Composite Resin Plus Connective Tissue Graft.
1 other identifier
interventional
36
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the clinical, aesthetic and patient-centered parameters of connective tissue graft associated or not with composite resin for the treatment of gingival recession.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2015
CompletedApril 23, 2015
April 1, 2015
3.2 years
April 3, 2015
April 22, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of defect coverage
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Root coverage esthetic score
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Connective tissue graft (CTG)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter local anesthesia, the surgical procedure performed was the trapezoidal-type of CAF (de Sanctis \& Zucchelli, 2007). After the flap was raised, the exposed root surface was gently scaled and planed until it became smooth. Afterward, a thin and small connective tissue graft that was sutured over the root surface. Then, the flap was coronally positioned and sutured to completely cover the graft.
Connective tissue graft plus composite resin restoration.
EXPERIMENTALAfter local anesthesia, the surgical procedure performed was the trapezoidal-type of CAF (de Sanctis \& Zucchelli, 2007). After the flap was raised, a sterile rubber dam was placed to isolate the operative field and the non-carious cervical lesion restoration was performed with a nanocomposite resin (Filtek Supreme - 3M ESPE - St. Paul, MN, USA), following the manufacturer's instructions. Afterward, a thin and small connective tissue graft that was sutured over the restoration surface. Then, the flap was coronally positioned and sutured to completely cover the graft.
Interventions
Periodontal surgical technique to treat gingival recessions
Restorative procedure do treat tooth structure loss
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- presenting Miller class I or II gingival recession in the maxillary canines or premolars associated with non-carious cervical lesion;
- teeth included in the study should present pulp vitality;
- patients presenting no signs of active periodontal disease and full-mouth plaque and bleeding score ≤ 20%;
- patients older than 18 years old;
- probing depth ˂ 3 mm in the included teeth;
- patients who agreed to participate and signed an informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- patients with systemic problems (cardiovascular, blood dyscrasias, immunodeficiency, and diabetes, among others) that will contraindicate the surgical procedure
- patients taking medications known to interfere with the wound healing process or that contraindicate the surgical procedure
- smokers or pregnant women
- patients who underwent periodontal surgery in the area of interest; and
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Santamaria MP, da Silva Feitosa D, Casati MZ, Nociti FH Jr, Sallum AW, Sallum EA. Randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating connective tissue graft plus resin-modified glass ionomer restoration for the treatment of gingival recession associated with non-carious cervical lesion: 2-year follow-up. J Periodontol. 2013 Sep;84(9):e1-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120447. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
PMID: 23368948BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mauro P Santamaria, PhD
ICT-UNESP
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2015
First Posted
April 22, 2015
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-04