NCT02281487

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a tubectomy during hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions does not result into a premature menopause.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
105

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2014

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 3, 2014

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 30, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

July 1, 2014

Last Update Submit

May 25, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

tubal carcinomaovarian carcinomatubectomyhysterectomydysplastic changesAnti Mullerian HormoneTubal Intraepithelial CarcinomaSalpingectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Anti Mullerian Hormone

    Difference, if any, in concentration of Anti Mullerian Hormone one day prior to hysterectomy and on average around six months after surgery between the study groups (hysterectomy alone versus hysterectomy and tubectomy).

    at baseline and on average six months after the operation

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Dysplasia

    on average six months after the operation

Study Arms (2)

Hysterectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

standard hysterectomy

Procedure: Hysterectomy

Hysterectomy plus tubectomy

EXPERIMENTAL

Hysterectomy plus tubectomy

Procedure: Hysterectomy plus TubectomyDevice: light microscopy

Interventions

hysterectomy with tubectomy

Hysterectomy plus tubectomy
HysterectomyPROCEDURE

standard hysterectomy

Hysterectomy

analysis of the incidence of dysplastic lesions (defined as: nuclear atypia, pilling of epithelial cells, multiple mitosis), if any, in the removed Fallopian tubes by light microscopy (Leica DM4000)

Hysterectomy plus tubectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age36 Years - 55 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • hysterectomy (abdominally or laparoscopically) for benign indications
  • premenopausal
  • age \>36 \< 55

You may not qualify if:

  • history of cancer
  • hereditary cancer in the family
  • previous intraluminal tubal occlusion
  • previous salpingitis
  • failure to perform a tubectomy during hysterectomy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Radboudumc

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Location

Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis

's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, 5223 GZ, Netherlands

Location

Catharina Ziekenhuis

Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5623EJ, Netherlands

Location

Elisabeth ziekenhuis

Tilburg, North Brabant, 5022 GC, Netherlands

Location

TweeStedenziekenhuis

Tilburg, North Brabant, 5042AD, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Piek JM, van Diest PJ, Zweemer RP, Kenemans P, Verheijen RH. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2001 Sep 8;358(9284):844. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05992-X. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11570411BACKGROUND
  • Kurman RJ, Shih IeM. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Mar;34(3):433-43. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181cf3d79.

    PMID: 20154587BACKGROUND
  • Crum CP. Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal fallopian tube: theories and realities. Mol Oncol. 2009 Apr;3(2):165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.01.004. Epub 2009 Feb 3.

    PMID: 19383378BACKGROUND
  • Sezik M, Ozkaya O, Demir F, Sezik HT, Kaya H. Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Dec;33(6):863-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00669.x.

    PMID: 18001455BACKGROUND
  • Narod SA, Sun P, Ghadirian P, Lynch H, Isaacs C, Garber J, Weber B, Karlan B, Fishman D, Rosen B, Tung N, Neuhausen SL. Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: a case-control study. Lancet. 2001 May 12;357(9267):1467-70. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04642-0.

    PMID: 11377596BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ovarian Neoplasms

Interventions

HysterectomySalpingectomyMicroscopy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Endocrine Gland NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsOvarian DiseasesAdnexal DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsGenital DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesGonadal Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresUrogenital Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Jurgen M Piek, MD. PhD.

    Gynaecologisch Oncologisch Centrum Zuid

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD. PhD.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2014

First Posted

November 3, 2014

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion

April 1, 2016

Study Completion

August 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 30, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Locations