Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
144
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Robotic-assisted surgery is becoming more prominent within the specialty of Gynecologic surgery with little direct evidence that it is if not better than traditional laparoscopic surgery, at least equivalent. We designed a randomized-controlled trial to compare operative times, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, and post-operative complications associated with these two methods of minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 20, 2017
January 1, 2017
5 months
April 16, 2014
January 18, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Operative Time
The primary end point is difference in operative time
Intra operative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Complications
up to 6 weeks following intervention
Study Arms (2)
Robot-assisted
EXPERIMENTALRobot-assisted hysterectomy
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
EXPERIMENTALLaparoscopic Hysterectomy
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergoing Hysterectomy
- Able to consent to the procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Medical conditions not allowing for pneumoperitoneum
- Medical conditions not allowing proper ventilation during anesthesia
- Pelvic organ prolapse amendable to a vaginal approach
- Pregnant women
- Patients undergoing planned combined procedures including bowel resection (other than coincidental appendectomy) or major urologic procedures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Penn State Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States
Related Publications (1)
Deimling TA, Eldridge JL, Riley KA, Kunselman AR, Harkins GJ. Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jan;136(1):64-69. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12001. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
PMID: 28099699DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Fellow Minimally Invasive GYN Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2014
First Posted
April 21, 2014
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share