Randomised Controlled Trial of Intubation With the McGrath Series 5 Video Laryngoscope vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The simplicity of use and intuitive function of the McGrath video-laryngoscope suggests it may have a bigger role than as a back-up to conventional direct laryngoscopy and could possibly be the first-line laryngoscope for situations where difficult intubations are more likely or more hazardous. The incidence of difficult or failed intubation for an individual anaesthetist is related to their experience, decreasing as experience increases. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the McGrath laryngoscope when used by relatively inexperienced anaesthetists, who are those most likely to encounter difficulties. The null hypotheses to be tested is that there is no difference between the Macintosh and McGrath laryngoscope in terms of ease and success in intubation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 25, 2010
CompletedAugust 2, 2011
March 1, 2008
6 months
March 4, 2008
February 25, 2010
July 29, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intubation Time
Time from anaesthetist picking up laryngoscope until 1st upward capnograph deflection after intubation
At intubation
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Difference in Learning to Use the Scopes
At analysis
Quality of View of the Vocal Cords
At analysis
Number of Attempts to Secure Successful Intubation
At analysis
Incidence of Initial Oesophageal Intubation
At analysis
Number of Intubations Taking More Than 70 Seconds
At Analysis
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intubation c McGrath videolaryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORTracheal Intubation using McGrath video-laryngoscope
Intubation using Macintosh Laryngoscope
ACTIVE COMPARATORTracheal intubation using Macintosh Laryngoscope
Interventions
Tracheal intubation, using Mcgrath video-laryngoscope
Tracheal intubation using Macintosh Laryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (18 years and over) scheduled for elective surgery whose anaesthetic plan would normally include oral intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope blade after induction of general anaesthesia and who have given valid informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients requiring special techniques for intubation such as rapid sequence induction
- Adults who have learning difficulties
- Are unconscious or very severely ill
- Have a terminal illness; are in an emergency situation
- Have a mental illness
- Have dementia
- Prisoners
- Those who could be considered to have a particularly dependent relationship with the investigator and other vulnerable groups.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NHS Grampianlead
Study Sites (1)
Aberdeen Royal Hospitals, NHS Grampian
Aberdeen, UK, AB25 2ZN, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Walker L, Brampton W, Halai M, Hoy C, Lee E, Scott I, McLernon DJ. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Sep;103(3):440-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep191. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
PMID: 19605408RESULT
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- W Brampton
- Organization
- NHS Grampian
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
william brampton
NHS Grampian
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2008
First Posted
March 12, 2008
Study Start
February 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
August 2, 2011
Results First Posted
March 25, 2010
Record last verified: 2008-03