Azacytidine (Vidaza®) Versus Fludarabine and Cytarabine (Fluga Scheme) in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
FLUGAZA
A PHASE III, MULTICENTRE, RANDOMIZED, OPEN LABEL CLINICAL TRIAL OF AZACYTIDINE (VIDAZA®) VERSUS FLUDARABINE AND CYTARABINE (FLUGA SCHEME) IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA.
1 other identifier
interventional
289
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The hypothesis is that the replacement of the standard fludarabine and cytarabine based therapy by azacytidine could result in an improvement of RFS and OS rates in the experimental arm. To fulfill the medical needs in such frail and elderly population, improvements in terms of atileukemic efficacy in the azacytidine experimental arm should be attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Oct 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 28, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 28, 2019
CompletedApril 6, 2020
April 1, 2020
4.1 years
December 10, 2014
April 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy (overall survival (OS) attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL.
To evaluate the overall survival (OS) in one year treatment with 2 first-line regimens in newly diagnosed elderly patients: 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy based on fludarabine and cytarabine (FLUGA scheme) followed by maintenance with reduced doses(Mini-FLUGA) (standard treatment arm) versus subcutaneous azacitidine cycles (experimental treatment arm).
4 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Efficacy (Event free survival (EFS)
4 years
Efficacy (Duration of remission.)
4 years
Efficacy (Overall survival) Efficcacy
3 years
Safety (Compare hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity)
3 years
Study Arms (2)
fludarabine cytarabine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPriming with daily administration of subcutaneous G-CSF (lenograstim or filgrastim 5 mcg /kg / day, days -1, 1 and 2) (not given if hyperleukocytosis\> 25 x 109/l), followed by: * Oral fludarabine (40 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5) and subcutaneous cytarabine (75mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5) (FLUGA scheme) (fludarabine and cytarabine only days 1 to 4 if age ≥75 years), OR * Fludarabine (25 mg/m2/day) and cytarabine (75 mg/m2/day infusion of 6 hours) on their intravenous formulations if the patient is hospitalized (patients with hyperleukocytosis or other unfavourable conditions). Treatment cycles every 28 days
Azacitidine
EXPERIMENTALSubcutaneous Azacitidine 75 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 7. Treatment cycles every 28 days.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Having voluntarily given informed consent before performing any test that is not part of
- routine care of patients.
- \- Age greater than or equal to 65.
- \- Morphological diagnosis of non-promyelocytic AML according to the WHO criteria.
- \- Newly diagnosed AML.
- \- ECOG performance status \<4.
- \- Ability and willingness to comply with the schedule of study visits.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Genetic diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia.
- \- Patients with AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or chronic myeloproloferative syndrome who have been previously treated with antileukemic agents
- (hypomethylating or standard chemotherapy). Treatment with hydroxyurea prior to randomization is allowed.
- \- Serum creatinine ≥ 250 mmol / l (≥ 2.5 mg/dL) (unless attributed to AML).
- \- Bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase or ALT \> 5 times the value of the upper limit of normal (unless attributed to AML) .
- \- Presence of an active and/or non controlled pathology different to AML which is severe and life-threatening, that in the investigator's opinion, prevents the subject participation in the study.
- \- Other active concomitant malignancy or whose remission is less than one year from the screening day (except carcinoma in situ).
- \- Presence of any psychiatric illness or medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, prevents the subject participation in the study.
- \- Life expectancy less than X months.
- \- Inability of the patient or his legal representative to understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- PETHEMA Foundationlead
- Dynamic Solutionscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
Valencia, 46026, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Ayala R, Rapado I, Onecha E, Martinez-Cuadron D, Carreno-Tarragona G, Bergua JM, Vives S, Algarra JL, Tormo M, Martinez P, Serrano J, Herrera P, Ramos F, Salamero O, Lavilla E, Gil C, Lopez Lorenzo JL, Vidriales MB, Labrador J, Falantes JF, Sayas MJ, Paiva B, Barragan E, Prosper F, Sanz MA, Martinez-Lopez J, Montesinos P, On Behalf Of The Programa Para El Estudio de la Terapeutica En Hemopatias Malignas Pethema Cooperative Study Group. The Mutational Landscape of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Predicts Responses and Outcomes in Elderly Patients from the PETHEMA-FLUGAZA Phase 3 Clinical Trial. Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 18;13(10):2458. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102458.
PMID: 34070172DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pau Montesinos, Dr
PETHEMA Foundation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2014
First Posted
December 18, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 28, 2018
Study Completion
October 28, 2019
Last Updated
April 6, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04