Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecological Conditions With or Without Tubectomy
HYSTUB
2 other identifiers
interventional
105
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a tubectomy during hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions does not result into a premature menopause.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedMay 30, 2017
May 1, 2017
1.8 years
July 1, 2014
May 25, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Anti Mullerian Hormone
Difference, if any, in concentration of Anti Mullerian Hormone one day prior to hysterectomy and on average around six months after surgery between the study groups (hysterectomy alone versus hysterectomy and tubectomy).
at baseline and on average six months after the operation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Dysplasia
on average six months after the operation
Study Arms (2)
Hysterectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORstandard hysterectomy
Hysterectomy plus tubectomy
EXPERIMENTALHysterectomy plus tubectomy
Interventions
analysis of the incidence of dysplastic lesions (defined as: nuclear atypia, pilling of epithelial cells, multiple mitosis), if any, in the removed Fallopian tubes by light microscopy (Leica DM4000)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- hysterectomy (abdominally or laparoscopically) for benign indications
- premenopausal
- age \>36 \< 55
You may not qualify if:
- history of cancer
- hereditary cancer in the family
- previous intraluminal tubal occlusion
- previous salpingitis
- failure to perform a tubectomy during hysterectomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuidlead
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuiscollaborator
- Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhovencollaborator
- Radboud University Medical Centercollaborator
- Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuiscollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, 5223 GZ, Netherlands
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5623EJ, Netherlands
Elisabeth ziekenhuis
Tilburg, North Brabant, 5022 GC, Netherlands
TweeStedenziekenhuis
Tilburg, North Brabant, 5042AD, Netherlands
Related Publications (5)
Piek JM, van Diest PJ, Zweemer RP, Kenemans P, Verheijen RH. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2001 Sep 8;358(9284):844. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05992-X. No abstract available.
PMID: 11570411BACKGROUNDKurman RJ, Shih IeM. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Mar;34(3):433-43. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181cf3d79.
PMID: 20154587BACKGROUNDCrum CP. Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal fallopian tube: theories and realities. Mol Oncol. 2009 Apr;3(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
PMID: 19383378BACKGROUNDSezik M, Ozkaya O, Demir F, Sezik HT, Kaya H. Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Dec;33(6):863-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00669.x.
PMID: 18001455BACKGROUNDNarod SA, Sun P, Ghadirian P, Lynch H, Isaacs C, Garber J, Weber B, Karlan B, Fishman D, Rosen B, Tung N, Neuhausen SL. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a case-control study. Lancet. 2001 May 12;357(9267):1467-70. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04642-0.
PMID: 11377596BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jurgen M Piek, MD. PhD.
Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD. PhD.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2014
First Posted
November 3, 2014
Study Start
July 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 30, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05