answers Questionnaire

    When entering the study and after working with the virtual patient cases for one week +/- 3 days

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention group were presented with a short case overview introducing four cardiopulmonary VP cases as well as the final diagnosis and had to complete the history, physical findings, and lab results, i.e. constructing VP cases.

Other: Constructing VP cases

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The participants were presented with a short case overview introducing four cardiopulmonary VP cases to be solved, i.e. solving VP cases.

Other: Solving VP cases

Interventions

The participants were presented with a short case overview. The control group solved the cases, whereas the intervention group also received the final diagnosis and had to complete the history, physical findings, and lab results. After a week, participants completed a transfer test involving two standardized patients presenting a respiratory case and a cardiology case, respectively. Performances were video-recorded and subsequently assessed by two blinded raters using the Reporter-Interpreter- Manager-Educator (RIME) framework. Knowledge gains were assessed using a pre- and post-test of a 95-item Multiple-Response-Questionnaire (MRQ).

Intervention

See above

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • fourth-year medical students, University of Copenhagen
  • pre-study participation in the mandatory patient encounter skills course

You may not qualify if:

  • medical students who had taken the three pre-clerkship years at other universities, because of curriculum discrepancies

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Officials

  • Charlotte Ringsted, MD MHPE PHD

    Centre for Clinical Education

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PHD student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2015

First Posted

March 27, 2015

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion

February 1, 2013

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

March 27, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-03