Gadobutrol/Gadavist-enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) to Detect Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
GadaCAD 1
Multicenter Open-label Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Gadobutrol-enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) for Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) in Subjects With Known or Suspected CAD by a Blinded Image Analysis
2 other identifiers
interventional
426
7 countries
23
Brief Summary
Participants being evaluated for suspected or known Coronary artery Disease (CAD) based on signs and/or symptoms, will be invited to participate in the study. The duration for a participant in the study may range from 2 days to 4-6 weeks. One to four visits to the study doctor will be required. This study will investigate the diagnostic results of gadobutrol-enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) images regarding the detection (sensitivity) and exclusion (specificity) of coronary artery disease utilizing a uniform image acquisition software. The CMR images will be tested either against the results from routine clinical Coronary Angiography (CA) or those from Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA), which is used as the standard of reference. The CA/CTA may have been performed up to 4 weeks prior to enrollment or be scheduled up to 4/6 weeks after the study. CMRI and CA/CTA images will be collected for an independent image review (blinded read).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease
Started Jul 2013
Typical duration for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease
23 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 19, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 10, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 16, 2018
CompletedMay 16, 2018
April 1, 2018
1.7 years
June 27, 2013
March 6, 2018
April 17, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI (Based on RPS) - Primary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Blinded Readers' Assessment
Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score (RPS), 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative).
0 to 30/40 minute (min) post-injection
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI (Based on RPS) - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment
Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score (RPS), 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=70% for secondary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative). This additional secondary analysis of sensitivity was prospective analysis.
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI (Based on RPS) - Primary Analysis of Specificity Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment
Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score (RPS), 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Specificity= true negative/ (true negative + false positive).
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI (Based on RPS) - Additional Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment
Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score (RPS), 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=70% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Specificity= true negative/ (true negative + false positive). This additional secondary analysis of specificity was prospective analysis.
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Primary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment
Presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI versus the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images (based on regional perfusion/regional wall motion score of the 6 myocardial regions) was calculated by blinded readers' assessment. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative).
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment
Presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI versus the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images (based on regional perfusion/regional wall motion score of the 6 myocardial regions) was calculated by blinded readers' assessment. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=70% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative). This additional secondary analysis of sensitivity was prospective analysis.
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Investigator's Assessment
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on Investigator's Assessment
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on Investigator's Assessment
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on Investigator's Assessment
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on Investigator's Assessment
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg body weight
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received gadobutrol at the total approved standard dose of 0.1 millimole per kilogram body weight (mmol/kg BW) in 2 separate bolus injections: 0.05 mmol/kg BW at peak pharmacologic stress and 0.05 mmol/kg BW at rest via a power injector.
Interventions
Participants received gadobutrol at the total approved standard dose of 0.1 millimole per kilogram body weight (mmol/kg BW) in 2 separate bolus injections: 0.05 mmol/kg BW at peak pharmacologic stress and 0.05 mmol/kg BW at rest via a power injector.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female participants aged ≥18 years
- Participants with suspected or known CAD based on signs and/or (typical or atypical) chest pain who have routine CA without intervention or CTA within 4 weeks around gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI
- Willingness to undergo stress/rest CMRI and to follow directions and complete all study procedures
- Women of childbearing potential (e.g. age \< 60y, no history of surgical sterilization or hysterectomy): use of contraception and a negative pregnancy test
You may not qualify if:
- Suspected clinical instability or unpredictability of the clinical course during the study period
- Contraindication to the cardiac MRI examination (e.g. inability to hold breath; severe claustrophobia, metallic devices such as pace makers)
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactoid reaction to any allergen including drugs and contrast agents according to the investigator's assessment / judgment
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value \<30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 derived from a serum / blood creatinine result within 2 weeks prior to gadobutrol injection. Any participant on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis is excluded from enrollment.
- Acute renal insufficiency
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
- Irregular heart rhythm
- Condition that precludes the safe administration of pharmacological stressor according to the respective approved label such as sinus node disease, 2nd or 3rd degree atrioventricular block, obstructive lung disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bayerlead
Study Sites (23)
Unknown Facility
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Unknown Facility
Marseille, 13385, France
Unknown Facility
Saint-Etienne, 42055, France
Unknown Facility
Bad Krozingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79189, Germany
Unknown Facility
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70376, Germany
Unknown Facility
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076, Germany
Unknown Facility
Darmstadt, Hesse, 64287, Germany
Unknown Facility
Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37075, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53115, Germany
Unknown Facility
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122, Germany
Unknown Facility
Leipzig, Saxony, 04289, Germany
Unknown Facility
Berlin, 10709, Germany
Unknown Facility
Berlin, 12203, Germany
Unknown Facility
Berlin, 13125, Germany
Unknown Facility
Auckland, New Zealand
Unknown Facility
Incheon, 21565, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seoul, 05030, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seoul, 05505, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Yangsan, 50612, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Lugano, Canton Ticino, 6900, Switzerland
Unknown Facility
Leicester, LE3 9QP, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Liverpool, L14 3PE, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- Bayer
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bayer Study Director
Bayer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2013
First Posted
July 1, 2013
Study Start
July 19, 2013
Primary Completion
April 10, 2015
Study Completion
August 31, 2017
Last Updated
May 16, 2018
Results First Posted
May 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04