Comprehensive Cardiac CT Versus Exercise Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (2)
CRESCENT2
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Multi-center, randomized-controlled trial comparing a comprehensive cardiac CT protocol with standard stress testing in patients with stable chest pain complaints.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Aug 2013
Typical duration for phase_3
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 14, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 4, 2016
August 1, 2016
2.8 years
November 11, 2014
August 3, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of negative invasive angiograms (as percentage of total population)
Number of performed invasive angiograms with no CAD requiring intervention
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Chest pain complaints
6 months
Quality of life
6 months
Major adverse event rate
6 months
Radiation exposure
6 months
Number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures
6 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Comprehensive cardiac CT
EXPERIMENTALTiered cardiac CT protocol: 1. CT calcium scan 2. CT angiography (if calcium scan positive or high pre-test probability) 3. CT perfusion (if \>50% stenosis on CTA, or cannot be ruled out)
Standard care
NO INTERVENTIONStandard diagnostic management of suspected CAD, using stress testing
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women aged \>18 years.
- Chest pain symptoms suspicious of coronary heart disease.
- Pre-test probability of coronary artery disease \>10%
You may not qualify if:
- History of CAD: prior myocardial infarction or revascularization procedure
- Contra-indication to radiation exposure (CT/SPECT): pregnancy
- Contra-indication to iodine contrast media: renal failure, iodine allergy
- Contra-indications to adenosine
- Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Albert Schweizerzieknhuis
Dordrecht, 3318 AT, Netherlands
Maastricht University Medical Center
Maastricht, 6229 HX, Netherlands
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, 3015CE, Netherlands
Maasstadziekenhuis
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Lubbers M, Coenen A, Kofflard M, Bruning T, Kietselaer B, Galema T, Kock M, Niezen A, Das M, van Gent M, van den Bos EJ, van Woerkens L, Musters P, Kooij S, Nous F, Budde R, Hunink M, Nieman K. Comprehensive Cardiac CT With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Functional Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The Multicenter, Randomized CRESCENT-II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Nov;11(11):1625-1636. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
PMID: 29248657DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Koen Nieman, MD, PhD
Erasmus Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr K Nieman
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2014
First Posted
November 14, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2016
Study Completion
May 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 4, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share