The Effect of Constructing Virtual Patient Cases
The Effect of Constructing Versus Solving Virtual Patient Cases on Transfer of Learning: A Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
39
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of the study was to explore the effect of actively constructing Virtual patient (VP) cases compared with solving VP cases using 'Web-SP', Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden on knowledge gains and skills transfer in a group of pre-clerkship medical students.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy
Started Jan 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable healthy
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2015
CompletedMarch 27, 2015
March 1, 2015
1 month
March 17, 2015
March 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of the medical students' management of a simulated patient encounter using a RIME-structured scoring form
The scoring form includes assessment on the roles Reporter, Interpreter, Manager and Educators and has been validated for patient encounters like described below. The requirements for the RIME elements have been defined in with a cardiology professor and a consultant respiratory physician. The medical students are exposed to two encounters with simulated patients after working with the virtual patients on their own. The students will obtain history and perform physical examination from the simulated patient for 15 minutes. The will be provided a journal form that can be quickly filled in, the patient encounter is video recorded. After this they have 20 minutes to write the journal in an electronic format. The video recorded patient encounter and the journal will be assessed by two physicians who have experience in rating medical students performance with the scoring form, the raters are blinded for if the students belong to the intervention arm of the study or not.
After working with the virtual patient cases for one week +/- 3 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Multiple Choice/Answers Questionnaire
When entering the study and after working with the virtual patient cases for one week +/- 3 days
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention group were presented with a short case overview introducing four cardiopulmonary VP cases as well as the final diagnosis and had to complete the history, physical findings, and lab results, i.e. constructing VP cases.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe participants were presented with a short case overview introducing four cardiopulmonary VP cases to be solved, i.e. solving VP cases.
Interventions
The participants were presented with a short case overview. The control group solved the cases, whereas the intervention group also received the final diagnosis and had to complete the history, physical findings, and lab results. After a week, participants completed a transfer test involving two standardized patients presenting a respiratory case and a cardiology case, respectively. Performances were video-recorded and subsequently assessed by two blinded raters using the Reporter-Interpreter- Manager-Educator (RIME) framework. Knowledge gains were assessed using a pre- and post-test of a 95-item Multiple-Response-Questionnaire (MRQ).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- fourth-year medical students, University of Copenhagen
- pre-study participation in the mandatory patient encounter skills course
You may not qualify if:
- medical students who had taken the three pre-clerkship years at other universities, because of curriculum discrepancies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rigshospitalet, Denmarklead
- University of Copenhagencollaborator
- Centre for Clinical Educationcollaborator
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Charlotte Ringsted, MD MHPE PHD
Centre for Clinical Education
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PHD student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2015
First Posted
March 27, 2015
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 27, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03