NCT01890421

Brief Summary

Participants being evaluated for suspected or known Coronary artery Disease (CAD) based on signs and/or symptoms, will be invited to participate in the study. The duration for a participant in the study may range from 2 days to 4-6 weeks. One to four visits to the study doctor will be required. This study will investigate the diagnostic results of gadobutrol-enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) images regarding the detection (sensitivity) and exclusion (specificity) of coronary artery disease utilizing a uniform image acquisition software. The CMR images will be tested either against the results from routine clinical Coronary Angiography (CA) or those from Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA), which is used as the standard of reference. The CA/CTA may have been performed up to 4 weeks prior to enrollment or be scheduled up to 4/6 weeks after the study. CMRI and CA/CTA images will be collected for an independent image review (blinded read).

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
426

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Typical duration for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease

Geographic Reach
7 countries

23 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 27, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 1, 2013

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 19, 2013

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 10, 2015

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2017

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 16, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

May 16, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

June 27, 2013

Results QC Date

March 6, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 17, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI (Based on RPS) - Primary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score (RPS), 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative).

    0 to 30/40 minute (min) post-injection

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI (Based on RPS) - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score (RPS), 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=70% for secondary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative). This additional secondary analysis of sensitivity was prospective analysis.

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI (Based on RPS) - Primary Analysis of Specificity Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score (RPS), 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Specificity= true negative/ (true negative + false positive).

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI (Based on RPS) - Additional Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score (RPS), 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=70% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Specificity= true negative/ (true negative + false positive). This additional secondary analysis of specificity was prospective analysis.

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Primary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI versus the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images (based on regional perfusion/regional wall motion score of the 6 myocardial regions) was calculated by blinded readers' assessment. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative).

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI versus the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images (based on regional perfusion/regional wall motion score of the 6 myocardial regions) was calculated by blinded readers' assessment. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=70% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative). This additional secondary analysis of sensitivity was prospective analysis.

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Investigator's Assessment

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on Investigator's Assessment

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on Investigator's Assessment

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on Investigator's Assessment

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on Investigator's Assessment

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg body weight

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received gadobutrol at the total approved standard dose of 0.1 millimole per kilogram body weight (mmol/kg BW) in 2 separate bolus injections: 0.05 mmol/kg BW at peak pharmacologic stress and 0.05 mmol/kg BW at rest via a power injector.

Drug: Gadobutrol (Gadovist, Gadavist, BAY86-4875)

Interventions

Participants received gadobutrol at the total approved standard dose of 0.1 millimole per kilogram body weight (mmol/kg BW) in 2 separate bolus injections: 0.05 mmol/kg BW at peak pharmacologic stress and 0.05 mmol/kg BW at rest via a power injector.

Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg body weight

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female participants aged ≥18 years
  • Participants with suspected or known CAD based on signs and/or (typical or atypical) chest pain who have routine CA without intervention or CTA within 4 weeks around gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI
  • Willingness to undergo stress/rest CMRI and to follow directions and complete all study procedures
  • Women of childbearing potential (e.g. age \< 60y, no history of surgical sterilization or hysterectomy): use of contraception and a negative pregnancy test

You may not qualify if:

  • Suspected clinical instability or unpredictability of the clinical course during the study period
  • Contraindication to the cardiac MRI examination (e.g. inability to hold breath; severe claustrophobia, metallic devices such as pace makers)
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactoid reaction to any allergen including drugs and contrast agents according to the investigator's assessment / judgment
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value \<30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 derived from a serum / blood creatinine result within 2 weeks prior to gadobutrol injection. Any participant on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis is excluded from enrollment.
  • Acute renal insufficiency
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
  • Irregular heart rhythm
  • Condition that precludes the safe administration of pharmacological stressor according to the respective approved label such as sinus node disease, 2nd or 3rd degree atrioventricular block, obstructive lung disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (23)

Unknown Facility

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Marseille, 13385, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint-Etienne, 42055, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Bad Krozingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79189, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70376, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Darmstadt, Hesse, 64287, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37075, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53115, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Leipzig, Saxony, 04289, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Berlin, 10709, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Berlin, 12203, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Berlin, 13125, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Auckland, New Zealand

Location

Unknown Facility

Incheon, 21565, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Seoul, 05030, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Seoul, 05505, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Yangsan, 50612, South Korea

Location

Unknown Facility

Lugano, Canton Ticino, 6900, Switzerland

Location

Unknown Facility

Leicester, LE3 9QP, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Liverpool, L14 3PE, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

London, SW3 6NP, United Kingdom

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Interventions

gadobutrol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Therapeutic Area Head
Organization
Bayer

Study Officials

  • Bayer Study Director

    Bayer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2013

First Posted

July 1, 2013

Study Start

July 19, 2013

Primary Completion

April 10, 2015

Study Completion

August 31, 2017

Last Updated

May 16, 2018

Results First Posted

May 16, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Locations