Cryoablation for Phantom Limb Pain
Percutaneous Image Guided Cryoablation for the Treatment of Refractory Phantom Limb Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
23
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if treatment with percutaneous cryoablation yields significant differences in the evaluative criteria of Phantom Limb Syndrome (PLS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 19, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 16, 2016
CompletedMarch 22, 2017
March 1, 2017
1.9 years
February 9, 2015
March 21, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Feasibility of cryoablation, defined by number of participants, in which cryoablation was performed successfully
Feasibility, defined by number of participants, in which cryoablation was performed successfully
Post-Cryoablation
Safety of cryoablation procedure, measured by the number of subjects that had cryoablation procedure events (CPEs).
Safety is measured by the number of subjects that had cryoablation procedure events (CPEs). CPEs are device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAE) or adverse events (AE) categorized as clinical signs or symptoms of infection (fever), hemorrhage (pain, imaging changes), nerve pain worsening, or toxicity of any kind (confusion, seizure).
56 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in pain scores on visual analogue scale (VAS )
Baseline, day 56
Change in quality of life, measured using Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ)
Baseline, day 56
Study Arms (1)
Cryoablation
EXPERIMENTALAmputee subjects experiencing phantom limb syndrome (PLS) will receive cryoablation
Interventions
Subjects who respond to lidocaine nerve block will undergo CT guided cryoablation of the affected nerve stump with a 17g Galil Medical Ice Sphere cryoablation needle.
Under CT guidance, the corresponding nerve will be targeted with a 17g probe. Two freeze-thaw cycles will be undertaken. The probe will be removed and a final scan obtained.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects are status post (s/p) amputation of an upper or lower limb. That is, the amputation is not congenital.
- Refractory pain symptoms, following tissue healing(postoperatively, or post injury) are related to amputation as determined by referring physician and investigator, to include: stump pain, phantom pain, unpleasant phantom sensations, and/or undesirable and/or life-limiting kinesthetic sensations. The character, frequency, location, description, and exacerbation or relieving elements will be recorded.
- Patients will be questioned as to the location of their sensation, be it pain, movement, burning, tingling, or other. The location of their pain will be correlated with the corresponding proximal nerve stump.
- Positive anesthetic/steroid block, as performed under CT guidance in an analogous fashion to the cryoablation procedure.
- Absence of infection
- Absence of coagulopathy
- Ability and willingness of patient to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Active infection
- Underlying congenital segmentation or other spinal anomalies that result in differential nerve root pressures
- Significant spinal stenosis interpreted as "severe" on any cross sectional imaging study
- Pregnant or planning to become pregnant
- Immunosuppression
- History or laboratory results indicative of any significant cardiac, endocrine, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, infectious, metabolic, urologic, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, psychiatric, renal, neoplastic, or other disorder that in the opinion of the Principal Investigator would preclude the safe performance of cryoablation.
- Uncorrectable coagulopathies
- Concurrent participation in another investigational trial involving systemic administration of agents or within the previous 30 days.
- Have undergone a previous surgical intervention - post amputation - that may have altered the target nerve.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emory Universitylead
- Boston Scientific Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John D Prologo, MD
Emory University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2015
First Posted
February 19, 2015
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 16, 2016
Study Completion
December 16, 2016
Last Updated
March 22, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03