NCT01890434

Brief Summary

Subjects being evaluated for suspected or known Coronary artery Disease (CAD) based on signs and/or symptoms, will be invited to participate in the study. The duration for a subject in the study may range from 2 days to 4-6 weeks. One to four visits to the study doctor will be required. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that sensitivity and specificity of gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) exceed pre-specified minimum performance thresholds of 60% and 55%, respectively, and to show superior sensitivity over unenhanced wall motion CMRI at vasodilator rest/stress for the detection of significant CAD. The CMR images acquired with a uniform imaging acquisition software will be evaluated either against the results from routine clinical Coronary Angiography (CA) or Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA), which are the standard of reference. CMRI and CA/CTA images will be collected for an independent image review (blinded read).

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
478

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2013

Typical duration for phase_3 coronary-artery-disease

Geographic Reach
4 countries

24 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 27, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 1, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 26, 2013

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 6, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 10, 2016

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 16, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

July 31, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

June 27, 2013

Results QC Date

March 7, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 18, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Primary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score \[RPS: 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region was rated to have a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) verified by standard of reference (SoR, coronary angiography \[CA\] or computed tomography angiography \[CTA, only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative).

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score \[RPS: 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region was rated to have a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as QCA stenosis of \>=70%, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI verified by SoR (CA or CTA \[only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative). This additional secondary analysis of sensitivity was retrospective analysis.

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Absence of Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Primary Analysis of Specificity Based on Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score \[RPS: 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region was rated to have a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as QCA stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI verified by SoR (CA or CTA \[only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Specificity= true negative/ (true negative + false positive).

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Blinded readers evaluated 6 myocardial regions based on regional perfusion score \[RPS: 0=normal; 1=abnormal, reversible perfusion defect (stress); 2=abnormal, mixed perfusion defect (reversible and fixed/permanent components); 3=abnormal, fixed/permanent perfusion defect/scar (stress and rest)\]. A myocardial region was rated to have a perfusion defect in case of a RPS of \>=1 and was rated to have normal perfusion in case of a RPS of 0. Significant CAD was defined as QCA stenosis of \>=70%, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI verified by SoR (CA or CTA \[only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Specificity= true negative/ (true negative + false positive). This additional secondary analysis of specificity was retrospective analysis.

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Primary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI versus the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images (based on regional perfusion/regional wall motion score of the 6 myocardial regions) was calculated by blinded readers' assessment. Significant CAD was defined as QCA stenosis of \>=50% for primary analysis, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI or the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images verified by SoR (CA or CTA \[only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative).

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on the Blinded Readers' Assessment

    Presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI versus the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images (based on regional perfusion/regional wall motion score of the 6 myocardial regions) was calculated by blinded readers' assessment. Significant CAD was defined as QCA stenosis of \>=70%, and was determined based on the presence of a myocardial perfusion defect on gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI or the presence of wall motion abnormalities on unenhanced CMRI images verified by SoR (CA or CTA \[only if disease can be unequivocally rejected\]). Sensitivity= true positive/ (true positive + false negative). This additional secondary analysis of sensitivity was retrospective analysis.

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

Secondary Outcomes (21)

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Investigator's Assessment

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Based on Investigator's Assessment

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on Investigator's Assessment

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Absence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Excluding Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI - Additional Secondary Analysis of Specificity Based on Investigator's Assessment

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • Presence of a Myocardial Perfusion Defect Indicating Significant CAD Per Participant on Gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI Versus Unenhanced Wall Motion CMRI Images - Secondary Analysis of Sensitivity Comparison Based on the Investigator's Assessment

    0 to 30/40 min post-injection

  • +16 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg body weight

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received gadobutrol at the total approved standard dose of 0.1 millimole per kilogram body weight (mmol/kg BW) in 2 separate bolus injections: 0.05 mmol/kg BW at peak pharmacologic stress and 0.05 mmol/kg BW at rest via a power injector.

Drug: Gadobutrol (Gadavist, Gadovist, BAY86-4875)

Interventions

Participants received gadobutrol at the total approved standard dose of 0.1 millimole per kilogram body weight (mmol/kg BW) in 2 separate bolus injections: 0.05 mmol/kg BW at peak pharmacologic stress and 0.05 mmol/kg BW at rest via a power injector.

Gadobutrol 0.1 mmol/kg body weight

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female subjects aged ≥18 years
  • Willingness to undergo unenhanced wall motion and gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI at stress/rest and gated single photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT, if GSPECT will be a study procedure)
  • Women of childbearing potential (e.g. age \< 60y, no history of surgical sterilization or hysterectomy): use of contraception and a negative pregnancy test
  • Subjects who are scheduled for / have undergone routine GSPECT or undergo GSPECT as a study procedure at stress and at rest within ± 4 weeks of gadobutrol-enhanced CMRI

You may not qualify if:

  • Suspected clinical instability or unpredictability of the clinical course during the study period
  • Contraindication to the cardiac MRI examination (e.g. inability to hold breath; severe claustrophobia, metallic devices such as pace makers)
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactoid reaction to any allergen including drugs and contrast agents according to the investigator's assessment / judgment
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value \<30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 derived from a serum / blood creatinine result within 2 weeks prior to gadobutrol injection. Any subject on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis is excluded from enrollment.
  • Acute renal insufficiency
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)
  • Irregular heart rhythm
  • Condition that precludes the safe administration of pharmacological stressor according to the respective approved label such as sinus node disease, 2nd or 3rd degree atrioventricular block, obstructive lung disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (24)

Unknown Facility

Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, 90048-0750, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, 60611-2908, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Adelaide, South Australia, 5042, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

Chermside, 4032, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

North Adelaide, 5006, Australia

Location

Unknown Facility

London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Singapore, 168752, Singapore

Location

Unknown Facility

Singapore, Singapore

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Interventions

gadobutrol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Therapeutic Area Head
Organization
Bayer

Study Officials

  • Bayer Study Director

    Bayer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 27, 2013

First Posted

July 1, 2013

Study Start

August 26, 2013

Primary Completion

August 6, 2016

Study Completion

November 10, 2016

Last Updated

July 31, 2019

Results First Posted

May 16, 2018

Record last verified: 2019-07

Locations