Gadobutrol / Gadavist-enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) to Detect Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
GadaCAD 2
Multicenter Open-label Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Gadobutrol-enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMRI) for Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) in Subjects With Known or Suspected CAD by a Blinded Image Analysis
2 other identifiers
interventional
478
4 countries
24
Brief Summary
Subjects being evaluated for suspected or known Coronary artery Disease (CAD) based on signs and/or symptoms, will be invited to participate in the study. The duration for a subject in the study may range from 2 days to 4-6 weeks. One to four visits to the study doctor will be required. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that sensitivity and specificity of gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) exceed pre-specified minimum performance thresholds of 60% and 55%, respectively, and to show superior sensitivity over unenhanced wall motion CMRI at vasodilator rest/stress for the detection of significant CAD. The CMR images acquired with a uniform imaging acquisition software will be evaluated either against the results from routine clinical Coronary Angiography (CA) or Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA), which are the standard of reference. CMRI and CA/CTA images will be collected for an independent image review (blinded read).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease
Started Aug 2013
Typical duration for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease
24 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 26, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 6, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 10, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 16, 2018
CompletedJuly 31, 2019
July 1, 2019
2.9 years
June 27, 2013
March 7, 2018
July 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Primary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Blinded Readers' Assessment
Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score \[RPS: 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region was rated to have a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR, coronary angiography \[CA\] or computed tomography angiography \[CTA, only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative).
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Blinded Readers' Assessment
Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score \[RPS: 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region was rated to have a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as QCA stenosis of \>=70%, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI verified by SoR (CA or CTA \[only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative). This additional secondary analysis of sensitivity was retrospective analysis.
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Absence of Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Primary Analysis of Specificity Based on Blinded Readers' Assessment
Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score \[RPS: 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region was rated to have a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as QCA stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI verified by SoR (CA or CTA \[only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Specificity= true negative/ (true negative + false positive).
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on Blinded Readers' Assessment
Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score \[RPS: 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region was rated to have a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as QCA stenosis of \>=70%, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI verified by SoR (CA or CTA \[only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Specificity= true negative/ (true negative + false positive). This additional secondary analysis of specificity was retrospective analysis.
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Primary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment
Presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI versus the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images (based on regional perfusion/regional wall motion score of the 6 myocardial regions) was calculated by blinded readers' assessment. Significant CAD was defined as QCA stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI or the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images verified by SoR (CA or CTA \[only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative).
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment
Presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI versus the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images (based on regional perfusion/regional wall motion score of the 6 myocardial regions) was calculated by blinded readers' assessment. Significant CAD was defined as QCA stenosis of \>=70%, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI or the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images verified by SoR (CA or CTA \[only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative). This additional secondary analysis of sensitivity was retrospective analysis.
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Secondary Outcomes (21)
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Investigator's Assessment
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Investigator's Assessment
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on Investigator's Assessment
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on Investigator's Assessment
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on the Investigator's Assessment
0 to 30/40 min post-injection
- +16 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg body weight
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received gadobutrol at the total approved standard dose of 0.1 millimole per kilogram body weight (mmol/kg BW) in 2 separate bolus injections: 0.05 mmol/kg BW at peak pharmacologic stress and 0.05 mmol/kg BW at rest via a power injector.
Interventions
Participants received gadobutrol at the total approved standard dose of 0.1 millimole per kilogram body weight (mmol/kg BW) in 2 separate bolus injections: 0.05 mmol/kg BW at peak pharmacologic stress and 0.05 mmol/kg BW at rest via a power injector.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female subjects aged ≥18 years
- Willingness to undergo unenhanced wall motion and gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI at stress/rest and gated single photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT, if GSPECT will be a study procedure)
- Women of childbearing potential (e.g. age \< 60y, no history of surgical sterilization or hysterectomy): use of contraception and a negative pregnancy test
- Subjects who are scheduled for / have undergone routine GSPECT or undergo GSPECT as a study procedure at stress and at rest within ± 4 weeks of gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI
You may not qualify if:
- Suspected clinical instability or unpredictability of the clinical course during the study period
- Contraindication to the cardiac MRI examination (e.g. inability to hold breath; severe claustrophobia, metallic devices such as pace makers)
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactoid reaction to any allergen including drugs and contrast agents according to the investigator's assessment / judgment
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value \<30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 derived from a serum / blood creatinine result within 2 weeks prior to gadobutrol injection. Any subject on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis is excluded from enrollment.
- Acute renal insufficiency
- Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
- Irregular heart rhythm
- Condition that precludes the safe administration of pharmacological stressor according to the respective approved label such as sinus node disease, 2nd or 3rd degree atrioventricular block, obstructive lung disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bayerlead
Study Sites (24)
Unknown Facility
Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, 90048-0750, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, 60611-2908, United States
Unknown Facility
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States
Unknown Facility
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Unknown Facility
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
Unknown Facility
Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia
Unknown Facility
Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia
Unknown Facility
Chermside, 4032, Australia
Unknown Facility
North Adelaide, 5006, Australia
Unknown Facility
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada
Unknown Facility
Singapore, 168752, Singapore
Unknown Facility
Singapore, Singapore
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- Bayer
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bayer Study Director
Bayer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2013
First Posted
July 1, 2013
Study Start
August 26, 2013
Primary Completion
August 6, 2016
Study Completion
November 10, 2016
Last Updated
July 31, 2019
Results First Posted
May 16, 2018
Record last verified: 2019-07