NCT02393053

Brief Summary

Background: This randomized controlled clinical study of split-mouth aimed to compare non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG) with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the treatment of Miller Class I or II gingival recessions. Methods: Twelve patients with Miller Class I or II (≥ 2 mm) bilateral recessions in maxillary premolars or canines were selected. The recessions were randomly assigned to receive SCTG (Control Group) or BFPG (Test Group). The clinical parameters of Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), Probing Depth (PD), Gingival Recession (GR), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), Width of Keratinized Tissue (WKT), Thickness of Keratinized Tissue (TKT) and Gingival Margin to the Acrylic Guide (GM-AG) were evaluated at baseline, and in the postoperative periods of 1, 3, and 6 months. The percentage of root coverage was also evaluated. Data were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni method and t-test (p\<0.05).

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
12

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2010

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2010

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2011

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 6, 2015

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 19, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

March 19, 2015

Status Verified

March 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

March 6, 2015

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Gingival RecessionCase-Control StudiesAdipose Tissue

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in Probing Depth (PD)

    measure from the gingival margin (GM) up to the bottom of the gingival sulcus

    Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively

  • Change in Gingival Recession (GR)

    measure from the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) up to the GM

    Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively

  • Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)

    measure from the CEJ up to the bottom of the gingival sulcus

    Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively

  • Change in Width of Keratinized Tissue (WKT)

    measure from the Mucogingival Junction (MGJ) up to the GM

    Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively

  • Change in Thickness of Keratinized Tissue (TKT)

    measure performed with the aid of a North Carolina periodontal probe (UNC-15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA) perpendicularly placed along the tooth axis in the most central portion of the keratinized tissue, between the GM and the MGJ

    Baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months respectively

Study Arms (2)

subepithelial connective tissue graft

SHAM COMPARATOR

Surgery: Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft for gingival recession

Procedure: Treatment with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG)

non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft

EXPERIMENTAL

Surgery: Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft for gingival recession

Procedure: Treatment with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG)

Interventions

Miller Class I or II gingival recessions were treated with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG)

subepithelial connective tissue graft

Miller Class I or II gingival recessions were treated with non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft (BFPG)

non-pedicled buccal fat pad graft

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with Miller Class I or II gingival recessions located bilaterally in the vestibular surface of upper premolars or canines ≥ to 2 mm
  • Patients who had recessions with some differences between the right and the left sides ≤ to 3 mm
  • Non-smokers
  • Non-pregnant patients
  • Systemically healthy patients
  • Periodontally healthy patients with no contraindications for periodontal surgery
  • Patients who did not take any kind of medicine that could interfere with the health of gingival and periodontal tissue
  • Teeth with probing depth (PD) \<3 mm and without bleeding on probing (BOP)
  • Teeth with no caries or restorations in the cervical region
  • Region that had not been undergone any periodontal surgery before

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (6)

  • Kassab MM, Badawi H, Dentino AR. Treatment of gingival recession. Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Jan;54(1):129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2009.08.009.

    PMID: 20103476BACKGROUND
  • Zucchelli G, Testori T, De Sanctis M. Clinical and anatomical factors limiting treatment outcomes of gingival recession: a new method to predetermine the line of root coverage. J Periodontol. 2006 Apr;77(4):714-21. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050038.

    PMID: 16584355BACKGROUND
  • Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S44-62. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12182.

    PMID: 24641000BACKGROUND
  • de Sanctis M, Baldini N, Goracci C, Zucchelli G. Coronally advanced flap associated with a connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple recession defects in mandibular posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):623-30.

    PMID: 22140664BACKGROUND
  • Bittencourt S, Ribeiro Edel P, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Nociti FH, Casati MZ. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study. J Periodontol. 2009 Jul;80(7):1076-82. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080498.

    PMID: 19563287BACKGROUND
  • El Haddad SA, Abd El Razzak MY, El Shall M. Use of pedicled buccal fat pad in root coverage of severe gingival recession defect. J Periodontol. 2008 Jul;79(7):1271-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070176.

    PMID: 18597611BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gingival DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesPeriodontal Atrophy

Study Officials

  • Flares Baratto Filho, PhD

    Universidade Positivo

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Full Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2015

First Posted

March 19, 2015

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion

February 1, 2011

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

March 19, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-03