Regadenoson and Adenosine
Comparison of Regadenoson (Rapiscan) and Central Intravenous Adenosine for Measurement of Fractional Flow Reserve
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to test the accuracy of Regadenoson to induce maximal and steady state hyperemia as compared to central venous infusion of adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve. (adenosine is considered to be the gold standard)and to investigate the time intervals of maximum hyperemia induced by centrally and peripherally administered Regadenoson.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease
Started Jan 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedNovember 13, 2013
November 1, 2013
9 months
December 18, 2012
November 11, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the accuracy of Regadenoson to induce maximal and steady state hyperemia
To test the accuracy of Regadenoson to induce maximal and steady state hyperemia as compared to central venous infusion of adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve. (adenosine is considered to be the gold standard).
participants will be followed up during hospital stay, an expected average of 1 day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
time intervals of maximum hyperemia
participants will be followed up during hospital stay, an expected average of 1 day
Study Arms (4)
Regadenoson central - peripheral
ACTIVE COMPARATORFirst bolus regadenoson administered central, second bolus administered peripheral
Regadenoson peripheral - central
ACTIVE COMPARATORFirst bolus regadenoson administered peripheral, second bolus administered central
Regadenoson central - central
ACTIVE COMPARATORFirst bolus regadenoson administered central, second bolus administered central
Regadenoson peripheral - peripheral
ACTIVE COMPARATORFirst bolus regadenoson administered peripheral, second bolus administered peripheral
Interventions
To test the accuracy of Regadenoson to induce maximal and steady state hyperemia as compared to central venous infusion of adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve. (adenosine is considered to be the golden standard).
To test the accuracy of Regadenoson to induce maximal and steady state hyperemia as compared to central venous infusion of adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve. (adenosine is considered to be the golden standard).
To test the accuracy of Regadenoson to induce maximal and steady state hyperemia as compared to central venous infusion of adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve. (adenosine is considered to be the golden standard).
To test the accuracy of Regadenoson to induce maximal and steady state hyperemia as compared to central venous infusion of adenosine for assessing fractional flow reserve. (adenosine is considered to be the golden standard).
Fractional flow reserve is measured by inducing hyperaemia using central adenosine infusion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-80 years
- Scheduled for invasive measurement of FFR for diagnostic and interventional purposes in proximal or mid segments of a coronary artery
You may not qualify if:
- Severe aortic valve stenosis
- History of severe COPD
- Syncope or bradycardia (less than 50 beats/min)
- Known conduction disturbances (2nd-3rd degree heart-block, sick sinus without pacemaker or long QT-syndrome)
- Severe hypotension (RR \<90 mmHg)
- Patients in whom no access to the coronary circulation can be obtained by the femoral artery or in whom femoral access was problematic
- Coronary anatomy not suitable for FFR measurement (extremely tortuous or calcified coronary vessels)
- Previous coronary bypass surgery
- Recent ST elevation myocardial infarction (\<5 days)
- Recent non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (\<5 days) if the peak CK is \>1000 IU
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Pregnancy
- Use of methylxanthines (in the last 12 hours)
- Use of Dipyridamol (in the last 48 hours)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lokien van Nunenlead
Study Sites (1)
Catharina Hospital
Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5623 EJ, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
van Nunen LX, Lenders GD, Schampaert S, van 't Veer M, Wijnbergen I, Brueren GR, Tonino PA, Pijls NH. Single bolus intravenous regadenoson injection versus central venous infusion of adenosine for maximum coronary hyperaemia in fractional flow reserve measurement. EuroIntervention. 2015 Dec;11(8):905-13. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M08_10.
PMID: 25136887DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nico H.J. Pijls, MD, PhD
Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Lokien X van Nunen, MD
Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2012
First Posted
March 13, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 13, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11