Clinical Comparison Between Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to test a surgical technique for the treatment of gingival recessions. The hypothesis of the study is to promote greater root coverage and better healing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 3, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2011
CompletedNovember 16, 2011
November 1, 2011
10 months
August 3, 2010
November 11, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of root coverage
Clinical parameters will be assessed after 6 months of surgical procedures.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Keratinized Tissue
6 months
Study Arms (1)
test and control
EXPERIMENTALThe test and control technique will be tested in a split-mouth design.
Interventions
Test and control technique to treat gingival recessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Recession defects are Miller's class I or II and do not vary more or equal than 3 mm
- Main complaint aesthetic issues or dentine hypersensitivity
- The patient must be a candidate for bilateral root coverage procedure
- Patient shows sufficient plaque control (FMPS \< 20%)
- The patient is able to comply with the study-related procedures such as exercising good oral hygiene and attending all follow-up procedures
- The patient is able to fully understand the nature of the proposed surgery and is able to provide a signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Smokers
- Systemic diseases
- Pregnants or lactating
- Periodontal disease
- General contraindications for dental and/or surgical treatment are present
- The patient has a history of malignancy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy for malignancy within the past five years
- The patient is taking medications or having treatments which have an effect on mucosal healing in general (e.g. steroids, large doses of anti-inflammatory drugs)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto USP
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14040-904, Brazil
Related Publications (1)
Ayub LG, Ramos UD, Reino DM, Grisi MF, Taba M Jr, Souza SL, Palioto DB, Novaes AB Jr. A Randomized comparative clinical study of two surgical procedures to improve root coverage with the acellular dermal matrix graft. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Sep;39(9):871-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01915.x. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
PMID: 22712624DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arthur B. Novaes Júnior, PhD
University of Sao Paulo
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lauro G. Ayub, MSD student
University of Sao Paulo
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical comparison between two surgical techniques with acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of gingival recessions
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 3, 2010
First Posted
August 5, 2010
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
October 1, 2011
Last Updated
November 16, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-11